25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you suggesting that when Joshua's army killed in war that they were just as morally corrupt as the perpetrators of the lynchings?
so you can easily find a moral justification for taking life by violence, thank you, you will now tell us why that makes you different from the Christians who lynched people, they also found a justification for taking life. You don't think war murders people?
Originally posted by divegeesteranswer the question, what makes you any different? soon as you answer that ill talk about Joshua, your deflections not withstanding.
Are you suggesting that when Joshua's army killed in war that they were just as morally corrupt as the perpetrators of the lynchings?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou said life is sacrosanct. What about the lives of your wife and children? You would not kill someone to prevent them from murdering your wife and children, is that right?
So lets get this are you saying that defending ones family is the same as finding justification for lynching someone? if not your question makes no sense, defending ones child with ones body or hands is not the same as finding a justification for lynching, is it, or you will explain why its the same thing.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFhatred is a difficult thing to quantify I am still trying to find a reason which differentiates him from those who engaged in and were spectators at lynchings, so far its proving futile. perhaps you can help him?
And you choose to demonstrate how upset you are with him by claiming that he would have murdered black people?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd you would not have raised a hand in violence to stop anyone from lynching black people back in the day, and you would not have raised a hand in violence to stop the lynch mob from kidnapping black people you'd given sanctuary to in order to go and lynch them, and you wouldn't have got involved in any political efforts to change the circumstances that made the lynchings possible, right?
that is correct.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo let's be clear, you are claiming here that me standing in opposition to your religious (let's avoid the use of the term cult) organisation is worse that RJHinds believing that another Christian DESERVES to be burnt in hell for eternity?
that is correct. No one has displayed as much ignorance, prejudice or bigotry as he has. Not even R J Hinds.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesteron the contrary its not a starwman argument, they found a justification for killing, you can find a justification for killing, there is no difference.
It is you who are trying to create this strawman argument robbie. I'm showing you that it is a strawman.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterno i am claiming that your standing in opposition is based on ignorance and prejudice. How hard can it be?
So let's be clear, you are claiming here that me standing in opposition to your religious (let's avoid the use of the term cult) organisation is worse that RJHinds believing that another Christian DESERVES to be burnt in hell for eternity?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat you are unable to differentiate or discern the difference between myself and the perpetrators of last century lynchings of black people is your problem, either it is true and you really don't see a difference, or be you are simply creating this horrible strawman as a way of throwing an as hominem at me. My view is it is the latter; I think this whole fiasco is a lie and you are just lashing out in spite.
hatred is a difficult thing to quantify I am still trying to find a reason which differentiates him from those who engaged in and were spectators at lynchings, so far its proving futile. perhaps you can help him?