Go back
Analysis: 100% of Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots are From Only 5% of the Manufacturer Lots

Analysis: 100% of Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots are From Only 5% of the Manufacturer Lots

Debates

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107133
Clock
04 Nov 21

@eintaluj said
Dr Mike Yeadon – “The findings that 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths have been caused by just 5% of the batches produced are unprecedented”
Tap News, November 03, 2021

https://tapnewswire.com/2021/11/[WORD TOO LONG]/

Dr Mike Yeadon - former Vice-President of Pfizer
You are welcome to your rabbit hole. What you may not be aware of is Michael Yeadon's claims which can be found on Rumble and Bitchute, that the end goal of these Covid Vaccines is a planned depopulation event, a culling of the world's population. Now if you really believe that, what could I possibly say to change your mind??

So enjoy your rabbit hole. But just have a think. If the end goal by the"ELITES" is to radically reduce the world's population, do you really think that "THEY" would bother with all this subterfuge when "THEY" have access to much more direct and insidious poisons and germ warfare, that if unleashed would reach their goal without much bother at all. Or maybe do you think that the real goal is to product test mRNA-tech on a 7 billion guinea pigs to work out the kinks and in the second round give the quality gear to the "ELITES" and then target the proles they don't need anymore with the end of life stuff??!!??

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21

@kmax87 said
So you basically cast shade on Pfizer to help your argument and you wondered aloud without actually accusing them of anything. Right!
"without actually accusing them of anything"
"anything"

It is useless to explain to you logical nuances as at the next step you just repeat your earlier logical mistakes.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107133
Clock
04 Nov 21

@eintaluj said
"without actually accusing them of anything"
"anything"

It is useless to explain to you logical nuances as at the next step you just repeat your earlier logical mistakes.
Nuance! A lovely word. A nuanced response. Even better!!

That's one way to cover all bases without committing yourself and then claim your meaning was misconstrued when someone points out a flaw.

Nuance hey? I'm gonna try me some of that!

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21

@kmax87 said
You are welcome to your rabbit hole. What you may not be aware of is Michael Yeadon's claims which can be found on Rumble and Bitchute, that the end goal of these Covid Vaccines is a planned depopulation event, a culling of the world's population. Now if you really believe that, what could I possibly say to change your mind??

So enjoy your rabbit hole. But just have a think ...[text shortened]... to the "ELITES" and then target the proles they don't need anymore with the end of life stuff??!!??
"that the end goal of these Covid Vaccines is a planned depopulation event, a culling of the world's population. Now if you really believe that, what could I possibly say to change your mind??"

I do NOT believe that the purpose of Covid vaccines is reducing the world's population. Such a hypothesis has a nonzero initial probability nevertheless, but scarcely this hypothesis is proved. You have not commented on Michael Yeadon's claim that the present statistics is unprecedented and cannot be explained in a usual way.

Besides, if the previous vice president of Pfizer is a nut, then what is the impression of Pfizer as a whole?

You need some psychiatric help, that much I can say based on your comments belonging to some alternative universe.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107133
Clock
04 Nov 21

@eintaluj said

You need some psychiatric help, that much I can say based on your comments belonging to some alternative universe.
Charming! And there I was waiting for something nuanced...
I think you need to work on your projection...

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I do not talk with such users like kmax87. In the forum "Debates" they are creating noise, hindering real discussion and debate. In the present case, I shared an article about Pfizer's fresh vaccine scandal, even picked up some interesting quotations from the article shared. Comax87, however, has systematically attacked the messenger, avoiding discussing the issues presented, attributing to me I do not know what views and intentionally distorted the meaning of my text.

Shame for Red Hot Pawn that they keep such trolls in the forums.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89757
Clock
04 Nov 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eintaluj said
I do not talk with such users like kmax87. In the forum "Debates" they are creating noise, hindering real discussion and debate. In the present case, I shared an article about Pfizer's fresh vaccine scandal, even picked up some interesting quotations from the article shared. Comax87, however, has systematically attacked the messenger, avoiding discussing the issues presented ...[text shortened]... storted the meaning of my text.

Shame for Red Hot Pawn that they keep such trolls in the forums.
THERE IS NO NEW PFIZER SCANDAL!

Don’t you think if it was true that CNN, the BBC, Reuters and Al Jazeera would be running with it???

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
04 Nov 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@EintaluJ
There have been many of these kind of corporate corruption cases, like the CEO of Mitsubishi covering mechanical failure reports for thirty years, he had to resign in disgrace and they got a huge fine.

But that was decades ago, different folks in there now.

Would that stop you from buying a Mitsubishi if you wanted, presumably now the records are accurate and mechanical problems fixed?

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

Now, I have contemplated about this statistics. Only 5% of the lots were such that each lot contained a large number of vaccine shots. Exactly these lots were distributed all over the US and exactly these lots were responsible for some death cases. The remaining 95% of the lots were such that each lot contained a smaller number of vaccine shots and none of these caused any death.

The first impression, a plausible explanation is that something went wrong with this 5% of lots exactly because these lots contained a large number of shots. Either some failure in the production process or natural fluctuation, in any case, a failure to seriously test a large number of shots, perhaps because of the time pressure or economic reasons.

However, some experts are saying that such statistics is unprecedented in the case of vaccine production. And some of them are saying that natural explanations like the one I presented above are implausible.

Unfortunately, to evaluate such assertions the statistics presented is insufficient. Some additional information is required. That information is perhaps non-understandable to non-experts. Thus, once again, we depend on the opinions of the experts, opinions we cannot check and - as usual - these experts are of different opinion.

However, for ordinary people or non-experts, the explanation that there was some intention to sabotage the lots distributed for the masses, has some nonzero initial probability. While it is a conspiracy theory, it does not mean one should exclude it from the list of possible working explanations from the outset. It has often happened that some conspiracy theories have turned out to be true as it happened, for example, with Watergate.

The only relevant criterion of rationality is not to exclude that possibility from the very beginning and also not to firmly believe in that hypothesis as it has in no way been proved. An open mind should admit that many alternative explanations are available and we do not know yet which one of these is preferable.

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@EintaluJ
There have been many of these kind of corporate corruption cases, like the CEO of Mitsubishi covering mechanical failure reports for thirty years, he had to resign in disgrace and they got a huge fine.

But that was decades ago, different folks in there now.

Would that stop you from buying a Mitsubishi if you wanted, presumably now the records are accurate and mechanical problems fixed?
Why should I buy the production of some other firms if these other companies are as suspicious as Mitshubishi?

However, note that the vaccines are an important exception. You can choose whether to buy a mobile phone from Japan, South Korea, or China. You cannot choose whether to use Pfizer's nontraditional gene-experimental vaccine or one of those traditional vaccines produced in Russia or whether to use Interferon-2B as a medicament against coronavirus, because this medicament is produced based on Cuba's patent and Cuba's productions have been sanctioned by the US. Moreover, you do not have to use a smartphone or car. You can live without a smartphone and without a car. Not everyone has a car. But in the case of vaccines, vaccines are more or less compulsory, for some segments of the population they are strictly compulsory.

EintaluJ
PhD

Tallinn

Joined
08 Oct 21
Moves
2518
Clock
04 Nov 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse

Also: if you discover that something is wrong with your smartphone or car, you can stop using it before it is too late. If you discover that the vaccine you received causes deterioration of your health, you cannot get rid of it. It is already in your organism. The cars and mobile phones are not injected into your organism and you can cease using them. You can go as far from your car as you wish. But you are carrying your vaccine always inside yourself.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.