25 Jul 12
Originally posted by whodeyAnd how exactly does this support your assertion that the U.S. border with Mexico seems as if it is not patrolled?
Actually the crime rates seem to be going down around the immediate border on the US side. Just looking at this statistic one might assume that everything is just fine. However, Mexican gang violence has increased across the US. Also, violence along the Mexican border on the Mexican side is increasing as gangs fight for access points into the US.
25 Jul 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFMy point is that if they can keep track of cows in North Dakota, they have the capacity to run the border like Alcatraz......granted someone escaped from Alcatraz, but stop trying to side track me by bringing that up! 😠😛
And how exactly does this support your assertion that the U.S. border with Mexico seems as if it is not patrolled?
25 Jul 12
Originally posted by whodeyI am not sidetracking anything. I'm responding to a question you asked in your OP. How exactly does your point about gang violence in Mexico and in the U.S. support your assertion that the U.S. border with Mexico "seems as if it is not patrolled"? You brought it up, and now you seem to be trying to distance yourself from what you said.
My point is that if they can keep track of cows in North Dakota, they have the capacity to run the border like Alcatraz......granted someone escaped from Alcatraz, but stop trying to side track me by bringing that up! 😠😛
09 Aug 12
Well you know that the war on terror has now turned its attention as planned to "White AL CIA DA" They will be armed. Just another piece of high tech totalitarianism that needs to be in place. A little research will show how they have been used elsewhere in the world and are basically tools of assassins in the CIA.
09 Aug 12
Originally posted by normbenignWhat Franklin wrote was actually: "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Note the careful adjectival qualifications on Franklin's part, which make his statement more nuanced than your paraphrase.
Remember Ben Franklin's wise word on security and liberty. That one who would "sacrifice liberty for security deserves neither".
09 Aug 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Teinosuke" Note the careful adjectival qualifications on Franklin's part, which make his statement more nuanced than your paraphrase.[/b]
What Franklin wrote was actually: "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Note the careful adjectival qualifications on Franklin's part, which make his statement more nuanced than your paraphrase.
Good luck with that 🙂