12 Dec 12
Originally posted by tomtom232Green Bay had 22 First Downs to Seattle's 14 and outgained the Seahawks 268 to 238 yards. The Pack was also 7-15 on third downs while Seattle was 2 for 11. That's "outplaying" them?
It wasn't holding it was phantom PI calls. You are the smartest idiot I know or else you are purposely misrepresenting my posts.
I don't care what happened because it is a W on the win loss column but for people who think Seattle was "gifted" a win when they outplayed the other team is ridiculous. Take the refs away and the Seahawks still win... plain ...[text shortened]... TD which was almost just as bad a call as the game winning interception that Wilson threw.
I've ridiculed Seattle fans sufficiently for their insufferable whining about losing to a better team in the Super Bowl that I do not feel it necessary to revisit it. Here's something for ya:
:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(
12 Dec 12
Originally posted by no1marauderMost of that was on their "touchdown" drive.
Green Bay had 22 First Downs to Seattle's 14 and outgained the Seahawks 268 to 238 yards. The Pack was also 7-15 on third downs while Seattle was 2 for 11. That's "outplaying" them?
I've ridiculed Seattle fans sufficiently for their insufferable whining about losing to a better team in the Super Bowl that I do not feel it necessary to r ...[text shortened]... '(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(
12 Dec 12
Originally posted by shortcircuitNo, their "touchdown" drive was extended more than once on horrible calls that wouldn't have been made with the regular refs. Meaning they would have barely had 200 yards and less first downs and only 6 points on the scoreboard. One gift for both teams. I'll grant that they still scored fairly if you only count the play they scored on but they shouldn't have gotten into FG range and then the drive was extended again on a BS call once they were in FG range... I would have been ok with them getting a FG since then the hawks still would have had no need to toss a hailmary and still would have won.
No wonder Green Bay lost. They had to run their offense on a 200 yard long field AND
they had the substitute refs working against them!!
Nice try homer!!
13 Dec 12
Originally posted by tomtom232What game were you watching? There was one penalty called on that drive.http://espn.go.com/nfl/playbyplay?gameId=320924026&period=4
No, their "touchdown" drive was extended more than once on horrible calls that wouldn't have been made with the regular refs. Meaning they would have barely had 200 yards and less first downs and only 6 points on the scoreboard. One gift for both teams. I'll grant that they still scored fairly if you only count the play they scored on but they shouldn't ha ...[text shortened]... ce then the hawks still would have had no need to toss a hailmary and still would have won.
17 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by tomtom232No it doesn't. The 49ers can lose this and still win the Division. Neither is out regardless of outcome.
Well the first bet hinges on the outcome of this game so i'd be betting twice on the same thing... But what do you have in mind?
$20 bet to the charity of the winnner's choice.
17 Dec 12
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperYes but if they don't lose this then they have to lose at home to the cards.
No it doesn't. The 49ers can lose this and still win the Division. Neither is out regardless of outcome.
$20 bet to the charity of the winnner's choice.
17 Dec 12
Originally posted by tomtom232Whew! That was close.
Yes but if they don't lose this then they have to lose at home to the cards.
I hope Justin Smith's injury isn't serious. We'll need him against the Seahawks.
Hopefully after d***ishly running the score against two bad teams Pete Carroll won't respect the 49ers D.