Originally posted by whodeyIf she was lied to about torture, by the CIA, wouldn't you - as an American citizen - be concerned or even angry?
UPDATE!! Nancy Pelosi is now declining to answer any more questions regarding the matter after her retorts seem to have generated more controversy than had she otherwise kept her trap shut. LOL. I guess all she can hope for now is to pretent it never happened in the first place and hope it all goes away.
Originally posted by whodeyShes praying it will go away alright! If there is any true journalist left in the main stream media they wont let this die. For FMF ,FOX NEWS is are only hope!
UPDATE!! Nancy Pelosi is now declining to answer any more questions regarding the matter after her retorts seem to have generated more controversy than had she otherwise kept her trap shut. LOL. I guess all she can hope for now is to pretent it never happened in the first place and hope it all goes away.
Originally posted by FMFI would think that as a Congressional member and a speaker of the house to boot, she should be the one angry and demanding answers as to why she was lied to. However, now that she seems to be backing down and laying low, it now appears that she is the one lying. And yes, it makes me angry. ðŸ˜
If she was lied to about torture, by the CIA, wouldn't you - as an American citizen - be concerned or even angry?
Originally posted by FMFIf she was lied to I would be angry but as I said, it now looks like she is the one lying and not the CIA.
Uh? What makes you angry? I'm not talking about now. I asked a specific question about the past: If she was lied to about torture, by the CIA, wouldn't you - as an American citizen - be concerned or even angry?
Originally posted by utherpendragonI hear that her approval ratings are lower than Bush and Cheney!! 😲
If the cia lied and always lies, as she claimed, I know I would be angry. But thats not the case. It is obvious to a duck that SHE is lying. The way the way the senior Dems and the White house are distancing themselves is strong sign of that alone
If they are any kind of politicians, distance themselves from her they must.
Originally posted by whodeyLIES....ALL LIES ! Nancy is still speaking. However, it would appear that the bungee cords holding the corners of her mouth to the bottom of her ear lobes have done sprung and she now sounds like an incoherent platypus.
UPDATE!! Nancy Pelosi is now declining to answer any more questions regarding the matter after her retorts seem to have generated more controversy than had she otherwise kept her trap shut. LOL. I guess all she can hope for now is to pretent it never happened in the first place and hope it all goes away.
GRANNY.
Originally posted by utherpendragonCould it not be that "senior Dems and the White house" don't want to get manouvered into a situation where they are under pressure to prosecute Bush and Co? Politics in Europe is quite a sophisticated and wheels-within-wheels kind of thing (maybe even more so here in Indonesia). Surely it may all be a bit deeper and more complex than 'the person I don't like is a liar - the people I like are telling the truth'. Is U.S. politics really as simple to dissect as that?
The way the way the senior Dems and the White house are distancing themselves is strong sign of [the fact that she is lying] alone
Originally posted by FMFwell disliking her for me has nothing to do w/it honestly. As far as the people I like ? The CIA ? no. The Repubs? no. I may be wrong but I doubt it. She has changed her story about 5 times. Her body language speaks volumes. Nobody else is coroberating (sp?) her claims, these are all signs to me she is lying. One,about not being held privy and going along w/the torture and two that it was the CIA Lying to congress and they always lie to congress
Could it not be that "senior Dems and the White house" don't want to get manouvered into a situation where they are under pressure to prosecute Bush and Co? Politics in Europe is quite a sophisticated and wheels-within-wheels kind of thing (maybe even more so here in Indonesia). Surely it may all be a bit deeper and more complex than 'the person I don't like is ...[text shortened]... eople I like are telling the truth'. Is U.S. politics really as simple to dissect as that?
Originally posted by FMFMaybe not 5, but several.
What are those five versions of her story?
I never knew.
There was a briefing but I wasn't there.
I was briefed but it wasn't what they said.
yadayadayada, blah blah blah
I feel sorry for her, she is about to be crucified because on the spur of the moment she took the easy way out and had to keep up the charade.
"Oh what a wicked web we weave when first we practice to decieve"
Originally posted by Sam The ShamWell that's three. And two of them are perhaps the same thing. So that's two. What's this talk of five? It's starting to sound a bit like you and utherpendragon and whodey might be lying about Pelosi. It wouldn't surprise me. OK. Someone else said five - so we'll wait for him to explain what those five stories were.
I never knew.
There was a briefing but I wasn't there.
I was briefed but it wasn't what they said.
You claim there were three different stories - although the difference between them isn't clear. Can you tell me exactly WHEN her 'current' story was each of these:
(A) I never knew.
(B) There was a briefing but I wasn't there.
(C) I was briefed but it wasn't what they said.
(D) You added: "yadayadayada, blah blah blah". Does this mean there was a fourth story? What are you referring to? Is "yadayadayada, blah blah blah" further evidence against her? What are the details? Are you saying she's told three different stories or four different stories?
Do you have any links?
Gleeful partisan ramblings about deers caught in headlights, about her body language, wicked webs people weave, lesser forms of life, sly remarks about her sexuality, these things are not a case against her. Do you have specific details about the "lies" she is supposed to have told - about these multiple conflicting stories she has told?