- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147486
165d
…Sits in on West Wing Meetings with President
“In another irony, Hunter Biden was once involved in schemes to provide access to the White House for his foreign business partners when his father was vice president during the Obama administration.Now he has direct access.
It is unclear whether Hunter Biden has passed any kind of security check or background check, and it is also not clear what kind of meetings he is attending with his father, and what sorts of policy decisions are made with him present.”
165d
@Mott-The-Hoople saidImagine if convicted felons started running for political office. The horror...
…Sits in on West Wing Meetings with President
“In another irony, Hunter Biden was once involved in schemes to provide access to the White House for his foreign business partners when his father was vice president during the Obama administration.Now he has direct access.
It is unclear whether Hunter Biden has passed any kind of security check or background che ...[text shortened]... he is attending with his father, and what sorts of policy decisions are made with him present.”
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt is unclear whether Hunter Biden has passed any kind of security check or background check, and it is also not clear what kind of meetings he is attending with his father, and what sorts of policy decisions are made with him present.”
…Sits in on West Wing Meetings with President
“In another irony, Hunter Biden was once involved in schemes to provide access to the White House for his foreign business partners when his father was vice president during the Obama administration.Now he has direct access.
It is unclear whether Hunter Biden has passed any kind of security check or background che ...[text shortened]... he is attending with his father, and what sorts of policy decisions are made with him present.”
The same can be said of Steve Bannon, Bill Stepien, Jason Miller, the Russians Trump invited into the oval office, or the many false statements Jared Kushner wrote on his security application. In addition, Hunter is not the convicted felon running for President, some guy named Trump is. But I guess we're supposed to only focus on Hunter Biden - right?
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't - - - 😏
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147486
165d
@wildgrass saidthe people would have a say in it then wouldnt they?
Imagine if convicted felons started running for political office. The horror...
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147486
165d
@mchill saidwhich of those sat in on meetings when they had a background of selling our country out to the highest bidder?
It is unclear whether Hunter Biden has passed any kind of security check or background check, and it is also not clear what kind of meetings he is attending with his father, and what sorts of policy decisions are made with him present.”
The same can be said of Steve Bannon, Bill Stepien, Jason Miller, the Russians Trump invited into the oval office, or the many false st ...[text shortened]... upposed to only focus on Hunter Biden - right?
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't - - - 😏
@wildgrass saidI sense that you are full of glee at the lack of humanity that the libs are putting on this man who made some technical entries, subject to the ol' fine tooth comb. Man's inhumanity to man. Making him go through hell. There has to be SOMETHING we can nail his ass with. We hate him for really good reasons, affairs like Bill clinton, such as that.
Imagine if convicted felons started running for political office. The horror...
I would think you would be impressed with his tenacity and stamina. You know, like George Patton. Would you rather a pansy, like Biden or Dukakis? Remember that little creep wanna-be? You faieries are going to need a man in the upcoming global concerns. I recommend Trump, with all his foibles. Would you rather he be like...let me see...Suzianne?
Really what direct crap has Trump ever dished out on anybody? Seems all personal matters to me. But, aha, as I often note, queer people are really into personal stuff, the emotion of it all. Not you, I would never say that about you.
Oh, tell us just how 'convicted' those 12 people have made him, with beautiful appeals and the Constitution on his side.
165d
Oh, another point. You emotional libs look at it as the Judges who took the heat off of Trump. Another constant error of failure to see an issue.
You see, it is not the judges. It was not the judges. It is the Constitution ITSELF.
The Constitution itself has been the controlling factor to arrive at the present state of affairs.
I always love keeping you fellers on track.
165d
@AverageJoe1 saidNope no glee at all from me. I'm an emotionless blob.
I sense that you are full of glee at the lack of humanity that the libs are putting on this man who made some technical entries, subject to the ol' fine tooth comb. Man's inhumanity to man. Making him go through hell. There has to be SOMETHING we can nail his ass with. We hate him for really good reasons, affairs like Bill clinton, such as that.
I would think you wou ...[text shortened]... 'convicted' those 12 people have made him, with beautiful appeals and the Constitution on his side.
165d
@wildgrass saidYou are a rarity. Suefellow and SHouse will not be happy with you.
Nope no glee at all from me. I'm an emotionless blob.
164d
@AverageJoe1 saidCould you show the part of the Constitution which says the President has any immunity from criminal prosecution?
Oh, another point. You emotional libs look at it as the Judges who took the heat off of Trump. Another constant error of failure to see an issue.
You see, it is not the judges. It was not the judges. It is the Constitution ITSELF.
The Constitution itself has been the controlling factor to arrive at the present state of affairs.
I always love keeping you fellers on track.
164d
@no1marauder
Don't worry, he will mewl and holler and move the goalpost. He won't watch this link I posted about Sotomayor either.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/justice-sotomayor-supreme-court-trump-immunity-descision-tapper-digvid
164d
@no1marauder saidHey, just so we stay in the same venue......It does not mention the word abortion, either. It does not mention abortion. And, it does not mention immunity in this scenario. But by god, a lot of pertinent info is there for our judges to draw the proper conclusions. You have GOT to be pretty impressed with the minds of our forebears in 1787 to provide any and all basis for decisions affecting every problem and person in this country. I assume you will agree, or, or, you will have to say that the Constitution does not get the job done. You gonna say that?
Could you show the part of the Constitution which says the President has any immunity from criminal prosecution?
@sonhouse saidOh, there's Sonhouse. ((They told me you went to a swim meet with your grandchild to watch her swim against a very strong man, big hands, thick thighs, muscle city, glut city. I don't know how you can watch that. And she looks uyp to you, and says, grampa, this is not fair. I will NEVER win. I have no future in swimming.))
@no1marauder
Don't worry, he will mewl and holler and move the goalpost. He won't watch this link I posted about Sotomayor either.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/justice-sotomayor-supreme-court-trump-immunity-descision-tapper-digvid
So, here you are after all. What do you think about my answer to Maruader. I am just keeping the playing field level......which the swim coach you are in bed with is not.
@AverageJoe1 saidDo tell us about "emoluments" and the Constitution, and Jared's 2 billion dollar payoff from the Saudis for unknown 'services rendered.' While his dad was in office, those billions are the lawful property of the U.S. treasury and should never have landed in Jared's personal bank account. This is not like a loan to help Hunter buy a car. This is blatant corruption. Keepin' on track here.
Oh, another point. You emotional libs look at it as the Judges who took the heat off of Trump. Another constant error of failure to see an issue.
You see, it is not the judges. It was not the judges. It is the Constitution ITSELF.
The Constitution itself has been the controlling factor to arrive at the present state of affairs.
I always love keeping you fellers on track.
164d
@moonbus saidIs that you, Sonhouse? What a laugh. I only glossed over this foolishness, seen it enough. A man has an investment firm and gets paid a substantial fee for managing the account of people that I guess we are allowed to do business with? And you say this in the shadow of Hunter? I am not going to waste my time, but I would love for you to waste your time and find out what the Biden family was paid close to $30M for? Or, was it $29M, we are not sure because it is hidden in about 30 accounts.
Do tell us about "emoluments" and the Constitution, and Jared's 2 billion dollar payoff from the Saudis for unknown 'services rendered.' While his dad was in office, those billions are the lawful property of the U.S. treasury and should never have landed in Jared's personal bank account. This is not like a loan to help Hunter buy a car. This is blatant corruption. Keepin' on track here.
You are lying if you say it is OK that the Bidens have never volunteered where the money came from (we actually know that) and for what purpose. You would like to know.
Call my response a whtaboutism, but we have done the Jared thread. Look back on some Sonhouse's threads, it is all there. All sides. Knock yourself out.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz