@KellyJay saidFederal Government has nothing to do with abortions, it is not in the constitution, for starters.
What would happen next if all abortions were banned by law?
What would happen next if all guns were banned by law?
So look at the states. If you want abortion banned, you have to start a movement in your state. I would not sign any petition either way, as what a woman decides to do is her business. Query: If she gets a coat hanger and does it herself, could that be breaking the law of 'No abortions!!!"?
Guns!!?!??? Get real. You aint getting MY guns. Why, i shot 14 dove with my 16 just yesterday.
You worry me, Kelly. Government control of our lives and bodies? Kelly? Are you part ot the socialists here as well? You either is, or you ain't
95d
@KellyJay saidIt's just plain human rights.
For those who don't agree with you, are they all mentally handicapped or something? Difficult to see reasoning with you since you have low opinions of everyone not on the same page as you are.
One is the right to not be forced to carry a fetus to term, and the other is the right to not be killed in the street like a dog at the hands of an immature, testosterone-fueled idiot.
95d
@Suzianne saidSo says one who survived being a fetus to term and sees no value in them.
It's just plain human rights.
One is the right to not be forced to carry a fetus to term, and the other is the right to not be killed in the street like a dog at the hands of an immature, testosterone-fueled idiot.
95d
@AverageJoe1 saidYou don’t know friends from foes.
Federal Government has nothing to do with abortions, it is not in the constitution, for starters.
So look at the states. If you want abortion banned, you have to start a movement in your state. I would not sign any petition either way, as what a woman decides to do is her business. Query: If she gets a coat hanger and does it herself, could that be breaking the la ...[text shortened]... ves and bodies? Kelly? Are you part ot the socialists here as well? You either is, or you ain't
95d
@shavixmir saidThat also translates into a overly high opinion of yourself.
Oh, I have general low opinions of everyone.
But you have to admit that republicans do scrape the barrel of “human”.
95d
@shavixmir
Kelly have you noticed how much more substantive the posts are becoming. This one as an example.
95d
@AverageJoe1 saidEverytime someone answers you substantially, you reject the answer, because it’s not the answer you have in your head.
@shavixmir
Kelly have you noticed how much more substantive the posts are becoming. This one as an example.
This makes you very stupid. And it’s extremely annoying discussing subjects which are way over the heads of stupid people like you. And Kelly. And Mott. And Wajoma… hey, where is that koala raping basterd?
Oh well. Don’t miss him at all.
95d
@shavixmir saidI will let all of the funny but nasty things that came to mind pass. 🤝
Nope. Not really.
I find myself an obnoxious cvnt.
But, hey, at least I’m not a moron.
@shavixmir saidShow us all where I 'reject' any question.
Everytime someone answers you substantially, you reject the answer, because it’s not the answer you have in your head.
This makes you very stupid. And it’s extremely annoying discussing subjects which are way over the heads of stupid people like you. And Kelly. And Mott. And Wajoma… hey, where is that koala raping basterd?
Oh well. Don’t miss him at all.
Note To File: Kelly OP's this thread: He asks TWO questions, about abortion, and about guns. I myself answered them. This is why I am popular on threads.
Shav responded immediately "What sort of thread is this?" in expleteive fashion. Quite sickening to normal people, like myself, who answers threads. His next sentence implies that fellow posters are morons.
He effectively 'rejects the question'.
Loser.
95d
@AverageJoe1 saidThe answer Joe, you reject the answer.
Show us all where I 'reject' any question.
Note To File: Kelly OP's this thread: He asks TWO questions, about abortion, and about guns. I myself answered them. This is why I am popular on threads.
Shav responded immediately "What sort of thread is this?" in expleteive fashion. Quite sickening to normal people, like myself, who answers threads. His next sentence implies that fellow posters are morons.
He effectively 'rejects the question'.
Loser.
Thread after thread after thread.
It’s been pointed out to you a hundred times.
95d
@shavixmir saidShow thread after thread after thread, and, what else....oh, the hundred pointed-out times
The answer Joe, you reject the answer.
Thread after thread after thread.
It’s been pointed out to you a hundred times.