@shavixmir saidDon't get out much, do you? Muslim population in Europe has been growing steadily for many years.
There are no moslims taking over Europe.
It’s been a steady 5% of the population since the 1990’s.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/11/29/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/
@shavixmir saidUsing figures to fool yourself only. Others are smarter then that:
There are no moslims taking over Europe.
It’s been a steady 5% of the population since the 1990’s.
The number of Muslims in Europe has grown from 29.6 million in 1990 to 44.1 million in 2010.34 Europe’s Muslim population is projected to exceed 58 million by 2030. Muslims today account for about 6% of Europe’s total population, up from 4.1% in 1990. By 2030, Muslims are expected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2011/01/27/future-of-the-global-muslim-population-regional-europe/#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20Muslims%20in,to%2044.1%20million%20in%202010.&text=Europe's%20Muslim%20population%20is%20projected,up%208%25%20of%20Europe's%20population.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidCorrect. The man is Muslim, pretends to be atheist here.
Don't get out much, do you? Muslim population in Europe has been growing steadily for many years.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/11/29/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/
@Cliff-Mashburn saidIn Scotland too. I read some news reports of Islamic movements going on there. The only people who are going to deny these things are supporters of Islam, and we can tell who these are. You will know them by the nonsense reasoning they promote ... eg " .. which personal problems have you suffered at the hand of moslims?"
Not just London either, lots of other English cities have been taken over.
42d
@KingDavid403 saidGot me. I meant the 'Admiral' part was meaningless. Four stars? It was just to say 'Look at us, we have the first ladyboy admiral.' Just another woke, Didn't Earn It position. Guess I'm a bigot, huh.
The eight branches of the United States military are:
U.S. Army: Responsible for combat missions on land
U.S. Marine Corps: A rapid-reaction force that can fight on land and sea
U.S. Navy: Protects the oceans and is America's forward deployed force
U.S. Air Force: Conducts military operations in the air and provides air and space capability
U.S. Space Force: The ...[text shortened]...
Each branch has its own role, but they all work together to protect the country and its interests.
42d
@Mott-The-Hoople saidSurgeons who have been performing these operations for decades would disagree that they are "morons".
“morons” think you can change you sex
Right wing denial of reality doesn't change it.
@no1marauder saidIts either you are a liar or you really do not know the truth. Im sure it is the former. You just cannot help it. Lying is hard wired into your genetic makeup, much like gender is , and just cannot be changed.
Surgeons who have been performing these operations for decades would disagree that they are "morons".
Right wing denial of reality doesn't change it.
Is a transgender woman still genetically male after surgery?
“Genetically, is a transgender woman still a male regardless if she has had sex reassignment surgery?”
What a thought-provoking question! First, it’s important to understand that biological sex and gender identity are not the same. Biological sex refers to the physical features of a human body (or anatomy).
Gender identity refers to one’s internal sense of being. That may align more toward being a male, female, or anywhere in between. Some people who identify as nonbinary may not have an internal sense of being a male or female at all!
Sex reassignment surgery involves changing a person’s anatomy. Whether a person identifies as a male or female shouldn’t change after surgery. And it doesn’t change their genetics either!
Let’s take a deeper dive. Genetics overall cannot be changed (so far, at least). Each person is born with a set of genetic instructions wound up into packages called chromosomes. The instructions can help determine things like hair color or eye color.
There are also genetic instructions that can lead to sex characteristics. Sex chromosomes, in particular, determine whether someone will have female or male body parts. Whatever set of chromosomes a person has when they are born cannot be changed. This is because chromosomes are in all the cells that make up our bodies.
To change a person’s chromosomes would mean changing trillions of cells! There aren’t any technologies (and probably won’t be in the future) that can change a chromosome in all of a person’s cells.
https://www.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/articles/2020/transgender-genetics/#:~:text=An%20individual%20with%20one%20X,that%20make%20up%20our%20bodies.
@Rajk999 saidSorry, that isn't the scientific consensus.https://cen.acs.org/biological-chemistry/genomics/Scientists-reject-binary-view-human/102/i33
Its either you are a liar or you really do not know the truth. Im sure it is the former. You just cannot help it. Lying is hard wired into your genetic makeup, much like gender is , and just cannot be changed.
[i]Is a transgender woman still genetically male after surgery?
“Genetically, is a transgender woman still a male regardless if she has had sex reassignm ...[text shortened]... 2020/transgender-genetics/#:~:text=An%20individual%20with%20one%20X,that%20make%20up%20our%20bodies.
42d
@Cliff-Mashburn saidhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Europe#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20Muslims%20in,5%25%20of%20the%20total%20population.
Don't get out much, do you? Muslim population in Europe has been growing steadily for many years.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/11/29/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/
The number of Muslims in European countries is estimated at 44 million, or 5% of the total population.
Roughly the same as the 90’s.
And I seriously can’t be arsed looking up the source material for you.
42d
@Rajk999 saidThe whole 2.2% of the Scottish population who are moslim…
In Scotland too. I read some news reports of Islamic movements going on there. The only people who are going to deny these things are supporters of Islam, and we can tell who these are. You will know them by the nonsense reasoning they promote ... eg " .. which personal problems have you suffered at the hand of moslims?"
42d
@DJJ saidGuess I'm a bigot, huh.
Got me. I meant the 'Admiral' part was meaningless. Four stars? It was just to say 'Look at us, we have the first ladyboy admiral.' Just another woke, Didn't Earn It position. Guess I'm a bigot, huh.
Ask yourself and God; not me. The real question here is: why do you give a fk what this person does with their life, in their pursuit of happiness?
Didn't Earn It position.
This statement just shows how stupid you actually are.
. I meant the 'Admiral' part was meaningless. Four stars?
"The United States also has two other uniformed services, which are not part of the Armed Forces: U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps.
The military's mission is to protect the United States and its interests at home and abroad. The branches have different roles, requirements, and functions, but they all work together to defend against threats."
Some educational facts for your little mind.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWhat is it to you if he* has a job or not, as long as he does that job well. 😀
"She" will be out of a job the instant Trump takes his hand off the bible after swearing in.
* I use the pronoun 'he' for anyone with XY chromosomes.
@thedogandthecello saidFirstly like in America, people seeking asylum in Australia have been treated hysterically by right wing media. Rather than look at the conditions for why people would seek asylum the issue became a political football with any party showing a shred of humanity over the issue finding itself basically unelectable.
@kmax87
Doesn't Australia have some of the strictest immigration laws known?
What could you possibly have to offer to countries who are suffering from it?
Secondly it's very hard to come to Australia illegally, just because of its location, being surrounded by water. Most illegal visitors are those who arrive by air and overstay their Visa's and the numbers are low around 0.2 - 0.35%
But the argument which won the day against illegal/asylum seeking boat people was that we (Australians) had to stop the practice because of the danger of death by drowning when people would give everything to shonky operators to get them to the mainland in craft that would get here my sheer miracle and not fall apart. And then the right leaning government put in it's master plan of off shore processing such that anyone coming by sea regardless of their legitimacy (refugee status) were put on Manus island until they could be processed. This has led to mass internment for many years for some.
Australia's policy regarding 'illegal' entry is diabolical, detestable and disgusting. Because of the rules in place if you are a refugee you need official clearance from embassies in your country of origin to meet the requirements of coming to Australia. And the officialdom in the country you are fleeing from might not value you and would want you dead seems to be a moot point.
That Australia can prevent illegal immigration is largely a geographical phenomenon. That it makes it insanely tough to arrive for those who have legitimate reasons to leave their own country, we should always remember the white Australia policy that up until the 70's kept people of color out of the country through beauraratic sneakiness. Look up the dictation test.
Basically you are never going to get my support for your argument based on what my country does. We are an Opec country that has enjoyed a lifestyle that has benefited from Western Imperialism. We can ignore the return wave of peoples who want the advantages of living in the west relative to the living standards of the exploited economies of the country's they are from, but many have an opaque amnesia about doing the right thing and prefer to hide behind the old, 'well I didn't do it, it wasn't me' defense. In my view it's just bad karma to refuse entry for those from countries that we have benefitted from in one way or another.
42d
@Rajk999 saidA steady 5% and you debunk those numbers with a trend from 4% to 6%.
Using figures to fool yourself only. Others are smarter then that:
[i]The number of Muslims in Europe has grown from 29.6 million in 1990 to 44.1 million in 2010.34 Europe’s Muslim population is projected to exceed 58 million by 2030. Muslims today account for about 6% of Europe’s total population, up from 4.1% in 1990. By 2030, Muslims are expected to make up 8% of Europ ...[text shortened]... 202010.&text=Europe's%20Muslim%20population%20is%20projected,up%208%25%20of%20Europe's%20population.
I tell you. When did math stop being compulsory?