26 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeYou can by all means if you think there is a case to be made. I would characterize myself as a contributor to this forum's many topics who asks point blank and often apparently inconvenient questions which ~ although they might often attract deflections and evasions and the odd ad hominem here and there ~ nevertheless reveal inconsistencies and contradictions in the things that religionists assert to be true for all of us. Such is the nature of debate and discussion.
Did you want to talk about how you and divegeester indulge yourselves in attacking Christians at this forum?
26 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeYes, which page? You said you stopped reading last night "when the attack against robbie began", so you must have stopped reading when you were reading a particular page ~ when you say it "began".
[b]LOL ohhh man, you're killing me... "which page"
Pick a page, any page on any thread where you and dive and robbie are talking to one another.[/b]
Originally posted by FMFI won't be staying up late again tonight. I need a break from this, and it's Suzis' turn to feed the trolls... where is that girl?
In what way do you think robbie is justified in drawing a moral parallel between the things he accuses divegeester of on one hand, and the actions of murderers who lynched people after attending church? I ask this in the context of what has been said during this discussion about Christians being attacked.
If she doesn't show up tonight robbie will have to take her shift. And if robbie doesn't show then this thread could quickly become 2nd page news. The pay sucks, the hours are long, and all we get for our trouble here is more trouble here... why do we do it?
Originally posted by FMFI called Robbie an aggressive religious runt who had slipped to a new low for using the topic of black lynchings as a trolling mechanism against what he sees as "normal Christianity" and as an ad hominem against me. Lemon Lime must be referring to this.
Yes, which page? You said you stopped reading last night "when the attack against robbie began", so you must have stopped reading when you were reading a particular page ~ when you say it "began".
Originally posted by lemon limeRobbie carrobie has repeatedly accused me in this thread and in others, of being equally as hate-filled, bigoted, prejudiced and ignorant as the perpetrators of the black lynchings of 19th and 20th century. His only reasonings for this spiteful outburst was that I am: a "normal christian', I'm not a pacifist and I stand opposed to his religious organisation.
I won't be staying up late again tonight. I need a break from this, and it's Suzis' turn to feed the trolls... where is that girl?
If she doesn't show up tonight robbie will have to take her shift. And if robbie doesn't show then this thread could quickly become 2nd page news. The pay sucks, the hours are long, and all we get for our trouble here is more trouble here... why do we do it?
What do you think of this attack on me?
Originally posted by lemon limeYou don't seem to want to discuss "Why are Christians under attack?" with anyone, and yet you've posted dozens of times on this thread.
I won't be staying up late again tonight. I need a break from this, and it's Suzis' turn to feed the trolls... where is that girl?
If she doesn't show up tonight robbie will have to take her shift. And if robbie doesn't show then this thread could quickly become 2nd page news. The pay sucks, the hours are long, and all we get for our trouble here is more trouble here... why do we do it?
Originally posted by divegeesterUh huh... so you're saying I revived this thread by making zero contribution to it. That's interesting, because you usually make more sense than FMF.
This thread, and the topic (which I note you made zero contribution to) was already "dead". Interestingly it is you who have revived it now. Why would you do that I wonder... π
Wrong again, as per usual... the contribution was in a form you were apparently not able to recognize. I could tell you what that contribution was, but I'm more interested in seeing who can recognize it.
26 Apr 15
Originally posted by lemon limeYou certainly seemed uninterested in contributing much that was on-topic but instead produced a lot of personal remarks that had little or nothing to do with what was being discussed. As it's closely related, what did you think of the Christian-bashing that went on here on Thread 163746?
Wrong again, as per usual... the contribution was in a form you were apparently not able to recognize. I could tell you what that contribution was, but I'm more interested in seeing who can recognize it.
Originally posted by lemon limeIt was a bit peculiar how you bumped this thread back up to the top of the list by posting about how people would often complain that it took too long for you to move in OTB games and other stuff like that.
Uh huh... so you're saying I revived this thread by making zero contribution to it. That's interesting, because you usually make more sense than FMF.
Originally posted by FMFI think Lemon Lime likes to feel involved. Even if he's actually not.
It was a bit peculiar how you bumped this thread back up to the top of the list by posting about how people would often complain that it took too long for you to move in OTB games and other stuff like that.
Originally posted by moonbusDo you mean why are Christian under attack by Islam?................being mindful that Christians are always under attack by atheists.
One frequent and vociferous correspondent to SF has said that she feels she and fellow Christians are often under attack here. I propose a thread to discuss this. In one recent thread, several correspondents considered the activity to be "discussion" and repeatedly emphasized the hypothetical nature of the thesis, whereas several other correspondents conside ...[text shortened]... an issue in general and not to attack any individual (this means you, Suzi), as genuine.
However ...........atheists don't murder and rape and bash and kidnap Christians but Muslims do)...................so I will ask the question again (do you mean attacked by Islam?)
Originally posted by DasaMaybe if you bothered to read the OP you may gain a little insight.
Do you mean why are Christian under attack by Islam?................being mindful that Christians are always under attack by atheists.
However ...........atheists don't murder and rape and bash and kidnap Christians but Muslims do)...................so I will ask the question again (do you mean attacked by Islam?)