15 Aug 07
I dont think they will continue to win it forever, however this year is not going to be the one where they dont win it. The Rams have exactly 1 threat on O, SJ. Dont talk about Bruce and Holt those guys are getting old and outside experience are no better than most receivers in the league. The Rams D I dont think matches up to the Hawks improved D.
If I had ot pick a team to dethrone teh Hawks this year it would be San Fran not the Rams. San Fran is alot younger in alot of the key positions and will be a beast if not this year then next.
15 Aug 07
2 edits
Originally posted by LeaadasI don't know what to think of this crap. It good be a good sign, meaning we have seattle off guard. Then again it is so dumb it just makes me cook.
I dont think they will continue to win it forever, however this year is not going to be the one where they dont win it. The Rams have exactly 1 threat on O, SJ. Dont talk about Bruce and Holt those guys are getting old and outside experience are no better than most receivers in the league. The Rams D I dont think matches up to the Hawks improved D.
If I h ...[text shortened]... ran is alot younger in alot of the key positions and will be a beast if not this year then next.
Bulger is #5 QB in the league, maybe #4. Can't believe you still underrate him. Hasselbeck isnt too good compared to him honestly.
SJ is #2-#4 RB in the league.
Holt. His 8th year. Old? lol, you guys dream that often I bet. Marvin Harrison is older. He'll presume some 1200+ yd season.
Bruce will always be good. He simply loves the game and not all NFL players do. He'll be a good WR.
You forgot Drew Bennett. Offseason pickup. Very tall - perfect endzone monster.
And who's their TE? Hint: a Top 5-7 TE.
So...you still think the Rams offense is mediocre for this year? Probably, but I don't care if you do or not. Birds don't understand these types of things. Also Darvlay believes the Rams have potency in their O. Bet hammsters and even Phlabibit do too. And any other non rams fan would agree.
You can't ignore their O. It's been a top 7 offense for a very long time now and this year will be at its peak.
PS. The Cardinals will be a competitor once Leinart and the O-line flourish.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by hammster21that aboy the packers offense should be good this year with brandon jackson and donald driver and greg jennings and returing robert fergasin and across Brett favre and there defense has some great players also!
Come super bowl time I'm going to dig this thread up and laugh at the naysayers. The packers are going and thats the truth!
#1 Defense- AJ Hawk, Nick Barnett, Al harris, Charles Woodsen, Arron Kampman, I have their defense on my fantasy team, they'll be good.
#2 Experiance- The pack are a young team, they started two rookie O-lineman last year, The ...[text shortened]... know if they will be good, but anything is probly better then their special teams last year.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by hammster21week 3 packers vr chargers
Chargers, pffft. The chargers have been the "sleeper" pick to win the super bowl for the last couple of years. Don't get me wrong, the still have the talent, but every year they just...suck it up.
It would be a fun match up though. Watching L.T. the best running back in the NFL, getting absolutely mauled by the Packers defense.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by Ramnedhasselback is better in my opion u know why that is becasue he use to back up favre 🙂 jk
You must have bird brains 😛 They had no competition. Darvlay's predictions for the West are great. If the Rams do well on defense I assure you they will win the West and go to playoffs. If not, then their offense should spark a fire enough to go around 9-7 or 10-6.
Bulger is better at QB than Hasselbeck. Ask: Darvlay, hammster, even phlabibit. I bet the majority votes Bulger. He has had the better stats as well.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by RamnedI think you are giving Bulger far far too much credit, and I also think you are under rating Hassleback just a bit. You are right about their O being in the top 7, however their D has been their huge issue. Has it improved? Dont care how potent an O is, with a mediocre D you dont go anywhere, hence whats happened to the Rams the last couple of years.
I don't know what to think of this crap. It good be a good sign, meaning we have seattle off guard. Then again it is so dumb it just makes me cook.
Bulger is #5 QB in the league, maybe #4. Can't believe you still underrate him. Hasselbeck isnt too good compared to him honestly.
SJ is #2-#4 RB in the league.
Holt. His 8th year. Old? lol, you guys dream ...[text shortened]... peak.
PS. The Cardinals will be a competitor once Leinart and the O-line flourish.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by LeaadasI've agree with you about their Defense. I said earlier that if it sparks this year (they drafted defense), then they will go to playoffs. They have the pieces. Just need to put them together.
I think you are giving Bulger far far too much credit, and I also think you are under rating Hassleback just a bit. You are right about their O being in the top 7, however their D has been their huge issue. Has it improved? Dont care how potent an O is, with a mediocre D you dont go anywhere, hence whats happened to the Rams the last couple of years.
And I'm not overrating Bulger. Nobody does that. I checked his ranking on fantasy football. It's number 5. At least analysists think he's solid.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by RamnedOh yeah, but if you are basing your opinion on fantasy football that explains some things. Fantasy is all about stats, and not whether or not the team is winning. And just cause they have stats doesnt necessarily translate into a good team/winning team. Another good example is LT. Helluva fantasy player, but up until last year the Chargers werent winning that much.
I've agree with you about their Defense. I said earlier that if it sparks this year (they drafted defense), then they will go to playoffs. They have the pieces. Just need to put them together.
And I'm not overrating Bulger. Nobody does that. I checked his ranking on fantasy football. It's number 5. At least analysists think he's solid.
On the other hand, I am sure not many people would pick Hassleback for their fantasy team. However he leads his team down the field when he has to, and he puts points up that win football games. In 2005 everyone thought our O was all about Alexander(he was a big part, but he wasn't the only amazing player that year) and that was it. What happens in the Redskins playoff game? Alexander leaves early in the game with a concussion, so everyone is expecting us to get stomped by the 'good' Skins D they had that year. Hassleback took the game/team on his shoulders and won the game singlehandedly. Can you say something similar about Bulger?
I am telling you right now, if our O stays healthy this year they are going to be filthy. And if our D is as improved as people are saying nobody in the NFC west will stop us.
15 Aug 07
1 edit
Originally posted by LeaadasEverytime I say something correct, you deflect it with something else.You talk individual players, I talk individual players - and I used fantasy to prove Bulger has played better than Hasselbeck over the years. The Rams are simply the better franchise if you want to talk history, so don't even go there. Then you say fantasy doesn't prove the better team. I wasn't trying to prove the better team, just the better player. (though the Rams will be the better team this year I am sure - 2 vs 1 on that matter so far). On another note, I am not saying the Hasselbeck is incapable. I am just saying that he is not as productive at his position as Bulger and I am right at that.
Oh yeah, but if you are basing your opinion on fantasy football that explains some things. Fantasy is all about stats, and not whether or not the team is winning. And just cause they have stats doesnt necessarily translate into a good team/winning team. Another good example is LT. Helluva fantasy player, but up until last year the Chargers werent winning tha filthy. And if our D is as improved as people are saying nobody in the NFC west will stop us.
No matter how good your D as improved, our offense can stop any Defense. last year, they scored I think 24 on the Bears Def. And now they doubled the offense's potency with a better O line, SJ, and a good TE and endzone receiver. Seattle's defense has never ever slowed the Rams offense and never will. The only Defense that even stopped them last year was Carolina. But every team has its off weeks.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by RamnedAlright, we'll see by the seasons end. October 21, the Hawks and Rams here in Seattle, we will see
Everytime I say something correct, you deflect it with something else.You talk individual players, I talk individual players - and I used fantasy to prove Bulger has played better than Hasselbeck over the years. The Rams are simply the better franchise if you want to talk history, so don't even go there. Then you say fantasy doesn't prove the better team. I w ...[text shortened]... ly Defense that even stopped them last year was Carolina. But every team has its off weeks.
Our D may not have been able to stop the Rams O, ever is a bit harsh as we did win our home game against them in 2005 31 to 16, but you havent beaten us the last 2 years running. Like it or not our D stopped your O well enough for us to win.
And our O scored 24 points on the Bears in the PLAYOFFS and was banged up and not even in sync. We were 10 yards from winning that game 3 different times so you probably dont want to compare the Rams and Seahawks based on that. I mean the Cardinals the biggest joke of the NFC west scored 23 on the Bears D in the regular season and you want to use the fact that the Rams scored 24 on their D to mark your O as something special? Cmon man
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by LeaadasI told you what would happen if you live in the past.
Alright, we'll see by the seasons end. October 21, the Hawks and Rams here in Seattle, we will see
Our D may not have been able to stop the Rams O, ever is a bit harsh as we did win our home game against them in 2005 31 to 16, but you havent beaten us the last 2 years running. Like it or not our D stopped your O well enough for us to win.
Cheers for knocking you out of it with "The Rams have a better franchise history than the Seahawks." That should take care of your living in the past issues, unless you want me to prove it. But I'm confident you know why I'm right.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by RamnedOh I am living in the present. Its you who is living in the past thinking the Rams will ever be as good as when Kurt Warner wasn't a has been and you had Marshall Faulk.
I told you what would happen if you live in the past.
Cheers for knocking you out of it with "The Rams have a better franchise history than the Seahawks." That should take care of your living in the past issues, unless you want me to prove it. But I'm confident you know why I'm right.