Originally posted by FMFmy version of God is typical of the type of bilge that you subject the forum to on a daily basis, i did not author the scriptures, i did not define the personality, its not of my own originality is it, therefore your ludicrous portrayals and unsubstantiated assertions are empty and devoid of anything but gaseous air.
Why don't you just answer the question: Does your version of God still endorse slavery?
Originally posted by FMFwhich law has changed, you said it, you are not evading it this time you charlatan, you stated that Gods law has changed, which laws have changed?
Did your version of God still endorse slavery? Yes.
Does your version of God still endorse slavery? No.
Am I right in both cases?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDirecting personal remarks at me does not address the substance of what I have been pointing out and does not answer the question: Does your version of God still endorse slavery?
my version of God is typical of the type of bilge that you subject the forum to on a daily basis, i did not author the scriptures, i did not define the personality, its not of my own originality is it, therefore your ludicrous portrayals and unsubstantiated assertions are empty and devoid of anything but gaseous air.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour version of God used to endorse slavery and now He no longer endorses slavery [unless you're claiming He still does]. Did this change occur without "change" occurring?
I have asked you to provide evidence that Gods law has changed since page one, where has it changed, you said it?
Originally posted by FMFthats because your texts have no substance, they are empty and devoid, again, you have stated that Gods laws have changed, this is the subject under discussion but you have insidiously tried to introduce slavery and the laws which govern it and entirely separate matter, so i will ask you again,
Directing personal remarks at me does not address the substance of what I have been pointing out and does not answer the question: Does your version of God still endorse slavery?
1. which laws ave changed
2, please cite chapter and verse.
Its a very simply and straight forward question, why wont you answer it, you said it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDoes your version of God still endorse slavery? If He does not then there has been a change in the law that His followers must obey.
thats because your texts have no substance, they are empty and devoid, again, you have stated that Gods laws have changed, this is the subject under discussion but you have insidiously tried to introduce slavery and the laws which govern it and entirely separate matter, so i will ask you again,
1. which laws ave changed
2, please cite chapter and verse.
Originally posted by FMFwhich laws have changed them, please cite the chapter and verse.
Does your version of God [b]still endorse slavery? If He does not then there has been a change in the law that His followers must obey.[/b]
we are not talking of slavery we are talking of whether God has changed, this was your critique of Galvestons statement, if you will not answer then you have no right to press others for an answer to their questions, do you. what up have you no evidence, is your assertions simply little more than the usual gnat straining.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSlavery used to be in accordance with the law of your version of God. Slavery is no longer permitted by your version of God, unless you reckon it is. Does your version of God still endorse slavery?
which laws have changed them, please cite the chapter and verse.