15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraPlausible deniability as a political tool has been used as long as politics has been around.
Yeah, it's "only speculation" that the entire GOP leadership "jokes" about Trump being compromised, while Trump has done everything he could since the Russian attacks to help the Russian military get away with their attack on the U.S.
It is intended to keep the person at the top clear of the issue.
Unfortunately, the Donald with his personality disorder, just can't seem to stay clear of the issue.
That is what is keeping the "witch hunt" alive.
When is his next "campaign rally" ? 😀😀
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderThere you go again...where is the proof?
Or maybe they could have ordered an investigation to amass evidence against those foreign operatives and any Americans who colluded with them in order to file criminal charges.
Wait a minute ....................................................................... they did that and right wingers have been screeching ever since.
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaThe 'next to go' piece was not about Rump firing him, it is about a real effort starting up to IMPEACH Rosenstein, a totally different bit. There in fact is a bill starting up to do just that, doomed to fail from day one because the Rebubs need a 2/3 majority to bring it off and that ain't gonna happen EVER. THAT was what 'next to go' was all about.
I forget who, but someone at the Journalist just penned an article talking about how this is a large failure for the probe as it has established no connection of Trump and no evidence of collusion.
It makes the whole affair look really wasted.
Moreover, the question of whether or not he is the "next to go" simply is one of whether or not the Pres. ...[text shortened]... .
As there is an internal war happening among the GOP, that is not surprising or interesting.
At this point in time Trump has lost the bid to fire anyone, if he does, he will be hanging his sorry ass to dry on a stump.
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThe entire GOP leadership? You know that is not true.
Yeah, it's "only speculation" that the entire GOP leadership "jokes" about Trump being compromised, while Trump has done everything he could since the Russian attacks to help the Russian military get away with their attack on the U.S.
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderElection meddling is her job? Is that why she was fired? You are being ridiculous.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz was chairperson of the Democratic National Committee. "Election meddling" is her job, not a felony like it is for Russian intelligence agents.
I really didn't need Russia to tell me Wasserman Schultz favored Clinton over Sanders; anybody who paid the slightest attention to Democratic party politics knew that.
Russia was in ...[text shortened]... American People non-biased information. Anyone who believes to the contrary is beyond gullible.
Originally posted by @metal-brainShe was fired shortly before the Democratic Convention as a means of placating the Bernie wing of the party and solidifying their acceptance of Hillary as the candidate. Bernie and others had complained about her favoritism towards Clinton long before then, but there were embarrassing revelations in the Russian hacked e-mails.
Election meddling is her job? Is that why she was fired? You are being ridiculous.
BTW, hacking people's e-mails is a crime, a Democratic politician supporting Candidate A rather than Candidate B is not.
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainYou got me - perhaps not the entire GOP leadership, but only a few minor figures who are barely GOP members like the House Speaker and House Majority Leader.
The entire GOP leadership? You know that is not true.
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThat an investigation was started regarding Russian meddling in the election? You need further "proof" of that?
There you go again...where is the proof?
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderElection meddling is not her job. That is ridiculous.
She was fired shortly before the Democratic Convention as a means of placating the Bernie wing of the party and solidifying their acceptance of Hillary as the candidate. Bernie and others had complained about her favoritism towards Clinton long before then, but there were embarrassing revelations in the Russian hacked e-mails.
BTW, hacking people's e ...[text shortened]... mails is a crime, a Democratic politician supporting Candidate A rather than Candidate B is not.
DWS was a tool of Clinton. After she was resigned it is not surprising she went to work for Clinton's campaign. She was an obedient tool.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/elizabeth-warren-dnc-rigged/index.html
Originally posted by @no1marauderAn illegal investigation was started because of alleged Trump/Russia collusion. Do keep your facts straight, just another weasel attempt.
That an investigation was started regarding Russian meddling in the election? You need further "proof" of that?
Poor poor snitch cant provide proof...LOL
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople"Illegal" in what way, Mr. Coward?
An illegal investigation was started because of alleged Trump/Russia collusion. Do keep your facts straight, just another weasel attempt.
Poor poor snitch cant provide proof...LOL
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainI put election meddling in " " as you seem to be making no distinction between the "meddling" of supporting one candidate over another and the meddling of stealing stuff from a political campaign and then making it public to help a particular candidate win.
Election meddling is not her job. That is ridiculous.
DWS was a tool of Clinton. After she was resigned it is not surprising she went to work for Clinton's campaign. She was an obedient tool.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/elizabeth-warren-dnc-rigged/index.html
15 Jul 18
Here's some more interesting stuff from the indictment:
“On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, received a request for stolen documents from a candidate for U.S. Congress. The Conspirators responded using the Guccifer 2.0 persona and sent the candidate stolen documents related to the candidate's opponent.”
That candidate appears to have been Florida Republican Brian Mast.https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2018/07/13/florida-republicans-play-starring-roles-in-russia-hacking-indictment-510037
So a Republican's campaign was asking for stolen documents to help their campaign. Illegal much?
15 Jul 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderso meuller is colluding with gucifer 2.0?
Here's some more interesting stuff from the indictment:
“On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, received a request for stolen documents from a candidate for U.S. Congress. The Conspirators responded using the Guccifer 2.0 persona and sent the candidate stolen documents related to the candidate's opponent.”
That cand ...[text shortened]... So a Republican's campaign was asking for stolen documents to help their campaign. Illegal much?