20 Jun 20
@no1marauder saidAh, I see. So it's personal.
Apparently Grant owned a slave at one point. And he wrote in 1863: "“I never was an abolitionist, Grant wrote to his friend and patron, Elihu Washburne, in 1863, “not even what could be called anti-slavery…”
https://acwm.org/blog/myths-misunderstandings-grant-slaveholder/
I guess that group of protestors find that insufficient opposition to slavery to justify a public statute.
Efforts to end slavery are not important. It's only important if someone owned a slave before slavery was abolished.
20 Jun 20
@lemon-lime saidTo some apparently.
Ah, I see. So it's personal.
Efforts to end slavery are not important. It's only important if someone owned a slave before slavery was abolished.
20 Jun 20
@no1marauder saidwould it be “trivial to take down a mlk statue?
It's kinda dumb to take such statutes down but not worth a police riot to stop such trivial violations.