Now hold on everybody, I am just sending you something that I find interesting, nothing personal, it is right from the pages of Heritage Foundation. Love em or hate em> Certainly you can't hate ME!
That was 2 differences, here is the 3rd.
Conservatives and Progressives have a different view of 'We the People". Whether it is the Second Amendment, immigration or putting limits on abortion, if we the people don't pass laws which progressives approve, they turn to judges, executive orders, and government bureaucrats behind closed doors to overturn the will of voters.
Whatever one may think about the wisdom of hiking the minimum wage, banning plastic straws, or removing controversial historic monuments, conservatives believe that voters closest to the issues should be the ones making such decisions for their communities----not the lawmakers in Washington or a panel of judges five states away. (Yes!,, sorry, editorial note) .
To sum it up, conservatives believe in individual rights, not special rights ( I love that one ). Conservatives believe in allowing Texas to be Texas and Vermont to be Vermont (love that too), and conservatives believe 'We the People" can vote with our feet about where we want to live and what laws we want to live under.
Ahh,,,,,Liberty,, why didnt that say liberty!?!?
@AverageJoe1 Conservatives and Progressives have a different view of 'We the People".
Exactly. The pig progs think this means "We the democrat party".
@earl-of-trumps saidPig progs? Why is a stupid skunk bothered by pigs?
@AverageJoe1 Conservatives and Progressives have a different view of 'We the People".
Exactly. The pig progs think this means "We the democrat party".
@averagejoe1 saidDon't let the swinging doors hit you on the way out.
Anyway, I hope this post was good food for thought on all of our differences...,even though they left out that our definitions of independence freedom and liberty differ. Glad to be of service.
@earl-of-trumps saidWell, it is certainly not "We the Corporation".
@AverageJoe1 Conservatives and Progressives have a different view of 'We the People".
Exactly. The pig progs think this means "We the democrat party".
@averagejoe1 saidUnfortunately, hot air seems to lack any nourishment.
Anyway, I hope this post was good food for thought on all of our differences...,even though they left out that our definitions of independence freedom and liberty differ. Glad to be of service.
@handyandy saidThe day that Trump got elected the PIGS were already talking "impeachment".
Pig progs? Why is a stupid skunk bothered by pigs?
That is because PIGS don't want democracy, they want rule by PIGS. The PIGS lost the election and they can't accept it. And it has been three years of bitching by the PIGS ever since.
Kavanaugh gets nominated to the SJC. Whoa, say the PIGS. We can't let the SJC get more conservative! Ya, the PIGS have enjoyed lib rule in the SJC since the 1970's, and now that the scale has tipped, they can't stand it.
Yes, handy, PIGS. Power pigs. They refuse to accept anybody but "one of theirs" get elected or take power.
I have it right. Pigs don't want democracy, they demand THUGocracy.
@earl-of-trumps saidI could name at least a dozen things Trump did that would have ended up in the head of government being removed from office in any functional democracy. Only the most servile and slavish of bootlickers oppose the immediate dissolution of the Republican party and the resignation of all Republican officials.
The day that Trump got elected the PIGS were already talking "impeachment".
That is because PIGS don't want democracy, they want rule by PIGS. The PIGS lost the election and they can't accept it. And it has been three years of bitching by the PIGS ever since.
Kavanaugh gets nominated to the SJC. Whoa, say the PIGS. We can't let the SJC get more conservative! Ya, t ...[text shortened]... " get elected or take power.
I have it right. Pigs don't want democracy, they demand THUGocracy.
@kazetnagorra saidIn Donald Trump, you have a man that had NO HISTORY as a politician. How could the dems judge him in December of 2016 and going into January?
I could name at least a dozen things Trump did that would have ended up in the head of government being removed from office in any functional democracy. Only the most servile and slavish of bootlickers oppose the immediate dissolution of the Republican party and the resignation of all Republican officials.
They judge him by "He's not a D" - and that's all the PIGS care about.
onik
@earl-of-trumps saidWell, among other things, they could judge him for refusing to dealing with conflicts of interests as he is legally obliged to (laws Congress has refused to enforce). They could judge him for bribing an attorney general. They might have objected to his running of a scam university, his ties to Russian mobsters, his calls for the U.S. military to commit war crimes, his calls for the abolition of the First Amendment, and so on and so forth.
In Donald Trump, you have a man that had NO HISTORY as a politician. How could the dems judge him in December of 2016 and going into January?
They judge him by "He's not a D" - and that's all the PIGS care about.
onik
@earl-of-trumps saidI repeat, why is a stupid skunk bothered by pigs?
The day that Trump got elected the PIGS were already talking "impeachment".
That is because PIGS don't want democracy, they want rule by PIGS. The PIGS lost the election and they can't accept it. And it has been three years of bitching by the PIGS ever since.
Kavanaugh gets nominated to the SJC. Whoa, say the PIGS. We can't let the SJC get more conservative! Ya, t ...[text shortened]... " get elected or take power.
I have it right. Pigs don't want democracy, they demand THUGocracy.