@Suzianne
I'll see if I can find it.
In the thread 'who will run our security....,
"You silly goose. Trump also said he was in love with Kim.
Well that is two reasons I will NOT vote for Trump. Three reasons if we throw in his orange skin." unquote.
Hey, I believe him, don't you🙂
@sonhouse saidWow.
@Suzianne
I'll see if I can find it.
In the thread 'who will run our security....,
"You silly goose. Trump also said he was in love with Kim.
Well that is two reasons I will NOT vote for Trump. Three reasons if we throw in his orange skin." unquote.
Hey, I believe him, don't you🙂
No, I don't.
@AverageJoe1 saidDon't you get it? Kamala wasn't repeatedly called out for lying in real time or fact-checked in real time because it wasn't necessary. Trump's a pathological liar, Kamala isn't.
Who is going to look all that up. You may be right.
But all of you are really bad in ferreting out issues in these complicated posts.
You see, my point is not about Trump's lies.
The moderators were very biased , in that they fact-checked Trump but did not ONE fact check of Calamael. That is the point. Gloss over it, and bless the debate by ABC. See how ...[text shortened]... I say no, you say yes. One of us is quite logical.
Pitiful. Tell us that you are not a dependent.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe election was not decided by the debate. The Electoral College handed the Oval Office to the loser.
the lib media was proclaiming killary won the debates in 2016 too...how did that work out for you? LOL
@AverageJoe1 saidWho?
Who is going to look all that up. You may be right.
But all of you are really bad in ferreting out issues in these complicated posts.
You see, my point is not about Trump's lies.
The moderators were very biased , in that they fact-checked Trump but did not ONE fact check of Calamael. That is the point. Gloss over it, and bless the debate by ABC. See how ...[text shortened]... I say no, you say yes. One of us is quite logical.
Pitiful. Tell us that you are not a dependent.
@AverageJoe1 saidWho?
No,I mean that these prepared questions made mo provision to ask follow-ups on Kamalar. YOu gonna let me win another post by changiing the subject? Even KMarauder tried to do it. Change the issue. Geez. Let me see if there is another.
@moonbus saidShe needs more of this, maybe people will begin to see that the emperor has no clothes.
Trump showed his true colors: petty, vindictive, flustered when not in control of the narrative, and childish.
The take away moment for me was when he claimed that crime rates are rising (implying it's Biden's fault--but what has that to do with Harris??); he gets called out for it by the moderator, citing FBI statistics that violent crime rates have been falling; Trump do ...[text shortened]... g 'alternative facts' to trigger his voter base's darkest fears; this is just plain schoolboy dopey.
@AverageJoe1 saidI did not say she never ever lied in her entire life. I said she is not a pathological liar. The Donald is, and that is why it is high time journalists call him out for it, every time he opens his mouth.
moonbussaysKhasnotlied
@AverageJoe1 saidSure. When a company goes belly up, the courts step in and disburse the remaining assets to the creditors. The U.S. tax payer, which is you Joe, picks up the rest of the bill.
You are on it! Could you explain the concept and effects of bankruptcy to these little fellers?
@moonbus saidMoonbus is wrong again, you need to all settle down. Worst thing that happens to 'other people' is that the person who 'took a risk' by giving credit to the bankrupt.......well, he took a risk. He loses it all.
Sure. When a company goes belly up, the courts step in and disburse the remaining assets to the creditors. The U.S. tax payer, which is you Joe, picks up the rest of the bill.
You libs just cannot fathom this concept, because you think the government should coddle and proottteeeeeeeeeccct the citizens. They should not. It is not in the constitution.
Here is the skinny:
That means that the one paying for those bankruptcy discharges is the companies and creditors who debtors owed in the first place. So, do taxpayers pay for people's bankruptcies? The answer is no – and anyone who tells you otherwise is probably just misinformed.
@AverageJoe1
So tell us AGAIN why you are NOT voting for Trump.
And tell us again why a 20% tariff will hurt foreign companies.
Tell us again exactly who will be paying that 'tariff'.
Tell us again why Trump's 'tariff' is not an up front sales tax and why American companies like Grainger would not just pass that 20% increase to their customers
or do you think Grainger and all the other companies buying foreign goods would also NOT pass on that 20% price increase to THEIR customers?
Surely they can live with a 20% decrease in their profit margin, stands to reason they would just accept it as the price for doing business, right?
That aluminum bar that they bought from Sony that Sony charged 10 bucks for now costs Grainger TWELVE dollars, but OF COURSE they would NEVER push that onto the customers where they expect say a 30% profit and now it would be a 10% profit, they would go, OK for the good of the country, we will still only charge 13 bucks for that Aluminum bar, right?
@sonhouse saidWhatever little feller.
@AverageJoe1
So tell us AGAIN why you are NOT voting for Trump.
And tell us again why a 20% tariff will hurt foreign companies.
Tell us again exactly who will be paying that 'tariff'.
Tell us again why Trump's 'tariff' is not an up front sales tax and why American companies like Grainger would not just pass that 20% increase to their customers
or do you think Grainger ...[text shortened]... go, OK for the good of the country, we will still only charge 13 bucks for that Aluminum bar, right?
Question for Sonhouse, which you will not answer.
If Tariffs are a bad thing, why did Biden not get rid of the Trump tariffs on "Day ONE!!! (Biden loves to say Day One!, makes him feel big.)
Why did Biden not get rid of the Trump Tariffs on day one!?
Why did Biden not get rid of the Trump Tariffs on day one?
@AverageJoe1
Do you even know WHO pays for tariffs? Do you seriously think foreign companies pay that tax?
Here is a bit on why Biden kept the tariffs but of course you won't believe it if you even deign to actually read it. It IS more than three lines so it might be beyond your eye glazing spec.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/26/politics/china-tariffs-biden-policy/index.html
Wow, it took me about 30 seconds to find out what you could have had you actually thought to do it yourself.
But of course the only reason you asked the question in the first place was to weaponize the subject since you think a stupid attack like this will win you brownie points if Trump wins.