@AverageJoe1
In other words you have no intention of watching that link. Like I asked before, do you even know who Sotomayor is?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/justice-sotomayor-supreme-court-trump-immunity-descision-tapper-digvid
@sonhouse saidOK, I see your video. The news people are seemingly concerned that a president cannot have the powers discussed. How can a presidetn not be able to make certain decisons such as this? Are you so liberal that you cannot stand the sight of blood that Biden or Trump can cause to happen? Protecting a country means kicking ass of people in our way. Maybe you think they should consult YOU abut whether to pull the trigger.
@AverageJoe1
In other words you have no intention of watching that link. Like I asked before, do you even know who Sotomayor is?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/justice-sotomayor-supreme-court-trump-immunity-descision-tapper-digvid
Here is yet another AvJoe question which you will not answer. Should Truman have had the power to destroy a huge city with an atom bomb, killing thousands?
Can you answer this question straight out, Sonhhouse. If you don't , you will earn a new Nickname, I will call you Waffle from here on!! You are challenged!!
@AverageJoe1
The answer to that is YES he has the right to bomb whoever he wants and Trump will have absolute immunity. That what you want in a POTUS? The LITERAL power of a king? The words written were not from commentators, they were from Sotomayor, do you even know who that is?
You haven't got the slightest clue as to the quagmire the US and by implication the entire planet now is with that ruling that BTW came DIRECTLY from the machinations of the heritage foundation, Project 2025, where they want to jail 20 million people, force Christianity to be the state religion, ban ALL abortions NO exception, use the military to quell protests, arrest ANYONE not with the party.
And do it legally since POTUS would presumably be Trump and we can LITERALLY kiss our democracy goodbye and don't EVEN go 'define democracy', this is WAY to deep and sinister a plot to argue semantics.
@sonhouse saidEveryone, SHouse answered a question. Thanks.
@AverageJoe1
The answer to that is YES he has the right to bomb whoever he wants and Trump will have absolute immunity. That what you want in a POTUS?
'He has a right to,,,,'
So, Truman and other presidents have a right to do things, like Hiroshima. I assume that you do NOT think that Truman should face prosecution or impeachment.
Now, can you tell us in plain english without being upset, why Trump cannot be allowed to exercise the same right as did Truman?
Edit: This is a very good issue. All the liberals here, like Sue, say I am stupid and my posts mean nothing. Can you begin by saying, avJoe, you bring up a good point.
@AverageJoe1
Project 2025 is not an attack on a foreign adversary in times of war, this is a DIRECT attack on US, ALL OF US, including you, including your children, you grandchildren, killing even the IDEA voting makes a difference.
https://www.washingtoninformer.com/project-2025-trump-agenda/
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, no, nio....I asked a very simple question, I feel llike there is a cabal joining up against me, ole AvJoe. The simpler my questions, the more diffiicult, you 'all unload on me.
Everyone, SHouse answered a question. Thanks.
'He has a right to,,,,'
So, Truman and other presidents have a right to do things, like Hiroshima. I assume that you do NOT think that Truman should face prosecution or impeachment.
Now, can you tell us in plain english without being upset, why Trump cannot be allowed to exercise the same right as did Truman?
Ed ...[text shortened]... y I am stupid and my posts mean nothing. Can you begin by saying, avJoe, you bring up a good point.
Again.....No one, including you, find any thing wrong with Truman having the right or the power to drop a bomb on 100k people.
Do you find anything wrong with Trump having the right or the power to drop a bomb on 100k people?
Thanks SHouse.