Vain Words, Vain Babblings, Vain Janglings

@FMF

My contributions about "reality" ~ pertaining to supernatural things ~ are subjective, as are yours.

I know there is a supernatural dimension to life. At least I know I am more on the right track to believe so then not. And that does not mean the supernatural is everywhere all the time.

You assume that what you know is just about what everyone else must know.

You are a committed zealous propagandist with evangelical zeal for agnostic / atheism.

And I hope you live to a ripe old age full of days. I think you should completely exhaust your theories so that you will know that everything has been tried to eradicate God. I want you to feel that you did everything you could to assure yourself of your agnostic / atheism.

@sonship said
I know there is a supernatural dimension to life. At least I know I am more on the right track to believe so then not. And that does not mean the supernatural is everywhere all the time.

Your speculations about supernatural things result in perspectives that are subjective, not objective. Same goes for me.

@sonship said
You assume that what you know is just about what everyone else must know.

No, I don't. Don't be silly.

@sonship said
You are a committed zealous propagandist with evangelical zeal for agnostic / atheism.

I don't think I am. I think you're talking nonsense. I just make contributions, based on my personal beliefs, to the discussion of various topics, on an online message board.

If I ever start initiating threads and then posting large blocks of html coded texts and hefty copy-pastes of doctrine, or texts, or stuff written by other people, and then I post long tracts like these maybe 6 times in a row, 8 times, or 10 times, or I even reach page 2 with all these long texts explicitly related to promoting a particular ideology, while referring to myself as a "teacher", then you can start asking whether I am a "propagandist".

@sonship said
And I hope you live to a ripe old age full of days. I think you should completely exhaust your theories so that you will know that everything has been tried to eradicate God. I want you to feel that you did everything you could to assure yourself of your agnostic / atheism.

I simply lack the beliefs you have, sonship. And that gives rise to questions and observations. Questions and observations are the lifeblood of a debate and discussion forum and its raison d'etre. I don't believe the God figure you worship exists so I can hardly be trying to "eradicate" it. Nor am I trying to "eradicate" anyone's belief in whatever god or gods they wish to worship or whatever dogmas and mythologies they latch onto in their efforts to please those deities.

@FMF

I don't think I am. I think you're talking nonsense. I just make contributions, based on my personal beliefs, to the discussion of various topics, on an online message board.

You're very charge that I write nonsense self contradicts your advertising.

Sure, observations based on your personal beliefs, meant to convey what is objectively true. They make sense. Outside of those beliefs is nonsense.

If I ever start initiating threads and then posting large blocks of html coded texts and hefty copy-pastes of doctrine, or texts, or stuff written by other people, and then I post long tracts like these maybe 6 times in a row, 8 times, or 10 times, or I even reach page 2 with all these long texts explicitly related to promoting a particular ideology, while referring to myself as a "teacher", then you can start asking whether I am a "propagandist".

How about long long sentences elequently mocking and lampooning other posters with a fake modesty that you are not teaching just like any other "teacher" with or without html code.

Face it FMF. People can see you are on a mission to teach what is the truth just as much as anyone else here.

By the way, I didn't say that that in itself was wrong. I just like to call a spade a spade. And I like to show you your "O No not ME!" attitude is a flimsy tissue of false humility.

You do however hide your propaganda behind question marks pretty skillfully.
I take about 100% of your questions to me as assertions in innuendos.

Tell us more about "O no, not me. I'm different."

If I ever start initiating threads and then posting large blocks of html coded texts and hefty copy-pastes of doctrine, or texts, or stuff written by other people, and then I post long tracts like these maybe 6 times in a row, 8 times, or 10 times, or I even reach page 2 with all these long texts explicitly related to promoting a particular ideology, while referring to myself as a "teacher", then you can start asking whether I am a "propagandist".

So you have a different style. Big deal.

I don't "start" now calling you a propagandist. I've known it all along.

@sonship said
You're very charge that I write nonsense self contradicts your advertising.

You are writing loads of nonsense in this exchange we are having. You are trying to project things on to me and you are ignoring the responses.

@sonship said
So you have a different style. Big deal.

I don't "start" now calling you a propagandist. I've known it all along.

The word "propagandist" is rinsed of all usefulness the way you - you of all people! - are using it here in your rather fumbling attempt to deflect criticism.

@sonship said
Face it FMF. People can see you are on a mission to teach what is the truth just as much as anyone else here.

I am a regular poster who shares his perspectives and who asks questions on the topics that are raised, or I sometimes raise themselves.

I am not a self-styled teacher or preacher, I don't post other people's writing, I don't disseminate a doctrine or a dogma, I don't post video clips of people who agree with me, I don't copy paste massive tracts of text from ideological books.

I just share my opinions and ask questions of other about theirs.

@sonship said
By the way, I didn't say that that in itself was wrong. I just like to call a spade a spade.

Is every single poster in this community a "propagandist"?

@sonship said
And I like to show you your "O No not ME!" attitude is a flimsy tissue of false humility.

"False humility"?

@sonship said
You do however hide your propaganda behind question marks pretty skillfully.
I take about 100% of your questions to me as assertions in innuendos.

I disagree. My opinions are not hidden. I think my questions are pretty point-blank and on target and not reliant on innuendo.

@FMF

I disagree. My opinions are not hidden. I think my questions are pretty point-blank and on target and not reliant on innuendo.

Your questions to me are just about always assertions dressed as questions.

Behind such maneuvers is propagandizing for atheism.

You have that right. I just like to call it for what it actually is.
The "I'm above it all" act concerning pushing your beliefs is not genuine.

The position you relish is as the perpetual examiner sitting back questioning others. Behind the style there is a propagandist and zealot for atheism.

@sonship said
Your questions to me are just about always assertions dressed as questions.

Behind such maneuvers is propagandizing for atheism.

It's a rhetorical style, sonship, and not a "manoeuvre", nor is it "propagandizing". It's just me sharing my perspectives on a message board. I am just an ordinary poster who says stuff and asks stuff you don't like or don't agree with.