Bidens: $20M proven. Y'all just don't know this.

@averagejoe1 said
And Mueller? Years, and $30Mm. You are thinking oh yes, I should’ve use that as an example. Ha, ha ha ha

Alll of ‘you guys’ (why does that sound so queer to me?…. ). need to regroup with your narrative .as you have offered nothing on these posts.
This will hurt your feelings, but I get a lot more news from Fox and Breitbart

You mean the Mueller who indicted 37 criminals, 7 plead guilty and 5 went to prison, 11 criminal referrals to other law enforcement agencies, found "sweeping and systemic" Russian interference in elections, foreign targeting of election data, etc etc?

He wasn't looking. He found.

@wildgrass said
You mean the Mueller who indicted 37 criminals, 7 plead guilty and 5 went to prison, 11 criminal referrals to other law enforcement agencies, found "sweeping and systemic" Russian interference in elections, foreign targeting of election data, etc etc?

He wasn't looking. He found.

what did he find on Trump?

@no1marauder said
Well rather than making a dozen threads a week about how Comer, Fox News, Breitbart and the rest are still "looking" why don't you wait until they do some actual "finding"?

Because debating with y'all is a slam dunk, goes perfect with my jack Daniels. Like Wildgrass just mentioned Ken Starr, ancient history, but does not mention the Mueller debacle, where, even with fake dossier and lies to FiFA, NOTHING was found. I won that post without hardly responding to it. No grit, you know what I mean. And how about these characters writing about Jared Kurshner.....what in the world? Surely Hunter is more fun. Have you seen the Laptop? I wonder if he wanted it to be discovered.
That is really weak debating, and thus, entertaining. Have I ever lost a debate? And note i do not need 'Link Props' to make my points. The People want to know what I think, not what a link-meister thinks, no offense.

@wildgrass said
You mean the Mueller who indicted 37 criminals, 7 plead guilty and 5 went to prison, 11 criminal referrals to other law enforcement agencies, found "sweeping and systemic" Russian interference in elections, foreign targeting of election data, etc etc?

He wasn't looking. He found.

Collateral damage, don't you know....
Next you will say that Trump should have known fully all about these guys. We had a lawyer in our firm who took advantage of a secretary, we were able to get it settled, but how would we have known of his inclinations? A good lawyer, too. Fired him.
So give us something to discuss, but can you be current. Someone here mentioned Ken Starr a post or two back! Ken Starr!! Oh, hell, it was YOU!

@averagejoe1 said
Because debating with y'all is a slam dunk, goes perfect with my jack Daniels. Like Wildgrass just mentioned Ken Starr, ancient history, but does not mention the Mueller debacle, where, even with fake dossier and lies to FiFA, NOTHING was found. I won that post without hardly responding to it. No grit, you know what I mean. And how about these characters writing abou ...[text shortened]... o make my points. The People want to know what I think, not what a link-meister thinks, no offense.

The degree to which you pander to the clueless right is, frankly, embarrassing.

Posts like this, even more so.

You're almost as obsequious as Fox News.

@mott-the-hoople said
what did he find on Trump?

He didn't find nothing. Rooted out a bunch of criminals. If a federal investigator asks you a question and you have not committed any crimes and have nothing to hide, why would anyone refuse to answer?

@suzianne said
The degree to which you pander to the clueless right is, frankly, embarrassing.

Posts like this, even more so.

You're almost as obsequious as Fox News.

How do you know ( conservative or repub, whaever) that the right is clueless. Link!?!?!?!? Can you send a link?!?!?!? Geez.
Put real conversation where your fingers are. I am sitting here, I honor all you kids with a Jack Daniels while I field the not-closed posts. Did you see where Wildgrass (or somebody, no difference) wrote about Jared Krushner with all this Hunter crap going on?
Y'all are all so obvious, so easy. Do you think he can give us a few lines on Hunter? Hunter Biden?

@wildgrass said
He didn't find nothing. Rooted out a bunch of criminals. If a federal investigator asks you a question and you have not committed any crimes and have nothing to hide, why would anyone refuse to answer?

You dare ask that question? That a person being investigated, if innocent, should answer questions?
Now i KNOW you are not keeping up with the news. Do you know that FBI called Catholics potential terrorists? No you don't, but tell us what you think about that.

@wildgrass said
He didn't find nothing. Rooted out a bunch of criminals. If a federal investigator asks you a question and you have not committed any crimes and have nothing to hide, why would anyone refuse to answer?

“ He didn't find nothing”. (anything)

bingo, now stfu with your lies

@mott-the-hoople said
“ He didn't find nothing”. (anything)

bingo, now stfu with your lies

Sorry I guess I'm not good at ignoring the existence of convicted criminals.

@wildgrass said
Sorry I guess I'm not good at ignoring the existence of convicted criminals.

more like world class expert

@wildgrass said
Sorry I guess I'm not good at ignoring the existence of convicted criminals.

But you ignore criminals who were not convicted, like Hillary. Sorry, but your unclosed, not-closed posts simply must be dealt with. Or, heaven forbid, we will not get the point.
Your post really sucks WGrass. We can work with you though, just try to reason clearly. Logic, common sense, rationale. That's it. The new Wildgrass!!!

@averagejoe1 said
How do you know ( conservative or repub, whaever) that the right is clueless. Link!?!?!?!? Can you send a link?!?!?!? Geez.
Put real conversation where your fingers are. I am sitting here, I honor all you kids with a Jack Daniels while I field the not-closed posts. Did you see where Wildgrass (or somebody, no difference) wrote about Jared Krushner with all t ...[text shortened]... 'all are all so obvious, so easy. Do you think he can give us a few lines on Hunter? Hunter Biden?

Who?

@mott-the-hoople said
“ He didn't find nothing”. (anything)

bingo, now stfu with your lies

This from the right, whose spiritual leader, the king of presidential lies, is still the record holder.

@averagejoe1 said
But you ignore criminals who were not convicted, like Hillary. Sorry, but your unclosed, not-closed posts simply must be dealt with. Or, heaven forbid, we will not get the point.
Your post really sucks WGrass. We can work with you though, just try to reason clearly. Logic, common sense, rationale. That's it. The new Wildgrass!!!

Nope. I did not ignore. Someone should prosecute. But Mott's insistence that Mueller found nothing is silly in light of the very real individuals he put in prison.