Originally posted by jammerdifficult to answer, dont know what a stink bush is
Want it both ways huh?
At least be honest with yourself .. re-read your original post and then say again .."no offense is (wss) intended"
................................................................
Which smells worse, a stink bush or your Mothers bush?
Just a bit of light banter .. and no offense is intended.
Originally posted by jammerand winner of the most ridiculous post ever goes to... jammer
Want it both ways huh?
At least be honest with yourself .. re-read your original post and then say again .."no offense is (wss) intended"
................................................................
Which smells worse, a stink bush or your Mothers bush?
Just a bit of light banter .. and no offense is intended.
Originally posted by rooktakesqueenGeorge Bush is extremely intelligent. He has never lost an election (unless you somehow consider the democrats taking over a personal loss for him). He is one of the most powerful men in our government, and he was well before he became president. He was able to put together a group of people that convinced and tricked an entire nation into being behind a war that might have been a bad idea.
what's smarter, george bush or a rose bush?
In fact, some of the worst people on our planet have also been the smartest. It would be ridiculous to say that Hitler was dumb, that Stalin was a moron or that Mao was stupid.
This guy is no pushover and anybody who thinks otherwise is just following the "I hate Bush" bandwagon. I don't like him much either, but at least I'm not a sheep.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterThe fact that you believe anything that the ncpa publishes is quite enough to discredit you from having any sort of intelligent input into any discussion other than perhaps "what colour is you favourite tellytubby".
I'm not worried, since the Bush tax cuts have vastly increased government revenues as well as employment:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?page=article&Article_ID=13989
Originally posted by scottishinnzRead a little closer quarter-wit -- the story is from the Wall Street Journal. And by the way, aren't you a little too old for ad hominem attacks? I guess not, since your so interested in Teletubbies.
The fact that you believe anything that the ncpa publishes is quite enough to discredit you from having any sort of intelligent input into any discussion other than perhaps "what colour is you favourite tellytubby".