13 Jul 09
Originally posted by PalynkaWell, I would agree that labels such as "alternative", "indie" or "experimental" are meaningless. But a label such as "rock" genuinely tells you something about the song structure. From a musical history point of view, I don't see how you could do without such labels. It's like saying impressionism is not a style of painting.
In generally, labels are for pansies who seek validation by exclusion. Like those who write "What JAZZ are you listening to?" or "What ROCK are you listening to?", the capital letters a product of their insecurity.
OT: Jesu.
13 Jul 09
Originally posted by PalynkaWe like to talk about music and hopefully finf new discoveries. I read all of the music threads. Hell, I listen to a lot of country as well.
In generally, labels are for pansies who seek validation by exclusion. Like those who write "What JAZZ are you listening to?" or "What ROCK are you listening to?", the capital letters a product of their insecurity.
So with jazz, blues, punk, riock, country, and gospal, where am I insecure.
I guess I don't get your point.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121323
18 Jul 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI saw the Eagles at Twickenham a couple of years ago and was a bit dissapointed tbh. The set was ok and they were tight, but all the well known numbers were played before the light went down and the second evening set was lacking atmosphere.
they played Hamden park Glasgow last week, i never went, but they rocked the whole city apparently. My friend also went to see the Eagles on the fourth of July, they said it was almost a religious experience, totally awesome! i myself have only been to one seated concert, that being B.B. King, i prefer to stand up, pogo and try to catch the beer th ...[text shortened]... e! best gigs ive been to, Johnny Rotten and Public image limited, and Deborah Harry and Blondie
U2 at Cardiff in August - should be good.
PS: That's not "beer" raining down on you my friend so I'd keep my tongue in if I were you!😵
