Originally posted by mghrn55loser? read it and weep saggy
Knuckle dragger is a pretty accurate description of Vespin and McTayto.
I give Carrobie a tiny bit more credit.
He's is just an envy-ridden and pathethic loser who breaks out in
hives when he sees someone else doing better than him.
2016 champions - Da Easy Riders
Originally posted by VESPINHey dummy......if I told you that standing in front of an eighteen wheeler traveling directly
You have no proof on collusion. Impossible to prove. You must prove intent.
Please prove and provide proof of intent by all the people you say are involved.
Thanks,
Cage Fighter
at you at 80 mph would kill you if it hit you, would you need proof to believe it was so?
If so....prove it!!
Originally posted by mghrn55Nah.....cage match with you would be fun. There is a ref for you and you can tap out in ten seconds it takes me to reach you. lol
And then there's Thugsuggle McTayto !!
Now we only need Vespin to drop in and the 3 stooges will be complete !!
I guess he has to finish his pillow fight (ahem ... cage matchπ) with his teddy bear first !!
Originally posted by shortcircuitLOL LOL That was by far the dumbest post in the history of any forum. It made no sense at all. But you in front of the truck sounds good.
Hey dummy......if I told you that standing in front of an eighteen wheeler traveling directly
at you at 80 mph would kill you if it hit you, would you need proof to believe it was so?
If so....prove it!!
Again, you cant prove intent. Sorry you lose. π
Originally posted by mghrn55your right. You don't need a truck driver. Unless you love him or something.
Good one. Nothing wrong with a little humor in this forum.
But the point being made here is we don't need evidence of a phone call between
truck driver and pedestrian arranging the collision to prove that it will be fatal.
But you do need to prove intent.
Sorry you lose.
Originally posted by shortcircuitI can grasp you like truckers and you need to prove intent which is impossible.
True, but my example dealt with proving the obvious to someone who can't grasp it.
Therefore Robbie wins.
You lose.
Take care.
And good night.
Robbie has left the building with his trophy.
Originally posted by VESPINYou must be dumber than a bag of rocks if you can't understand the post.
LOL LOL That was by far the dumbest post in the history of any forum. It made no sense at all. But you in front of the truck sounds good.
Again, you cant prove intent. Sorry you lose. π
Everyone else of consequence did.
Originally posted by VESPINWe've left the 2016 clan results with Russ for review.
your right. You don't need a truck driver. Unless you love him or something.
But you do need to prove intent.
Sorry you lose.
And we have moved on to the 2017 season.
What are you hanging on to anyways ?
Constantly trying to convince the forum that Easy Riders,
a clan you don't even belong to, has some merit.
What role did you play in that clan's result last year ??
You are constantly popping a vein over Easy Riders when you aren't even in their clan !!
That's the question. What gives here ?? Hmmm ?? π²
Originally posted by VESPINOkay, there you go lying once again.
I can grasp you like truckers and you need to prove intent which is impossible.
Therefore Robbie wins.
You lose.
Take care.
And good night.
Robbie has left the building with his trophy.
robbie has no trophy, and he has never been in the building.
You really aren't the brightest bulb in the pack, are you??
Originally posted by VESPINAnd I presume you polished the trophy for him before he left ?
I can grasp you like truckers and you need to prove intent which is impossible.
Therefore Robbie wins.
You lose.
Take care.
And good night.
Robbie has left the building with his trophy.
Or have you been polishing something else for Robbie ? π