Go back
Biden Is Dictating, by paying Student loans

Biden Is Dictating, by paying Student loans

Debates

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d

@AverageJoe1 said
I have often corrected, as you have , that it does not pay off, but rather reduces debt to a certain formulated degree. It may apply $20k to an existing larger debt. We all know that.
So,now explain to sue that it is just like a tax cut. And for whom?, Is it tax cut for the plumber who did not go to college as he sees his taxes go to the debt of his neighbor's daughter?
Throw in the towel. Marauder.
Does a capital gains or corporation tax cut go to the plumber who didn't go to college? In 99% of cases no, but right wingers don't complain when they are put in place, do they?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d

@AverageJoe1 said
I have often corrected, as you have , that it does not pay off, but rather reduces debt to a certain formulated degree. It may apply $20k to an existing larger debt. We all know that.
So,now explain to sue that it is just like a tax cut. And for whom?, Is it tax cut for the plumber who did not go to college as he sees his taxes go to the debt of his neighbor's daughter?
Throw in the towel. Marauder.
Here's a simple example:

Guy A is making $50,000 a year and is paying 10% or $5,000 in federal taxes per year. So the government is anticipating revenues of $50,000 from him over the next ten years.

Instead, Congress enacts a tax cut reducing his yearly tax bill to $4,000. Now the government has its anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over that 10 years.

Guy B is making $50,000 a year and paying $5,000 a year to the Federal government in student loan payments. So the government is anticipating $50,000 in revenue from those payments over 10 years.

Instead, his payment is reduced by partial student loan foregiveness to $4,000 a year. Now the government has its anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over 10 years.

See now? That's keeping it simple for ya.

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147737
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
Here's a simple example:

Guy A is making $50,000 a year and is paying 10% or $5,000 in federal taxes per year. So the government is anticipating revenues of $50,000 from him over the next ten years.

Instead, Congress enacts a tax cut reducing his yearly tax bill to $4,000. Now the government has its anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over that 10 years.

Guy B ...[text shortened]... s anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over 10 years.

See now? That's keeping it simple for ya.
😂 idiot…there is no such thing as free money

what has happened is one group of people had their bill added to ALL tax payers. YOU, yes YOU are expected to pay for something you never received.

damn what some idiots, no wonder you cant figure out whether you are a man or woman…it’s a mental illness

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂 idiot…there is no such thing as free money

what has happened is one group of people had their bill added to ALL tax payers. YOU, yes YOU are expected to pay for something you never received.

damn what some idiots, no wonder you cant figure out whether you are a man or woman…it’s a mental illness
Apparently the example isn't simple enough for you to understand.

A foregiveness of debt owed to the government has the same effect as a tax cut.

Got it now?

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147737
Clock
191d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
Apparently the example isn't simple enough for you to understand.

A foregiveness of debt owed to the government has the same effect as a tax cut.

Got it now?
tax cuts affect EVERYONE dumbass.. not just one voter base

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d
1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople said
tax cuts affect EVERYONE dumbass.. not just one voter base
It depends on the tax cut. A cut in capital gains or corporate taxes or inheritance taxes or many others only directly affects a certain part of the "voter base".

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9631
Clock
191d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
It depends on the tax cut. A cut in capital gains or corporate taxes or inheritance taxes or many others only directly affects a certain part of the "voter base".
Mott's entire thesis about buying voters is so dumb.

Tax cuts for wealthy directly affects DONORS to political campaigns.

Tax cuts for student loan debt does not. That demographic does not donate to campaigns.

If Biden were using federal dollars to buy potential donors and voters, he would be doing what Republicans do. Cut corporate taxes and taxes for the wealthy, and send out checks with Trump's name on it to every single American in the country.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
Apparently the example isn't simple enough for you to understand.

A foregiveness of debt owed to the government has the same effect as a tax cut.

Got it now?
Got what? You explain nothing. Go back to point A. What is the 'nature' , if you will, of the money, the dollars, the $600B, and the word 'cost' which has found its way into the tuition discussions?? Remember you are talking to Sue and Sonhouse, and people like McHill, and you need to keep your pied-piper regalia intact.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
Here's a simple example:

Guy A is making $50,000 a year and is paying 10% or $5,000 in federal taxes per year. So the government is anticipating revenues of $50,000 from him over the next ten years.

Instead, Congress enacts a tax cut reducing his yearly tax bill to $4,000. Now the government has its anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over that 10 years.

Guy B ...[text shortened]... s anticipated revenue reduced by $10,000 over 10 years.

See now? That's keeping it simple for ya.
To Sue, et al. He leaves out that the government has a budget. It says that they must raise $1T a year. (anticipated revenue)
In this scenario, the law is changed where the govt will get $1000 (per person) less each year to fund that budget.

So, one day they are anticipating $1T, and the next day it is changed to where they will receive $1000 less than anticipated. This leaves Biden's money managers short on money, they are scratching their heads. They will no longer 'anticipate' the money that they were going to use to buy the illegal aliens motor scooters.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d

@AverageJoe1 said
To Sue, et al. He leaves out that the government has a budget. It says that they must raise $1T a year. (anticipated revenue)
In this scenario, the law is changed where the govt will get $1000 (per person) less each year to fund that budget.

So, one day they are anticipating $1T, and the next day it is changed to where they will receive $1000 less than anticipated. ...[text shortened]... longer 'anticipate' the money that they were going to use to buy the illegal aliens motor scooters.
Actually Biden's "money managers" have already came up with plans that more than make up for the paltry 1% or so of revenue foregone by forgiving some student loan debt. They do so by reversing the decades long trends of having the wealthy and corporations pay less. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-budget-plan-would-raise-us-taxes-by-4951-trillion-over-decade-treasury-2024-03-11/

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
Actually Biden's "money managers" have already came up with plans that more than make up for the paltry 1% or so of revenue foregone by forgiving some student loan debt. They do so by reversing the decades long trends of having the wealthy and corporations pay less. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-budget-plan-would-raise-us-taxes-by-4951-trillion-over-decade-treasury-2024-03-11/
No, that is not the answer to the money lost when we let the loser college graduates off the hook. Why don't you do a thread on the point you raise about Biden's managers.... it has ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING to do with the tuition discussions on this Forum. Jesus, you truly can never see an issue.

As an aside, Biden's principal WH economic advisor told an interviewer last month that if the Govt is short of money that they can just print more. I swear. I swear on my granny

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

I cant believe you are saying this, Marauder....talk abut grabbing at straws. So if my firm has decided to not require some client to pay back some money that we loaned him, we would just recoup it by finding some money that may be generated by some business matter in another department of the firm?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
Actually Biden's "money managers" have already came up with plans that more than make up for the paltry 1% or so of revenue foregone by forgiving some student loan debt. They do so by reversing the decades long trends of having the wealthy and corporations pay less. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-budget-plan-would-raise-us-taxes-by-4951-trillion-over-decade-treasury-2024-03-11/
Communist. Begin by punishing the successful.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
191d
1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
I cant believe you are saying this, Marauder....talk abut grabbing at straws. So if my firm has decided to not require some client to pay back some money that we loaned him, we would just recoup it by finding some money that may be generated by some business matter in another department of the firm?
You've never actually worked in any kind of business except maybe as a janitor or flipping burgers have you?

Yes, a way to "recoup" loan foregiveness is to get more revenue. Just like you would need to do if you cut revenue by other means like the government does when it enacts a tax cut.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55066
Clock
191d

@no1marauder said
You've never actually worked in any kind of business except maybe as a janitor or flipping burgers have you?

Yes, a way to "recoup" loan foregiveness is to get more revenue. Just like you would need to do if you cut revenue by other means like the government does when it enacts a tax cut.
So, applying what you say here to the tuition thingy, I think you are acknowledging a need to recoup loan revenue. You mean then, to recoup what WOULD have been paid back by the borrower/student.
So, no money is coming from the students....but money (from govt) is in fact being used to pay that which the students do not pay. Am I right so far?

Your solution is to 'get more revenue'. Thus, you are getting more revenue for one purpose......to replace the govt money that went to pay the tuitions.

Marauder, you have now confirmed that money is paid by the govt, cash money, to the holders of the loans.

I have asked you to confirm that for about 6 months, what was the purpose of all of your word games from the ever-lovin' high horse?
I know....you are a contrarian, that is all you know.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.