25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesteryou are floundering, tell us why your justification for the use of violence is any different form theirs. Phone a friend?
No not at, I'm deconstructing your ridiculous strawman which is nothing more than you lashing out with an elaborate ad hominem.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeOh no you don't. YOU have been proven to be a liar twice in these forums (general and spirituality) by myself proper knob and others. So cut the bleating and either engage with the topics in hand or leave us to get on with it.
I don't believe not believing in hell is enough to get someone tossed into hell. I do believe anyone teaching others there is no hell gives tacit approval for not obeying God due to a lack of consequences, and can lead to behavior that gets someone tossed into hell. For a Christian to ignore anything Jesus has said because it doesn't suit them is a danger ...[text shortened]... s is your ticket into heaven because it's what God wants you to do, then you are sadly mistaken.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeBut let me make this clear, you telling me what RJ claims to have said carries very little weight with me. Both you and FMF have misrepresented many of my past statements and claimed I've said things I never said. You have both proven to be a couple of lying troublemakers working only to keep your contrived conflicts alive at these threads... if you think this is your ticket into heaven because it's what God wants you to do, then you are sadly mistaken.
Do you think discussions on a message board can have a bearing on a Christian's chances of going to "heaven"?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat violence is you think it is I've done robbie? I am simply not a pacifist and would defend my community and family. You would not and that is your projective, but then you wouldn't give your child a blood transfusion to save its life so it's not surprising.
you are floundering, tell us why your justification for the use of violence is any different form theirs. Phone a friend?
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterYou cannot tell us why your use of violence is in anyway different.
What violence is you think it is I've done robbie? I am simply not a pacifist and would defend my community and family. You would not and that your business, but then you wouldn't give your child a blood transfusion to save its life so it's not surprising.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterno my dear locally challenged fiend, I am saying that ignorance if its wilful, prejudice and bigotry are morally reprehensible. Man how hard can it be?
So let's be clear, this is great stuff...
You are now saying that criticising your religious organisation is immoral?
Originally posted by divegeesterso that is your reason? you are different because you haven't used any violence? and yet we find in you the same moral disposition of finding justification for the use of violence. I would amend your statement to yet, you have not used any violence yet!
I haven't used any violence robbie. The same way you haven't yet allowed your child to die from not permitting a blood transfusion.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think the expression "'they are symptomatic of an underlying moral disposition" is failing you, not me. You are trying to use it to justify the preposterous comparison of criticisms of JW doctrine with lynch mobs murdering black people. On one level, I sense that you are trying to be a funny maverick but I think you are losing sight of how simply daft and appalling this whole convoluted ad hominem is, here and on the thread where you tried it out the first time.
what is it about 'they are symptomatic of an underlying moral disposition', that yet fails you?