Go back
Why is it impossible to prove a negative?

Why is it impossible to prove a negative?

Spirituality

black beetle
Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
Clock
23 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
It seems it was my error. I cant actually find a post where you used "religion" without the word "theist". I thought you had.

[b]I claimed that the theists, according to the original definition of the notion "theism" (specifically, as it was introduced and meant by Cudworth, the man who brought up the notion theism), they believe regardless of their re ...[text shortened]... idols have never actually existed - and thus idolatry has also never been practiced.
Edit: "So it is essentially nothing more than a claim by definition. Seems rather odd that you bothered to bring it up in the first place as it was a somewhat meaningless statement."

It is meaningless to you😵

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
23 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Nordic footnote: argument from Norse mythology is vitiated by reliance on Snorri Sturluson, writing literature many generations after Christianisation of Iceland. What did the priests of Odin really teach? Hard to say, they're out of reach.

Footnote to footnote: the Primordial Cow is probably a hangover from days when the Cow was like Hathor, a deity.

I would focus on currently existing beliefs. Closest current system to the Norse I know of is Hinduism. Does it qualify under black beetle's statement?

vistesd

Hmmm . . .

Joined
19 Jan 04
Moves
22131
Clock
23 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by black beetle
I see your point and I understand it in full, but again you attribute a broader definition to the notion "theism". I did not place these systems under the umbrella of theism because I followed strictly Cudworth’s notion (belief to a personal God who is in full active in the creation, governance and ruling of the universe). The Norse and Taoist systems a ...[text shortened]... even as the “supreme being”. Well played my friend, way to go, I thank you for the lesson!
😵
I was learning as I went, too, old friend! I don’t think we resolved the “dilemma of definitions” though.

I’m returning to my retreat now, so be well! Also my friends Bosse and Twhitehead!

vistesd

Hmmm . . .

Joined
19 Jan 04
Moves
22131
Clock
23 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Nordic footnote: argument from Norse mythology is vitiated by reliance on Snorri Sturluson, writing literature many generations after Christianisation of Iceland. What did the priests of Odin really teach? Hard to say, they're out of reach.

Footnote to footnote: the Primordial Cow is probably a hangover from days when the Cow was like Hathor, a dei ...[text shortened]... ent system to the Norse I know of is Hinduism. Does it qualify under black beetle's statement?
I don't know. My ventures in Hinduism have been strictly Advaita Vedanta and its Shaivite cousin Kashmir Shaivism.

Be well.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
23 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by black beetle
It is meaningless to you😵
So it seams.

You make the rather circular statement that all Theists are Theists (by stating the definition of theism - or at least the one you claim is the original definition).
When challenged, you don't simply point out that you are merely following the definition, you instead start giving examples, asking for exceptions etc and even Bose clearly misunderstands your claim and similarly starts asking for examples of exceptions.

Its really not surprising that I misunderstood you and thought you were claiming that all religions were theistic (they are not).

black beetle
Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
So it seams.

You make the rather circular statement that all Theists are Theists (by stating the definition of theism - or at least the one you claim is the original definition).
When challenged, you don't simply point out that you are merely following the definition, you instead start giving examples, asking for exceptions etc and even Bose clearly m ...[text shortened]... isunderstood you and thought you were claiming that all religions were theistic (they are not).
But Bosse and I, we told you many times that we were following the original definition; in fact, Bosse was the first who passed you over here the original definition of the notion "theism".

I will let Bosse de Nage to tell you whether on not he agrees or disagrees, and whether or not he understands or misunderstands my thesis.

Regarding Hinduism and Bosse's question, I say that the four main Hindu schools do accept that "God" (Vishnu/ Brahma/ Shiva/ Shakti) "are the ground/ source of all being"
😵

black beetle
Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vistesd
I don't know. My ventures in Hinduism have been strictly Advaita Vedanta and its Shaivite cousin Kashmir Shaivism.

Be well.
Oh if this All is Dream
then who was the Dreamer?
😵

black beetle
Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vistesd
I was learning as I went, too, old friend! I don’t think we resolved the “dilemma of definitions” though.

I’m returning to my retreat now, so be well! Also my friends Bosse and Twhitehead!
Sure thing;

Be well my friend😵

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103371
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by black beetle
Oh if this All is Dream
then who was the Dreamer?
😵
ALL is dream,including the dreamer

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by karoly aczel
ALL is dream,including the dreamer
So what is a dream?

Is a dream real?

If a dream is not real, and everything is a dream, then everything is not real.

If everything is not real, then everything doesn't exist.

How can that be?


If dreams are real, and this is a dream, then everything is real and not really a dream.

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
24 Apr 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
So what is a dream?
It has been suggested that dreaming is a consequence of the production of NN-DMT in the pineal gland. That would make a dream an illegal drug-trip!

black beetle
Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by karoly aczel
ALL is dream,including the dreamer
Oh your teacher would hit you hard on the head😵

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103371
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
It has been suggested that dreaming is a consequence of the production of NN-DMT in the pineal gland. That would make a dream an illegal drug-trip!
Life is an illegal drug.

From your very first breath of oxygen

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103371
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by black beetle
Oh your teacher would hit you hard on the head😵
Perhaps.
I should be so fortunate

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103371
Clock
24 Apr 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
So what is a dream?

Is a dream real?

If a dream is not real, and everything is a dream, then everything is not real.

If everything is not real, then everything doesn't exist.

How can that be?


If dreams are real, and this is a dream, then everything is real and not really a dream.
I think thats what you call an existansial quandry-chicken/egg syndrome,if you will.

I insist you must start with a premise if you are to make any progress. That premise may well be "All is dream"

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.