145d
@wildgrass saidYou are right they don’t seem to care!
It's a free country mate, and the parties control the nomination process. Not everyone likes the two party system but it's what we settled on. Interesting that the protest from you is coming as an outsider but you don't see too many Democrats complaining right now. It seems they're mostly on board.
145d
@Suzianne saidYour party if you’re going to accept it all who am I?
"Silenced"? The "Party powerful"? What are you on?
Are you so old that it's too difficult to learn anything?
Stop listening to your party.
Not everyone is as evil as they.
There are no "boogeymen".
Why do you continue to live in America if you do not believe in her legacy?
145d
@AverageJoe1
Something I am sure you will find an excuse NOT to read:
Trump's LIES during the debate:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-misinformation-election-debate-trump-biden-577507522762aa10f6ee5be3a0ced2bb
145d
@AverageJoe1 saidTell me the nature of the "consideration" the government gets for making it so the bankrupt person or entity doesn't have to pay it's debts.
Who said anything about writing checks. Did I say that,...in what context.
But even if I did, it is to point out that the holder of the loan, the govt, 3rd door office on the right, is waiting for some instrument, maybe a check or a Money Transfer, which I do every day. It will be applied to the subject loan accordingly to reduce the balance owed on it.
So we ...[text shortened]... he nature of consideration received by that burser to apply to, and reduce the balance of, the loan.
145d
@no1marauder saidI have made a post error, apologies. Still have your unbelieveable (incorrect) understanding of the Tuition Conundrum in mind, and wrote this in the bankruptcy squabble.....I assume this is what you are referring to. Sorry, you are confused enough without having to see what in the hell I meant.
Tell me the nature of the "consideration" the government gets for making it so the bankrupt person or entity doesn't have to pay it's debts.
______________________________________________________________
"""" it be in effect money?
I think we are getting somewhere. Tell us the nature of consideration received by that burser to apply to, and reduce the balance of, the loan.""""
_________________________________________________
I refer here to money transferring from one dept to another, where the loan is overseen by the burser, who is about to have the loan reduced by, I think, $20K.
WHAT!!??? A dollar amount. So here is the question on tuition joust... If you say there is NO money, what is this pesky $20K.
145d
So, my post on P 13 had the two subjects, not very smart, but that is how the previous questions were written to me.
First subject was tutitin 2nd subject bankruptcy.
I wrote fantastic responses, even with a precious anaology about crossing the street on the bankruptcy subject, but then accidentally ended my response witih a tuition response
145d
@wildgrass saidDefine people as you will, you do that a lot.
That's because they're not in a cult.
145d
@wildgrass saidMost voters want their vote to count when they make it, not make it then have someone who didn't like how things were going to change the process on the fly to insert someone else. They have no say because their votes are gone and no new process will give them their say back.
You're bringing up the caring bit. Most voters vote for policy not specific politicians.
145d
@wildgrass saidMost voters vote for policy not specific politicians.
You're bringing up the caring bit. Most voters vote for policy not specific politicians.
That's part of the problem with Trump: he does not do policy. His whole attitude to government is transactional, making deals. This is one of the reasons businessmen should not be running the govt.
@moonbus saidDeals are the results of negotiations. It is that simple.
Most voters vote for policy not specific politicians.
That's part of the problem with Trump: he does not do policy. His whole attitude to government is transactional, making deals. This is one of the reasons businessmen should not be running the govt.
And deals are best made by businessmen who can negotiate....There is no better negotiator than Trump, up against any opponent on the globe, in the world.
So, would you send Kacklin' Kamala in to a room with Putin, or Kim, or Xi? What if those 3 got together to chat with her?
Why will you not be honest and say....No, i must admit, Trump would be the best.
Well, say SOMETHING!!
145d
@moonbus saidYou actually say Trump would not be good at making deals. Help Me Rhonda.
Most voters vote for policy not specific politicians.
That's part of the problem with Trump: he does not do policy. His whole attitude to government is transactional, making deals. This is one of the reasons businessmen should not be running the govt.
@AverageJoe1 saidDeals are nothing without solid policy and directed leadership
You actually say Trump would not be good at making deals. Help Me Rhonda.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
145d
@wildgrass said😂 doesnt make sense
Deals are nothing without solid policy and directed leadership