23 Apr 09
Originally posted by hannibal200der schwartz ritter
Who was this DSR about whom so much fuss is being made?
User 206200
23 Apr 09
Originally posted by scherzoOh no - they do not. This is a "benevolent??" dictatorship in whose mind rests the only template for content of any sort and their decisions are final.
They give several warnings.
I posted a quite tame bit of humour in 'general forms' concerning the topic of women, beer, golf and men being 'taken advantage of'. I receiced no explaination of any word or phrase found objectionable in the joke, nor was there any word that has not appeared in these forums numerous times, however it was removed immediately.
Even so, in it's brief life it recieved 3 recc's!!!
Based on this experience I am convinced mods are of the fairer sex and without sense of humour. Anyone who would enjoy reading the piece......PM me and I will send it to you in private....
23 Apr 09
Originally posted by MacSwainBe careful. The mods are listening to EVERYTHING YOU POST.
Oh no - they do not. This is a "benevolent??" dictatorship in whose mind rests the only template for content of any sort and their decisions are final.
I posted a quite tame bit of humour in 'general forms' concerning the topic of women, beer, golf and men being 'taken advantage of'. I receiced no explaination of any word or phrase found objectionable in ...[text shortened]... ne who would enjoy reading the piece......PM me and I will send it to you in private....
23 Apr 09
Originally posted by MacSwainOr of the 'gay'sex? I should like to read your joke and should be grateful if you would PM it to me.
[Based on this experience I am convinced mods are of the fairer sex and without sense of humour. Anyone who would enjoy reading the piece......PM me and I will send it to you in private....[/b]
23 Apr 09
Originally posted by Phil jacksonWould it bother you if a homosexual is in control of which posts of yours will see the light of day?
Or of the 'gay'sex? I should like to read your joke and should be grateful if you would PM it to me.
Because, if so, then yes. I'm oiled up and ready to go cowboy!
24 Apr 09
Originally posted by CrowleyYou sound just the type they appoint as 'moderators' here, like the Great Moderator himself.
Would it bother you if a homosexual is in control of which posts of yours will see the light of day?
Because, if so, then yes. I'm oiled up and ready to go cowboy!
24 Apr 09
Bring Back Der Schwarze Ritter indeed!
Apart from a few throw away comments from General Forum retrobates who spend no time at debates, he's only got the likes of Phil Jackson and generalissimo sticking up for him. What a humiliation! Not a single poster of substance or repute.
24 Apr 09
Originally posted by FMFThe only reason why DSR has been banned and not the muzlim racists who openly support those who advocate 'wiping Israel off the map' is that the 'moderators' are biased in your favour. Nothing to boast about.
Bring Back Der Schwarze Ritter indeed!
Apart from a few throw away comments from General Forum retrobates who spend no time at debates, he's only got the likes of Phil Jackson and generalissimo sticking up for him. What a humiliation! Not a single poster of substance or repute.
24 Apr 09
Originally posted by Phil jacksonI assume it's a TOS problem. That's life in a private sector environment. This is not a democracy. I don't see how bias could have been a factor. DSR's rights were defined by the TOS. The site owners rights are also defined there.
The only reason why DSR has been banned and not the muzlim racists who openly support those who advocate 'wiping Israel off the map' is that the 'moderators' are biased in your favour. Nothing to boast about.
