Delay

Originally posted by no1marauder
This is either rank stupidity or trolling.

Why don't you use the App that shows you when and where you can see the ISS with your naked eye as I have done several times? Or you can use this handy dandy site? https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/sightings/

Why would people on the ISS be interested in filming small bits of space debris or even satellites? ...[text shortened]... the existence of something that they could see with their own eyes is worth a lot of their time.

Why don't you use the App that shows you when and where you can see the ISS with your naked eye as I have done several times? Or you can use this handy dandy site? https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/sightings/
Because a thing flying around the earth isn't proof of anything other than... a thing flying around the earth.
You can't see anyone on it, can you?
When they show the people on it, they never do so live with a clear view of the earth showing their position in relation to anything identifiable on the earth in order to compare their stated position with what is occurring in the same areas they claim to be over.

Why would people on the ISS be interested in filming small bits of space debris or even satellites?
Why are they interested in filming clouds?
Land?
The point is, the camera is filming everything they are passing over.
You would think at some point, the camera would pick up the hundreds of thousands of pieces, parts and whole other satellites flying directly in their periphery.

Yes, I'm asking you: Why did they send the [b]International Space Station up if they had no intention of putting astronauts on it? And if they put it up, why wouldn't they?[/b]
They aren't able to do so is the short answer.
The ISS live stream is routinely not transmitting, for some mysterious reason--- as it is right now on the ESS website.

Quite frankly, NASA doesn't seem to feel that trying to convince a small number of nuts in the existence of something that they could see with their own eyes is worth a lot of their time.
Why waste any extra effort when they have a good portion of the population fooled with so little energy?

Originally posted by no1marauder
This about as convincing as your allegations in the other thread that astronauts were throwing around a football with the Super Bowl teams' names on them or that the ISS couldn't possibly be seen with the naked eye.

Funny thing, that.
I conceded I was wrong on the names on the football, but the challenge of how that football got there in the first place remains unresolved.
As does the problem with the 32 jerseys which they just happened to have gotten the colors exactly right.

So there is that.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Funny thing, that.
I conceded I was wrong on the names on the football, but the challenge of how that football got there in the first place remains unresolved.
As does the problem with the 32 jerseys which they just happened to have gotten the colors exactly right.

So there is that.

The two boxes one with away jerseys and the other with home jerseys seems an adequate explanation.

No, the question how footballs got on the ISS was resolved as far as any reasonable person looking at the facts is concerned. They got there just like any other object does.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
[b]Why don't you use the App that shows you when and where you can see the ISS with your naked eye as I have done several times? Or you can use this handy dandy site? https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/sightings/
Because a thing flying around the earth isn't proof of anything other than... a thing flying around the earth.
You can't see anyone on it, can ...[text shortened]... e any extra effort when they have a good portion of the population fooled with so little energy?[/b]

Let's expand on your "short answer": why couldn't they put people on board ISS? It's a pretty simple engineering problem to put objects in space, why not people?

Originally posted by no1marauder
Let's expand on your "short answer": why couldn't they put people on board ISS? It's a pretty simple engineering problem to put objects in space, why not people?

Simple?

Let's just for a second suppose that Freaky's right and that the World is flat, this rules out a satellite. That means to fake it NASA must have pinched Saddam Hussein's supergun at the end of the first Gulf War, the subsequent Iraq War was therefore to make sure he kept quiet. They use the supergun to fire an object, with a red flashing light to keep Suzianne convinced it's real, across the sky every 90 minutes to make us all think they have a Space Station in orbit around a more-or-less spherical Earth. Presumably the purpose of this deceit is to get y'all voting Democrat and prevent the second coming. But don't worry, The Donald of Trump® will bring you Armageddon.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Let's expand on your "short answer": why couldn't they put people on board ISS? It's a pretty simple engineering problem to put objects in space, why not people?

LEO shouldn't be too difficult, but sustaining living conditions on the same is a different ball of wax.

Originally posted by no1marauder
The two boxes one with away jerseys and the other with home jerseys seems an adequate explanation.

No, the question how footballs got on the ISS was resolved as far as any reasonable person looking at the facts is concerned. They got there just like any other object does.

It seems reasonable, just as it has an appearance of proof without actually, you know, providing sufficient proof.
Compounding that issue, they didn't say they sent 64 jerseys, but rather 32 jerseys.

Resolving the football issue, you offered as proof that footballs were already on board footballs which were clearly not the LI football.
No concession on your part for your demonstrably wrong claims, curiously.

And if that wasn't enough compounding of your errors, you ridiculously asserted there was little to no cost involved in getting the jerseys to the station, despite an overwhelming amount of facts stating just the opposite.
And the purpose of their whole charade?
I'm sorry, maybe I didn't say it clear enough:

The purpose of their whole charade?

Since this whole tie-in was ostensibly to inexplicably tie-in with the Super Bowl being played in Houston, then why in God's name did they wait until after the initial presentation to release the video of them going through the 32 jerseys?

Use your head for something other than a doorstop, will you?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
It seems reasonable, just as it has an appearance of proof without actually, you know, providing sufficient proof.
Compounding that issue, they didn't say they sent 64 jerseys, but rather 32 jerseys.

Resolving the football issue, [b]you offered as proof that footballs were already on board footballs which were clearly not[/b ...[text shortened]... em going through the 32 jerseys?

Use your head for something other than a doorstop, will you?

This whole post is a bunch of obvious false statements as shown in the other thread. Not a single thing you say here is true.

It's a waste of time to continue with this idiocy.

Originally posted by no1marauder
This whole post is a bunch of obvious false statements as shown in the other thread. Not a single thing you say here is true.

It's a waste of time to continue with this idiocy.

That's a good boy.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
LEO shouldn't be too difficult, but sustaining living conditions on the same is a different ball of wax.

Tell us, o maven of all knowledge why it is a different ball of wax to have humans in LEO?

Originally posted by sonhouse
Tell us, o maven of all knowledge why it is a different ball of wax to have humans in LEO?

You tell me: they're spending a sh** ton of money, so how come they can't figure out how to get people into space?
Why did we never return to the moon?
Why did we never colonize the moon?
Why would NASA astronots claim the technology that got us there in the first place was destroyed?
Why did they lose all of the telemetry data?
Why do they present lies as truth?
All kinds of good questions on this one, huh.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
You tell me: they're spending a sh** ton of money, so how come they can't figure out how to get people into space?
Why did we never return to the moon?
Why did we never colonize the moon?
Why would NASA astronots claim the technology that got us there in the first place was destroyed?
Why did they lose all of the telemetry data?
Why do they present lies as truth?
All kinds of good questions on this one, huh.

With easy answers, it's called politics. And why do you think we can't get people into space? Are you now denying the Russians can't put people into space?

We beat the Soviets to the moon and then Nixon considered it a publicity stunt now that we proved our point, end of moon landings. Which also explains why we never went back and why you cannot imagine NASA throwing stuff away. It was too bad, they threw away most of the moon landing data and now we are basically building the same Saturn V rocket that took us to the moon in the first place, but updated 5 decades of technological upgrades so it will be faster and able to launch more stuff into lunar and Martian orbits.

You were what, 7 when we went to the moon? Well I was 29 and in the middle of it at Goddard Space Flight Center working Apollo tracking and timing as I have mentioned several times before.

You know nothing from first hand knowledge in this case 100% for sure. I WAS THERE ASSSHOLE, you can't tell me it was faked when I saw it being built.

You only want answers that confirms your antiNASA traitorous stance. That is it in a nutshell.

There CANNOT be whole photo's of Antarctica because that would destroy your entire flass theory.

Therefore NASA LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING. You figure that should cover anything provided by NASA, but all it really does is show how traitorous you really are.

Originally posted by sonhouse
With easy answers, it's called politics. And why do you think we can't get people into space? Are you now denying the Russians can't put people into space?

We beat the Soviets to the moon and then Nixon considered it a publicity stunt now that we proved our point, end of moon landings. Which also explains why we never went back and why you cannot imagine ...[text shortened]... d cover anything provided by NASA, but all it really does is show how traitorous you really are.

I already told you: watched it "LIVE!" on all stations (yeah, we were wild enough to flip it from one channel to the next to see which of the three had the most up-to-date info: they were all the same) sitting in front of the television, cross-legged and full of wonder at five years old.

But then I grew up and found incontrovertible proof that the whole thing was faked, that even though the overwhelming majority of employees in the related fields all thought they were working on history, had no clue otherwise, that they were liars, traitors, anti-science and anti-God, through and through.

I don't condemn the ignorant; I blame the conspirators.
I don't condemn the ignorant; I blame the willful ignorant.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
I already told you: watched it [b]"LIVE!" on all stations (yeah, we were wild enough to flip it from one channel to the next to see which of the three had the most up-to-date info: they were all the same) sitting in front of the television, cross-legged and full of wonder at five years old.

But then I grew up and found incontrovertible proof that th ...[text shortened]... ignorant; I blame the conspirators.
I don't condemn the ignorant; I blame the willful ignorant.[/b]

Ah, just like you. All you do is prove yourself a traitor every time you type.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, just like you. All you do is prove yourself a traitor every time you type.

Stupid me: loyal to the truth.

My bad.