25 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeIs there a verse that supports RJHinds' assertion? I've never seen one. If you think there is, why not just point it out?
Why? You are already doing a fine job of torturing us for what seems like an eternity... so just keep on doing what you've been doing.
Originally posted by lemon limeLemon Lime the point in question here is whether or not Christians here think RJHinds was right to tell me, a Christian, that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal burning in hell.
paranoia
What do you have to say on this?
Originally posted by divegeesterYes, why not? Its his perspective. You need not acquiesce to it, but he has the right to say it. Personally i don't believe it, but you seem to be confusing what he said with his right to say it.
Do you believe RJHinds was right to tell me that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal hell?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHim having the "right" to claim it was not the question. You were asked if he was "right" to claim it. Do you think RJHinds' assertion is scriptural?
Yes, why not? Its his perspective. You need not acquiesce to it, but he has the right to say it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think it is you who is confusing two different meanings of the word "right".
Personally i don't believe it, but you seem to be confusing what he said with his right to say it.
divegeester said "Do you believe RJHinds was right to tell me that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal hell?"
He did not say "Do you believe RJHinds has the right to tell me that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal hell?"
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMF"Ron, thanks for your reply. Let's continue our conversation with personal messages and/or email. -Bob" He declined.
Paranoia? Not so. I think it was an ironic reference to Grampy Bobby saying that he and RJHinds should continue their chat about divegeester's 'deserving to go to Hell' in private [on page 14].
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFOk i understand now, its me who is confusing his right to say it rather than whether the content was right (accurate or correct I think would be better). As someone who does not profess belief in Hell as a literal place of torment I cannot say the content is accurate.
Him having the "right" to claim it was not the question. You were asked if he was "right" to claim it. Do you think RJHinds' assertion is scriptural?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe know it's his (RJHinds) perspective robbie, and of course he is quite within his free rights to express it. The question is, is he "right"?
Yes, why not? Its his perspective. You need not acquiesce to it, but he has the right to say it. Personally i don't believe it, but you seem to be confusing what he said with his right to say it.
Are you going to join forces with The likes of Lemon Lime and Grampy Bobby and refuse to comment on the correctness (of such a statement from Hinds?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFyes but he is funny 😀
It's interesting how flustered some of the Christians here become - those who believe in the torturous fires of "Hell" - when they are called on to explain their concept or explain the differences between competing Christian concepts. I know you don't believe in "Hell" in the same way as RJHinds, sonship and Grampy Bobby do. sonship of course is well able and wi ...[text shortened]... trying to land little forum punches rather than talk about the matter in hand. It's fascinating.