Originally posted by Hand of HecateAn extremely easy question.
What criteria should be used in a decision making process to determine if a country is justified in considering war as an option? Lets define war as a significant engagement of troops in a hostile invasion of another country and not ...[text shortened]... ion used to maintain stability in a world region.
Any thoughts?
The answer:
"Any war is justified that is designed or intended to overcome slavery."
Then all that must be asked is "Can this dictator kill at his pleasure?"
Two simple tests and questions.
Not? Could Saddam send police into the night to arrest, torture and kill with no questions asked? Yes. Those killed are his "property" by definition. Not?