02 Dec 06
according to most of the important stats peyton is the best QB out there brady has been clutch in the past but so has manning he just never won the big one.If i had to play the numbers I'd go with the numbers.i also believe that if you put manning on the patriots they would never lose
02 Dec 06
Originally posted by maverick28at the beginning of the season i wouldve asked to have manning on the cowboys, now we dont need him.
according to most of the important stats peyton is the best QB out there brady has been clutch in the past but so has manning he just never won the big one.If i had to play the numbers I'd go with the numbers.i also believe that if you put manning on the patriots they would never lose
03 Dec 06
Originally posted by Ramned"Nope. www.nfl.com/stats - you'll find just how many more balls Brady has thrown."
I never said Bulger threw more balls.
I was showing how few more he's thrown. not a big difference
Those are your exact words; I didn't edit them. By the way, the argument about Holt being double-covered: He's still their leading receiver for the year, and was their leading receiver in 6 of their 11 games. The other times, it was either Bruce or one of your two running backs. You're supposed to be a fan of this team; are you even watching the games this year?
03 Dec 06
Originally posted by Natural ScienceðŸ˜
"Nope. www.nfl.com/stats - you'll find just how many more balls Brady has thrown."
Those are your exact words; I didn't edit them. By the way, the argument about Holt being double-covered: He's still their leading receiver for the year, and was their leading receiver in 6 of their 11 games. The other times, it was either Bruce or one of your tw ...[text shortened]... cks. You're supposed to be a fan of this team; are you even watching the games this year?
How dare you accuse me?? I have watched their games, and their replays, and, in alot of them, Holt is being double covered. Heh, it goes to show how good Torry is, catching, and how good Bulger is when he throws to him when he is db. covered.
ðŸ˜
03 Dec 06
Originally posted by RamnedOh dear, I triggered the mean smiley. 🙂
ðŸ˜
How dare you accuse me?? I have watched their games, and their replays, and, in alot of them, Holt is being double covered. Heh, it goes to show how good Torry is, catching, and how good Bulger is when he throws to him when he is db. covered.
ðŸ˜
I brought Holt and Bruce into the conversation to contrast the receivers Bulger is throwing to, with the receivers Brady is throwing to. You're right, I could have also mentioned tight end Ben Watson. I also could have mentioned that 55-year old guy they've got running around on both offense and defense.
Anyway, point is, if you knew Holt was their leading receiver anyway, why bring up the fact that he's double-covered in the first place? A lot of teams' top receivers get double-covered.
11 Dec 06
Originally posted by Phlabibit-1 points for him, I'm glad he was on my opponents roster this week 😛
This is because one day can prove everything, right?
Pht.
P-
My reasoning on why Brady is not great:
People say Marino can't be considered great because he didn't win the big one, thats crap.
So I say that winning the big one doesn't make you great
11 Dec 06
Originally posted by Phlabibitno, this week, and the last. He through for less than 100 yards this week. Last week, he almost lost to the LIONS. If it weren't for Corey Dillon rushing for 3 TDS...2 weeks struggling straight. More to come.
This is because one day can prove everything, right?
Pht.
P-
LUCK WITH ST. LOUIS TONIGHT. BEAT CHICAGO!