Go back
2001: A Space Odyssey

2001: A Space Odyssey

Culture

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Man-apes were straving, right? Right.

They were starving because of the draught not bringing forth food and water, right? Right.

How, then, did the hogs get to be so full of fat and muscle?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't understand! But no one understands that movie anyway.

But here is the short, understandable version:

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
Man-apes were straving, right? Right.

They were starving because of the draught not bringing forth food and water, right? Right.

How, then, did the hogs get to be so full of fat and muscle?
The apes were straving? Starving?
That's got nothing to do with the story.

The monkeys evolve (into humans).
The humans evolve and go and find that which created the monkeys in the first place.

a
wimbledon champ

on the green grass

Joined
21 Aug 07
Moves
7512
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Sigh!!
"They were starving because of the draught",must have been really chilly all those millions of years ago,lol.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
The apes were straving? Starving?
That's got nothing to do with the story.

The monkeys evolve (into humans).
The humans evolve and go and find that which created the monkeys in the first place.
It has got everything to do with the story.

Man-Apes, with the beginings of intelligence, were about to die out. Why? Because there was not enough food around. The first scenes emphasise this - little water, very little plant life, dry, hot Sun etc.

All around is food for the man-apes - hogs.

My question is, from where did the hogs get their fat-building, muscle-building food? The hogs were faced with the same drought problem.

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
It has got everything to do with the story.

Man-Apes, with the beginings of intelligence, were about to die out. Why? Because there was not enough food around. The first scenes emphasise this - little water, very little plant life, dry, hot Sun etc.

All around is food for the man-apes - hogs.

My question is, from where did the hogs get their fat-building, muscle-building food? The hogs were faced with the same drought problem.
From the bones they were throwing around! Duh!

Actually, I found this movie incomprehensible as well.

S
Done Asking

Washington, D.C.

Joined
11 Oct 06
Moves
3464
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
It has got everything to do with the story.

Man-Apes, with the beginings of intelligence, were about to die out. Why? Because there was not enough food around. The first scenes emphasise this - little water, very little plant life, dry, hot Sun etc.

All around is food for the man-apes - hogs.

My question is, from where did the hogs get their fat-building, muscle-building food? The hogs were faced with the same drought problem.
they weren't hogs

they were tapirs

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scriabin
they weren't hogs

they were tapirs
I agree. They were tapirs. My question is still valid.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
From the bones they were throwing around! Duh!

Actually, I found this movie incomprehensible as well.
I do not find the film incomprehensible. The message is clear, though scientifiaclly flawed.

My question is simply pragmatic, designed to cause trouble. A bit like FMF.

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
I do not find the film incomprehensible. The message is clear, though scientifiaclly flawed.

My question is simply pragmatic, designed to cause trouble. A bit like FMF.
I loathe pragmatism.

And the message to me seemed to be "don't ever try to watch this ..."

S
The Mullverine

Little Beirut

Joined
13 May 05
Moves
8481
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
I do not find the film incomprehensible. The message is clear, though scientifiaclly flawed.

My question is simply pragmatic, designed to cause trouble. A bit like FMF.
Ok I'll bite. The tapirs could eat the grass and the grains the evolving apes could not and they also fed off the dead of the starving apes. Plot hole filled. You could use some more willing suspension of disbelief or you might find yourself in the annoying circle of nerdom. ( no offence I have been pulled out many times)

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
I loathe pragmatism.

And the message to me seemed to be "don't ever try to watch this ..."
Watch it again, with the message clear.

Man-apes were about to die out. Aliens found that disturbing. Aliens helped Man-apes. Sent computer (the monolith) to teach man-apes how to survive. Man-apes survived by the sword.

Aliens realised that man-apes would need further help. Aliens planted 'trap' to alert aliens when man-apes needed further re-direction.

Trap activated. Aliens, perspicasiously, arranged for human's next 'education'.

Star-child, Bowman, destroyed 'star-wars' weapons. Star-child marked beginning of next phase of human (intelligent) evolution.

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
Watch it again, with the message clear.

Man-apes were about to die out. Aliens found that disturbing. Aliens helped Man-apes. Sent computer (the monolith) to teach man-apes how to survive. Man-apes survived by the sword.

Aliens realised that man-apes would need further help. Aliens planted 'trap' to alert aliens when man-apes needed further re-direction. ...[text shortened]... ars' weapons. Star-child marked beginning of next phase of human (intelligent) evolution.
But human evolution no longer exists. Natural selection in the human population is basically not allowed.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by StTito
Ok I'll bite. The tapirs could eat the grass and the grains the evolving apes could not and they also fed off the dead of the starving apes. Plot hole filled. You could use some more willing suspension of disbelief or you might find yourself in the annoying circle of nerdom. ( no offence I have been pulled out many times)
Agreed. The Tapirs had a better, more efficient, biochemistry making use of nearly all of the energy of the sparse vegitation / other energy soucres.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
11 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
But human evolution no longer exists. Natural selection in the human population is basically not allowed.
Yes it is!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.