07 Dec 23
@AverageJoe1
Everyone note the way Kev will attempt to work around (or just not answer) this question, it being "Are you not aware of the evidence against the Bidens?'
07 Dec 23
@sonhouse saidSonhouse, the 22 pieces of evidence are anything but 'distractions'.
@Suzianne
It's the old say anything that will distract from the criminality of their god king Trump.
I notice the Biden impeachment isn't going so well for repubs now, for instance. ANYTHING to distract from Trump and his fascist push.
The repub party is not even pretending to be interested in actual policy, ONLY in getting at whatever dem they can in their zeal for revenge and power, PERMANENT power.
Oh, can you close your sentence,,,,"I notice the Biden impeachment isnt going to well for repubs now."
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
08 Dec 23
@ponderable saidI DID provide the specific quote when asked.
That is exactly how not to debate. You have been asked for a specific quote. YOu brought it up it your responsability to make your point clear. Otherwise the point is moot.
08 Dec 23
1 edit
@jj-adams saidHow dare you.
Why does he get away with it?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sean-hannity-biden-is-lying-right-to-your-face/vi-AA1l7Fob?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=9f99cf918282479680ab7f5f534b637b&ei=11
You supported a president who told over 30,000 lies while in office, and you expect us to believe you're offended by this?
09 Dec 23
@AverageJoe1
22 pieces of evidence? There are 91 charges and hundreds of pages of evidence. Which you no doubt would hope it would all go away so you don't have to be forced to make a choice which you wouldn't anyway, you will vote for T no matter how much jail time he gets.
If he is somehow not able to be the nominee it will most likely be Nikki, I assume since she is about as right wing as it is possible for a human to be, you would vote for her in a trice.
There are court proceedings going on right now that invokes the 14th amendment which says anyone running for fed or state office committing insurrection will not be allowed to be on the ballot so it might be he will be a few states short, and lose out automatically in those states and a big shift to dems there since there would be no dissenting repub votes for POTUS, even if folks do a write in, their votes will not be counted because he would be unable to run in those states. Some of those charges will go all the way to SCOTUS. I don't know who would be worse for POTUS, Trump or Nikki. I guess it would have to be Trump even if Nikki is ultrarightwing she couldn't possibly be as radical as Trump has become in the last couple years.
09 Dec 23
2 edits
@sonhouse saidNo, no, no, no… The 22 pieces of evidence regard the biden case, not the Trump case. Who said anything about Trump? You seem to sometimes be thinking about Trump when you’re trying to write about something else. I wonder what that’s all No, no, no, no… The 22 pieces of evidence regard the Biden case, not the trump case. You seem to sometimes be thinking about Trumpwhen you’re trying to write about something else. I wonder what that’s all about.?
@AverageJoe1
22 pieces of evidence? There are 91 charges and hundreds of pages of evidence. Which you no doubt would hope it would all go away so you don't have to be forced to make a choice which you wouldn't anyway, you will vote for T no matter how much jail time he gets.
If he is somehow not able to be the nominee it will most likely be Nikki, I assume since she is abo ...[text shortened]... is ultrarightwing she couldn't possibly be as radical as Trump has become in the last couple years.
Trump?
Hey……bad move to persecute Trump, he has become a martyr and much stronger.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
09 Dec 23
@suzianne saidNot that silly 30,000 lies nonsense again.
How dare you.
You supported a president who told over 30,000 lies while in office, and you expect us to believe you're offended by this?
His "lies" as the WaPo claims are just typical political hyperbole about what a great job he's done, etc..
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-lies-false-presidency-b1790285.html
Joe Biden's lies are silly stupid easily disproven falsehoods that are the sign of a diseased mind, and he's been doing it all his life, claiming he's been places and done things that are too weird to be believed..
09 Dec 23
1 edit
@jj-adams saidEric Schwerin, was Joe Biden's bookkeeper from 2009-17:
Why does he get away with it?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sean-hannity-biden-is-lying-right-to-your-face/vi-AA1l7Fob?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=9f99cf918282479680ab7f5f534b637b&ei=11
""Notably, Mr. Schwerin, who served as then-Vice President Biden's bookkeeper from 2009 to 2017, explained that he was not aware of any transactions into or out of the then-Vice President's bank account related to business conducted by any Biden family member," the spokesperson said in a statement."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/who-is-eric-schwerin-oversight-dems-confirm-hunter-s-business-partner-managed-joe-biden-s-finances-during-vp-tenure/ar-AA1gL6Mz
How shocking he was sent 54 e-mails from Joe Biden.
@jj-adams saidAwww, shoot. I was hoping for a direct response from the venerable Marauder to your post, hereinabove. Yours is a very good explanation of Trump and Biden comparisons. We know Donald is a blowhard, blah blah, that is his nature as he made america great again. Biden, on the other hand, has a plethora of evidence against him for plagiarism and outright lies, beginning in his early years, starting with 'top of my class' in PoliSci or some such, when he was 3rd from the bottom. Kinda sad, when you think about it. This nature of his makes his lies, which are REAL lies, dementia or not, a whole lot different than a bit of political license to do a bit of blowharding.
Not that silly 30,000 lies nonsense again.
His "lies" as the WaPo claims are just typical political hyperbole about what a great job he's done, etc..
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-lies-false-presidency-b1790285.html
Joe Biden's lies are silly stupid easily disproven falsehoods that are the sign of a diseased mind, and he's been doing it all his life, claiming he's been places and done things that are too weird to be believed..
Maybe Marauder will add a bit of interesting tid bits about your post. I saw where he sent some link about something. If you read it, did it pertain to your post? Or, was it some extraneous other problem that Joe has. Maybe it proves Joe is innocent of some nefarious stuff, but does it pertain to your post, which ain't nunthin innocent about it?
09 Dec 23
@AverageJoe1
I was curious, so just looked a Marauder's post. Looks like the issue Marauder has dug up proves Joe to be as innocent as a lamb.....it is about a financial expert checking out Joe's finances.. while VP.
Ahhhh, but tell us,,Marauder, why do you libs, and us to, feel the need to dig into Joe's finances? Just a question.
09 Dec 23
@averagejoe1 saidI have no interest in comparing Trump to Biden, so why should I waste my time responding to that post?
Awww, shoot. I was hoping for a direct response from the venerable Marauder to your post, hereinabove. Yours is a very good explanation of Trump and Biden comparisons. We know Donald is a blowhard, blah blah, that is his nature as he made america great again. Biden, on the other hand, has a plethora of evidence against him for plagiarism and outright lies, beginning i ...[text shortened]... nt of some nefarious stuff, but does it pertain to your post, which ain't nunthin innocent about it?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
09 Dec 23
@averagejoe1 saidMarauder is nuts. He takes opposing anti-mainstream positions just to be cool..
Awww, shoot. I was hoping for a direct response from the venerable Marauder to your post, hereinabove. Yours is a very good explanation of Trump and Biden comparisons. We know Donald is a blowhard, blah blah, that is his nature as he made america great again. Biden, on the other hand, has a plethora of evidence against him for plagiarism and outright lies, beginning i ...[text shortened]... nt of some nefarious stuff, but does it pertain to your post, which ain't nunthin innocent about it?
09 Dec 23
@no1marauder saidEveryone, a classic example of responding only to posts when it is convenient or suits a narrative. My post was too simple, which is always the real reason that libs cannot handle them.
I have no interest in comparing Trump to Biden, so why should I waste my time responding to that post?
And funny that Marauder discounts the 'very idea' that we compare the two!!!!!~!~
Help me Rhonda. 🤔