Go back
Why did God create man/woman?

Why did God create man/woman?

Spirituality

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

... not "marriage".


There are more things to consider then just one word.

There are more angles to the matter then just one sentence with one word.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
There are more things to consider then just one word.

There are more angles to the matter then just one sentence with one word.
The OP is something to consider. It has 50 words.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
It reminds me of the time sonship got caught bang-to-rights plagiarizing an Italian writer, probably in his haste to land a dramatic blow [he was in high dudgeon and the quote was about hanging out the burning bodies of unbelievers on chains to "glorify" God] - but then, after disappearing in [presumably] embarrassment for a couple of weeks, he came back bristling, doubling down, ...[text shortened]... o when I was caught red-handed reproducing a block of text from a book without crediting the source.
That was another strange debate. Plagiarism is not tolerated.

I think sonship, because of the overkill in volume of the posting of information, loses track of what who said what and inadvertently it appears as plagiarism.

I'm not going to take exception to, nor overly criticize him for it though since this format isn't that formal a setting. After all nobody here is submitting for publication what is written, or are they taking an exam for a course of study at a university here.

But it is annoying when someone can't simply state their ideas or beliefs in as succinct and brief a way as possible, with just a few reference quotes, without dominating time and space.

It's what those who think they know it all do when trying to indoctrinate those they consider subordinate. Like a pontificating blow hard with an authority complex.

Like divegeester for example. Just kidding. I'm waiting for him to show up here today so I can leave. 😂

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20

@secondson said
That was another strange debate. Plagiarism is not tolerated.

I think sonship, because of the overkill in volume of the posting of information, loses track of what who said what and inadvertently it appears as plagiarism.
A tiny, tiny, tiny ~ minuscule ~ number of sonship's post involve plagiarism. It's just interesting to see his reaction when he IS caught.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20

@secondson said
But it is annoying when someone can't simply state their ideas or beliefs in as succinct and brief a way as possible, with just a few reference quotes, without dominating time and space.

It's what those who think they know it all do when trying to indoctrinate those they consider subordinate. Like a pontificating blow hard with an authority complex.
I agree with the first sentence (above) with regard to sonship but I think the two sentences below it are a bit harsh, although I may well have said similar things about him at times in the past.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
06 Jan 20
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Ghost-of-a-Duke

'God's purpose in creating man is not merely to obtain a sinless man, but even more to have a God-man, one who has God's own life and nature.'

(Living Stream Ministry - What is Regeneration? page 8)


Is this an agreeable explanation to you, as to why God created us?


Ghost, why on a thread about the creation of man/woman did you lift up one sentence from the book dedicated to Regeneration?

Was it that you were trying to portray - For example - "This is what the LSM publications say about Why God created man/woman, from a book on What is Regeneration?" ?

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
I agree with the first sentence (above) with regard to sonship but I think the two sentences below it are a bit harsh, although I may well have said similar things about him at times in the past.
My wife just told me I come across too strong. It's true.

It's the way I was raised. I'm more civilized than I used to be though.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
06 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

A tiny, tiny, tiny ~ minuscule ~ number of sonship's post involve plagiarism. It's just interesting to see his reaction when he IS caught.


So "tiny, tiny, tiny ~ minuscule ... " that FMF is excused from finding a clear example. 😉

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
That man created gods (well, the idea of them at least).
Sure, there's plenty of evidence for that.

But that's not evidence that there's not a creator.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
@FMF

A tiny, tiny, tiny ~ minuscule ~ number of sonship's post involve plagiarism. It's just interesting to see his reaction when he IS caught.


So "tiny, tiny, tiny ~ minuscule ... " that FMF is excused from finding a clear example. 😉
The one I cited earlier.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

The one I cited earlier.


Where ?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20

@secondson said
My wife just told me I come across too strong. It's true.

It's the way I was raised. I'm more civilized than I used to be though.
You come across like someone with a huge chip on his shoulder, especially when you try writing word salads ~ about intellect, and mental illness, and people being incapable of rational thought" ~ as if to keep up with people better able to express themselves than you. Your huff and puff persona here is a waste of breath. Your doctrinal duckspeak and recitals aside, you are one of the least "Christian" posters here.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
@FMF

The one I cited earlier.


Where ?
A few posts ago.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
06 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
You come across like someone with a huge chip on his shoulder, especially when you try writing word salads ~ about intellect, and mental illness, and people being incapable of rational thought" ~ as if to keep up with people better able to express themselves than you. Your huff and puff persona here is a waste of breath. Your doctrinal duckspeak and recitals aside, you are one of the least "Christian" posters here.
Coming from you that's just confirmation that what I'm posting here is good enough to be considered spreading the gospel, since those that killed Jesus said the same things about Him.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29599
Clock
07 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke

'God's purpose in creating man is not merely to obtain a sinless man, but even more to have a God-man, one who has God's own life and nature.'

(Living Stream Ministry - What is Regeneration? page 8)


Is this an agreeable explanation to you, as to why God created us?


Ghost, why on a thread about the creation of man/woman did you ...[text shortened]... publications say about Why God created man/woman, from a book on What is Regeneration?"[/i] ?
You don't think a quote that begins, 'God's purpose in creating man..' is relevant in a thread about why God created man/woman?!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.