25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesteryou say that you would not take life and yet you have defended the making of war. in what sense therefore are we to understand that you will not take life, its not a very difficult question to answer, is it.
Hang on a second. On the previous page you said that I was as likely to commit those lynchings as the actual perpetrators because I was and I quote you: " ignorant, prejudiced and bigoted " What has my view on war go to do with those insults?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you hold him to be more hateful than the lynch mob members?
I am saying that hate is a difficult thing to quantify.
You have retracted the word "equally". I get that. But are you retracting the very suggestion that divegeester has any "hate" that is even remotely comparable to the lynch mob members
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLet's be clear. Are you know claiming that because I am not a "pacifist" in the traditional anti-war meaning of the word, that I am likely to lynch black people? Is that what you are proposing?
you say that you would not take life and yet you have defended the making of war. in what sense therefore are we to understand that you will not take life, its not a very difficult question to answer, is it.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesteryes, you are ignorant of my beliefs yet you attack them, you are prejudiced having being caught posting excepts from articles that you had not read in full and have publicly stated that you will always oppose the organisation of Jehovahs witnesses making you rather appear to be a bigot of some description. these are self evident from your forum posts.
But "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" are easy for you quantify?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat does this have to do with hanging black people from trees?
yes, you are ignorant of my beliefs yet you attack them, you are prejudiced having being caught posting excepts from articles that you had not read in full and have publicly stated that you will always oppose the organisation of Jehovahs witnesses making you rather appear to be a bigot of some description. these are self evident from your forum posts.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterwhy don't you answer the question? you have stated that it forbidden for you to take life and yet you have justified taking life in the form of war. I put it to you on that basis that you could find justification to take life if you really wanted to. That makes you no different from from those Christians who lynched others, does it. But for me that not the case for life really is sacrosanct.
I sense that pants will be down on the internet once again.
🙂
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo let's try to be clear again:
yes, you are ignorant of my beliefs yet you attack them, you are prejudiced having being caught posting excepts from articles that you had not read in full and have publicly stated that you will always oppose the organisation of Jehovahs witnesses making you rather appear to be a bigot of some description. these are self evident from your forum posts.
Because you claim that I don't understand your beliefs, am poor at reading some (spurious) article and stand opposed to your religious cult...that I am equally as "ignorant, prejudiced and bigoted" as the perpetrators of the lynchings and just as likely to commit them?
Is this what you are know claiming?