Originally posted by divegeesterno i have stated that prejudice and ignorance are symptomatic of a moral disposition, no blue peters badge for you, but you keep trying to put words in my mouth if you like.
you said that criticising your religious organisation stems from degenerate moral disposition. But you cannot say whether it is immoral or not...? 😵
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFI am sorry i fail to see where you manage to differentiate between divegeesters willingness to find a moral justification for violence and those who lynched people. I am just not seeing it.
Well, you disapprove of the lynchings and murders and you also disapprove of criticisms of your religious group, so that is something that is the [b]same about the two things, I suppose.
You ask: "If you can state why they are different then please do so now". OK. Well, one is murdering people and the other is an expression of opinions that you happen to ...[text shortened]... ies, it would still not justify equating my criticism of Tories to lynch mobs murdering people.[/b]
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeYou are a proven liar, it's been discussed to death elsewhere.
Only twice? I would think someone as skilled at misrepresenting statements as you are should have been able to mine more than two examples. You bring this up from time to time but never actually say what it is you claim I was lying about. Why is that?
I remember both of those times, and one of them very clearly... you were attempting to extract some pe ...[text shortened]... f game you play here at these threads, so as far as I'm concerned that's when you were defanged.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou have just sidestepped a long post that was a direct and personal response to a question you asked me.
I am sorry i fail to see where you manage to differentiate between divegeesters willingness to find a moral justification for violence and those who lynched people. I am just not seeing it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe are not talking about "moral justification" no one is claiming moral justification. This is just you surreptitiously moving the goal post away from your car-crash accusation that I am as hate-filled, bigoted, ignorant and prejudiced and the perpetrators of those awful deeds.
I am sorry i fail to see where you manage to differentiate between divegeesters willingness to find a moral justification for violence and those who lynched people. I am just not seeing it.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterSo you don't think there is a moral justification for violence? I thought you did?
We are not talking about "moral justification" no one is claiming moral justification. This is just you surreptitiously moving the goal post away from your car-crash accusation that I am as hate-filled, bigoted, ignorant and prejudiced and the perpetrators of those awful deeds.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWonderful stuff. Here is the man who won't say wether or not he would give his dying child a life saving blood transfusion, who uses the topic of lynchings to throw ad hominem attacks at Christians (particularly me), talking about morals and honesty. What a laugh.
I resent people attempting to put words in my mouth, sorry, you need to be more honest than you are now.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeWhat do you make of robbie's contention that the murders that he described in the OP to the thread on 'Sunday morning lynchings' are "reflective of the teaching one finds in normal Christianity"?
Only twice? I would think someone as skilled at misrepresenting statements as you are should have been able to mine more than two examples. You bring this up from time to time but never actually say what it is you claim I was lying about. Why is that?
I remember both of those times, and one of them very clearly... you were attempting to extract some pe ...[text shortened]... f game you play here at these threads, so as far as I'm concerned that's when you were defanged.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterYour ignorance and prejudice are well documented, Your bigotry as well, Your justification for the use of violence which you seem t be in denial over now. All in all a through mixed up bag of douchery.
Wonderful stuff. Here is the man who won't say wether or not he would give his dying child a life saving blood transfusion, who uses the topic of lynchings to throw ad hominem attacks at Christians (particularly me), talking about morals and honesty. What a laugh.
25 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesteryour ignorance and prejudice and bigotry are one thing, your attempt to reduce your use of violence to the defence of your family is nonsense, you have justified warfare on this very forum. Whether your moral disposition is any different from those people who engaged in and witnessed lynchings I cannot say. I have been trying to ascertain if its any different for pages now with little success.
Robbie are you seriously suggesting that because I would defend my family using violence if nescessary, that I am as hate-filled, bigoted, prejudiced and ignorant as the perpetrators of the lynchings?
Please say yes... 😵