@wolfgang59 saidyou conflate a personal situation with govt benefits.
If someone said they had no problem with mott's lifestyle.
But said they had a problem with mott be treated the same as others.
How would that feel?
What about if those saying such things wielded power and authority?
@kevcvs57 saidSo what, Kev? I mean really?!?!?
The Russians are a hostile foreign government earl. That’s the difference.
Show me why Russians have no right to free speech in America - especially when all they are doing is making public
the things that Democrats have said in private emails.
I have no problem with that.
Did you object when Obama threw his weight behind Macron?? Donate to his election campaign?
"... but see,... that's different"
Uh huh.
@earl-of-trumps saidOMG earl if they were doing it publicly, then although they might get a rebuke and it could well be counterproductive it wouldn’t really be an issue because the electorate would be aware of the source and could judge it accordingly.
So what, Kev? I mean really?!?!?
Show me why Russians have no right to free speech in America - especially when all they are doing is making public
the things that Democrats have said in private emails.
I have no problem with that.
Did you object when Obama threw his weight behind Macron?? Donate to his election campaign?
"... but see,... that's different"
Uh huh.
But unlike Obama, Trump and his Russian cohorts like to do things a little more covertly.
@kevcvs57 saidThere ya go again.
OMG earl if they were doing it publicly, then although they might get a rebuke and it could well be counterproductive it wouldn’t really be an issue because the electorate would be aware of the source and could judge it accordingly.
But unlike Obama, Trump and his Russian cohorts like to do things a little more covertly.
Show me one thing Trump did to facilitate the theft of Democrat emails. Dare ya.
Especially when the theft occurred before he was elected.
Go for it. I'll await your response. Use links when possible.