Debates
21 Dec 20
23 Dec 20
@mghrn55 saidI understand that this is a move to get people to start returning to restaurants, but Cuomo and the California sunglasses governor have closed restaurants. What are you trying to say?
@AverageJoe1
You're going to mention the tax write offs for the martini lunches, aren't you ?
Biden and the California governor are all into Top Gun 😎 sunglasses. Do you think they are a bit dramatic? Do you want drama in a President?
23 Dec 20
@averagejoe1 saidYou got something against Ray-Bans?
I understand that this is a move to get people to start returning to restaurants, but Cuomo and the California sunglasses governor have closed restaurants. What are you trying to say?
Biden and the California governor are all into Top Gun 😎 sunglasses. Do you think they are a bit dramatic? Do you want drama in a President?
I have a pair in my car, so what?
23 Dec 20
@averagejoe1 saidWhat you really mean is choices for white people, right?
Right. Choices. But libs, some on this forum, cannot fathom the concept of choices, as it flies in the face of government control, the nanny state, if you will. Your man Obama was a critic of school vouchers (choice), but your president Trump thank-god reversed him. Any lib on the thread who likes govt does not like choices. Brrrrrrrrr
The new State (I guess th ...[text shortened]... tes from now on) will naturally reduce choices, you can bet there won't be many types of cornflakes.
23 Dec 20
@averagejoe1 saidLol hypocrisy before our very eyes.
Whoops That got by me. Thanks, Marauder. I feel better now, because that involves choice. I love this country. Choices!!!
May I elaborate on one thing. Note that this liberal school is into what I have referred to before as Group-think. Do the libs here not see that? They do not think about the individuals... that are in the class. The individual. They see o ...[text shortened]... et this group level, same footing, equal, whatever...'That is not healthy for them, nor for society.
They are thinking about the individual kids that are struggling to grasp what is probably an esoteric subject, I’d be surprised if they were dropping Math or English.
I guess you believe in individual choices like taking the knee or saluting the flag and other choices like that?
24 Dec 20
@kevcvs57 saidI believe in the golden rule. And, that you can take knees or even burn a flag if you want to, ,,,,if others are not harmed by something some person does, he can do it. I don’t know why the black person did the knee and don’t care, I have nothing to do with him, or with a pregnant girl in Idaho. Not my business, is it. No connection, is it. But Kev, this is the crux of liberalism. Your natural mind presumes such social connections exist. I contend that they do not. So I do INDEED stand for their rights to choose,,,,knees, flags, abortion, go for it. Funny, tho, that you tell me to pay for her abortion, and telll ME in that regard that I have no choice,..
Lol hypocrisy before our very eyes.
They are thinking about the individual kids that are struggling to grasp what is probably an esoteric subject, I’d be surprised if they were dropping Math or English.
I guess you believe in individual choices like taking the knee or saluting the flag and other choices like that?
Re-read the above, your comments, please.
BTW I have no idea what your esoteric, math, comment means.
24 Dec 20
@averagejoe1 saidYour telling fibs AJ, if you could throw a switch or cast a vote that got everyone conforming to your favoured choices you’d do it in a heartbeat.
I believe in the golden rule. And, that you can take knees or even burn a flag if you want to, ,,,,if others are not harmed by something some person does, he can do it. I don’t know why the black person did the knee and don’t care, I have nothing to do with him, or with a pregnant girl in Idaho. Not my business, is it. No connection, is it. But Kev, this is the crux ...[text shortened]... ead the above, your comments, please.
BTW I have no idea what your esoteric, math, comment means.
I guess you weren’t raising a glass when scotus got another conservative jurist 😉
24 Dec 20
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidIt is quite logical, in my opinion, that a person who has, shall we say, certain beliefs and principles, would hope that other people would feel the same way as he does. Are you seriously suggesting that that would not be the case? You shouldn't be illogical with AvJoe on Christmas!
Your telling fibs AJ, if you could throw a switch or cast a vote that got everyone conforming to your favoured choices you’d do it in a heartbeat.
I guess you weren’t raising a glass when scotus got another conservative jurist 😉
And would it not follow that if I were, say, a defendant in court, I would want the judge to' conform to my favored (position)' about the trial?? Like, I hope that the SCOTUS judges think like I do, as I want their decisions to fall on the side of Conservatism. Conversely, A liberal defendant would want a judge to rule like they think, to rule that they are allowed to be dependent upon other people.
And, do you notice how I, as a conservative, showed my position clearly here,..... it has a beginning, a middle and an end. It closes, as I like to say sometimes. Liberal debaters on this forum seldom do that. Eg, it is difficult to respond to a one-line post, such as 'The dossier was not fake'. Does the poster want me to respond.."Oh yeah? It most certainly was fake!" Tiresome stuff.
Merry Christmas. Tell all the gun haters, and duck lovers, that I am blasting away at beautiful mallard ducks in Arkansas. And, I am going to EAT them!!!
24 Dec 20
@averagejoe1 saidIt’s not about hope it’s about you wanting legislation passed or rescinded that would force other people to live by your preferred lifestyle and fertility choices. So as a conservative please do not speak about freedom of choice in hallowed terms because nobody in the US despises personal freedom quite as much as you and your kind.
It is quite logical, in my opinion, that a person who has, shall we say, certain beliefs and principles, would hope that other people would feel the same way as he does. Are you seriously suggesting that that would not be the case? You shouldn't be illogical with AvJoe on Christmas!
And would it not follow that if I were, say, a defendant in court, I would want t ...[text shortened]... ers, that I am blasting away at beautiful mallard ducks in Arkansas. And, I am going to EAT them!!!
25 Dec 20
@kevcvs57 saidMan, are we misunderstanding this issue. Kev, first sentence above.....my preferred lifestyle??? How often have I mentioned freedom of choice? A lady can abort a baby if she wants, none of my business. Anyone may have any preferred lifestyle, does not have to be like mine. So you are wrong with both statements.
It’s not about hope it’s about you wanting legislation passed or rescinded that would force other people to live by your preferred lifestyle and fertility choices. So as a conservative please do not speak about freedom of choice in hallowed terms because nobody in the US despises personal freedom quite as much as you and your kind.
But one person simply cannot infringe on the rights of another. Do you not think that 'your rights end where they begin to infringe on the rights of another." You ever heard that one?
So if I and watering my lawn and you walk by, and you tell me what I should do with my life or my money you have infringed on me. Libs do that 24/7. You know that this is a conservative credo. We just want you libs to leave us the hell alone. You know that. So, how can you say we would 'force other people to live by our preferred lifestyle". AOC is about to do that, that is why I despise all that she stands for.
And why would you suggest that I would be involved in the fertility decisions of a woman? Now everyone here thinks that Joe is forcing his idea on fertility choices. Aww, man...
Anyway, Can you answer these 2 questions like a man?