Debates
09 Nov 05
12 Nov 05
After reading the catfood guy's psychoanalysis of the mechanic guy's shower fantasy, I find myself (just myself, nobody else, and especially no stinking atheist) juxtaposed: I am slightly stirred within, having been privvy to an intimate exchange between two consenting adults; yet also feeling somewhat guilty, in that, surely, I should be paying for these types of services.
As I am not a subscriber, is there a separate charge for these activities? Where does one send one's payment?
If required, can I view more of these exchanges?
13 Nov 05
2 edits
Therein lies the rub: this is all so new and exciting, I wasn't even sure what it all meant.
The rapport, the commraderie, the utter banality of it all. Quite adjective-inspiring, really.
As what would one classify this banter? Suspense? Thrills? Typological karaoke?
What title would accurately describe the effete nature of the subject matter?
Hmmm....
P.S. What is a "rec?"
13 Nov 05
Originally posted by WhatzaJVGI can only suggest you stretch your neck and blow yourself....it will cost you nothing, except maybe a trip to the Chiropractor....
After reading the catfood guy's psychoanalysis of the mechanic guy's shower fantasy, I find myself (just myself, nobody else, and especially no stinking atheist) juxtaposed: I am slightly stirred within, having been privvy to an intimate exchange between two consenting adults; yet also feeling somewhat guilty, in that, surely, I should be paying for thes ...[text shortened]... tivities? Where does one send one's payment?
If required, can I view more of these exchanges?
13 Nov 05
Originally posted by Bosse de NageThose God fearing suicide bombers in Iraq and Israel sure make good American patriots!
...as GB Jr might say if he attempted to quote his illustrious father's words: George Bush Snr: "no, I Don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens,
Nor should they be considered patriots. this is one nation under god."
Do atheists make poor patriots?
13 Nov 05
Originally posted by catfoodtimThere's a difference between disliking (or even in some cases, hating) homosexuals and being afraid of the very idea of being a homosexual. Though it is definately possible for someone to be guilty of both, it is not always the case. It is amazing that some people have a pure hate for something they don't themselves take part in or understand (in this case, homosexuality). It is also amazing how many other people believe that those same type of hateful people MUST be gay themselves, simply on the basis that they do not approve of the lifestyle.
[b]No, just as homos can make good soldiers/sailors....I'd rather know that an atheist is in the next shower stall, though
naturally an atheist couldn't be gay as well. and it's great to see in your scheme of things that those who don't believe in god are preferable to those that are gay.
instead of a "meat gazer"....no I'm not homoph ...[text shortened]... don't tell.....and better yet....dont gaze!!!!
is this advice to gay men or to yourself?[/b]
14 Nov 05
Originally posted by chancremechanicFor clarification purposes, which part of said activity would be considered homothexual: the blowing part, or the being blown part?
I can only suggest you stretch your neck and blow yourself....it will cost you nothing, except maybe a trip to the Chiropractor....
14 Nov 05
1 edit
Originally posted by lioyankEven more amazing is how some swallow hook, line and sinker the ideology that disapproval (ardent or otherwise) is akin to hatred. Friends with more homosexuals than you can shake your stick at, I can nonetheless abhor their behaviour without ever coming (don't get excited, mechanic guy) close to hating any of them.
There's a difference between disliking (or even in some cases, hating) homosexuals and being afraid of the very idea of being a homosexual. Though it is definately possible for someone to be guilty of both, it is not always the case. It is amazing that some people have a pure hate for something they don't themselves take part in or understand (in this case ...[text shortened]... ul people MUST be gay themselves, simply on the basis that they do not approve of the lifestyle.
Does society condone child molestation or sexual relations with livestock? Not currently, but the hue and cry against the "haters" is somehow non-existent. Why? Because it isn't close enough to mainstream to allow those for it an opportunity to categorize those against it as -gasp!- discriminators, aka, haters.
God forbid we should actually have lines of demarcation between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour! Very slick move, actually, to criminalize those against fill-in-the-blank behaviour. The activity really doesn't matter, nor should it be questioned. What should be questioned are the haters... THEY are the problem! Somewhat like the wizard forswearing Dorothy and company from looking behind the curtain.
14 Nov 05
Originally posted by Bosse de NageEgads, man! You've caught me redhotpawn-handed! At last my duplicity can come to an end! Oh, the humanity! By day, a mild- mannered division auditor for the IRS (with all these rules against personal sign-ons, for some reason), by night, fighter of obtusity, champion of clarity, pricker of hot air bags such as yourself.
No, I'm not.
Whatsa JVG, JVG7?
It's a dirty, thankless job, but somebuddy's gotzta do it.