01 Nov 08
Originally posted by generalissimoEven McCain has said that it isn't socialism. You need to stop listening to Rush.
why do you still insist with your ignorant support for Obama's socialism?
Obama calls for more tax benefits to individuals but more taxes on high-income earners. He would keep in place some of the Bush tax cuts and institute a permanent R&D credit. He would increase the maximum capital gains tax rate from 15% to 25%, tax hedge funds managers' share of ...[text shortened]... ions if they wish.
What do the two approaches have in common? Both could prove expensive.
01 Nov 08
Originally posted by generalissimoIt sounds like a step in the right direction to me.
why do you still insist with your ignorant support for Obama's socialism?
Obama calls for more tax benefits to individuals but more taxes on high-income earners. He would keep in place some of the Bush tax cuts and institute a permanent R&D credit. He would increase the maximum capital gains tax rate from 15% to 25%, tax hedge funds managers' share of ...[text shortened]... ions if they wish.
What do the two approaches have in common? Both could prove expensive.
What is your problem with it?
01 Nov 08
1 edit
Originally posted by howardgeeI know playing with your feces is just foreplay for you Howie, but keep it to yourself, there's kids here.
Ha ha, the poor losers AKA the republican's are begging for funds:
"...In an email to supporters the Arizona senator wrote: "I'm asking for your financial support today to help us respond to attacks against our entire ticket."..."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7700070.stm
I wouldn't give him the steam off my faeces.
Anyone reaching for the cheque book?
04 Nov 08
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterJust like you, I do have a quarrel with GeneralIdiot.
You sure are a nasty sort. First, you talk about playing with your own feces and then you rail at people whom you have no quarrel with. Clearly, something is not right with you.
Both of you spout nonsense, until proven incorrect...then suddenly you disappear from the thread without trace.
Please respond to my question on this thread:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=102873&page=6
05 Nov 08
Originally posted by howardgeeStill no reply, you coward!
Just like you, I do have a quarrel with GeneralIdiot.
Both of you spout nonsense, until proven incorrect...then suddenly you disappear from the thread without trace.
Please respond to my question on this thread:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=102873&page=6
05 Nov 08
Originally posted by howardgeeyou said: So, your argument is that because other countries have an unfair and immoral health care system which condemns the poor to a premature death, it's OK for America to have it too?
Still no reply, you coward!
Welcome to the America dream!!!!
******************************************
My response: America doesn't have an unfair and immoral health care system which condemns the poor to a premature death (hint: We have Medicaid, indigent hospitals where the poor pay nothing and free state children's health care). Also, it is not OK for America to have a universal health care system. If we went that route, then I'm sure it would lead to the horrible scenario you describe through rationing and endless bureaucracy, not to mention the cessation of all future pharmaceutical research and the development of state-of-the-art medical devices (which wouldn't be purchased any way because there'd never be enough money for them).
06 Nov 08
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterStill no reply, you coprophage!
you said: So, your argument is that because other countries have an unfair and immoral health care system which condemns the poor to a premature death, it's OK for America to have it too?
Welcome to the America dream!!!!
******************************************
My response: America doesn't have an unfair and immoral health care system ...[text shortened]... ices (which wouldn't be purchased any way because there'd never be enough money for them).
06 Nov 08
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterOnce again, you evade the question!
you said: So, your argument is that because other countries have an unfair and immoral health care system which condemns the poor to a premature death, it's OK for America to have it too?
Welcome to the America dream!!!!
******************************************
My response: America doesn't have an unfair and immoral health care system ...[text shortened]... ices (which wouldn't be purchased any way because there'd never be enough money for them).
"So will my Venezuelan relatives, Cuban refugees, and any other immigrant that values being rewarded for the work they do rather than for being a member of a special interest group."
What, by being forced to work for minimum wage lower in real terms than the 1950's thanks to Bush, without health care?
You really are a nasty piece of work.
As for your allusion to 1984, it is particularly ironic, given that your beloved leader illegally phone tapped his own people (i.e. you)- and got away with it scott free, of course. I bet that victory gin is leaving a bitter taste in your mouth now, dumbo.
So cummon, DSR, for the fourth time...have you got a nasty taste of victory gin in your mouth?
06 Nov 08
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenYeah, poor McCain, his wife is only worth 150 million. He might be down to his last 3 mansions....
Obama's the socialist who wants to spread the wealth--taking money from "those that can afford it".. Thus, why doesn't he give some money to McCain who has far less of it than him? Obama can afford it.