Go back
Democrats and lies...

Democrats and lies...

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
The lie is that the Steele Dossier started the investigation of Trump's campaign's contacts with the Russians. It didn't as you well know. So why keep repeating this lie?
I never claimed the Steele dossier "started" anything and it doesn't matter. HRC used Fusion GPS to create the Steele dossier.

While compiling the dossier, Steele passed information to both British and American intelligence services. How is that any better than what Trump did with Biden?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
You keep deliberately ignoring that Trump is trying to get a foreign government to do an investigation of another candidate for his personal political benefit. That is illegal no matter how many times you act like it isn't or raise some false/irrelevant "whataboutism".
There was no quid pro quo that you can prove so your assertion that it was illegal is BS. Besides, Bush did worse and got away with it. The only way you will get Trump impeached is by getting Bush charged with the crime he committed, unless that is not how precedence works.

https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2003/02/COERCED.pdf

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
06 Oct 19

@metal-brain said
I never claimed the Steele dossier "started" anything and it doesn't matter. HRC used Fusion GPS to create the Steele dossier.

While compiling the dossier, Steele passed information to both British and American intelligence services. How is that any better than what Trump did with Biden?
Actually you claimed twice on the last page, the dossier was "manufactured" to "get Trump investigated". IF the Trump campaign was already being investigated (as it was), then the Steele dossier couldn't "get Trump investigated", could it?

The difference between what GPS Fusion did and what Trump is doing has been explained to you numerous times. The former is legal and the latter is not.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
06 Oct 19
1 edit

@metal-brain said
There was no quid pro quo that you can prove so your assertion that it was illegal is BS. Besides, Bush did worse and got away with it. The only way you will get Trump impeached is by getting Bush charged with the crime he committed, unless that is not how precedence works.

https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2003/02/COERCED.pdf
As explained already, there is no requirement of a "quid pro quo" for an election finance violation.

There is strong circumstantial evidence of a quid pro quo which would support a bribery charge. I expect more to come out as more witnesses are called, more documents revealed and the more whistleblowers come forth.

As stated many times, "whataboutism" is not a valid defense in an impeachment or criminal trial.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
Actually you claimed twice on the last page, the dossier was "manufactured" to "get Trump investigated". IF the Trump campaign was already being investigated (as it was), then the Steele dossier couldn't "get Trump investigated", could it?

The difference between what GPS Fusion did and what Trump is doing has been explained to you numerous times. The former is legal and the latter is not.
LOL! Now you pretend the Steele dossier had no effect on the investigation. Can you prove it was irrelevant?

"The difference between what GPS Fusion did and what Trump is doing has been explained to you numerous times. The former is legal and the latter is not."

That is a lie. You NEVER explained it to me as you well know. You are making up crap again. Stop your bloody lying!

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
As explained already, there is no requirement of a "quid pro quo" for an election finance violation.

There is strong circumstantial evidence of a quid pro quo which would support a bribery charge. I expect more to come out as more witnesses are called, more documents revealed and the more whistleblowers come forth.

As stated many times, "whataboutism" is not a valid defense in an impeachment or criminal trial.
I have absolute proof of a quid pro quo by Bush, not mere circumstantial evidence. Numerous examples.

https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2003/02/COERCED.pdf

Don't pretend you don't know what "precedence" means. It is relevant and that makes your whataboutism claim pathetic BS.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
06 Oct 19

@metal-brain said
I have absolute proof of a quid pro quo by Bush, not mere circumstantial evidence. Numerous examples.

https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2003/02/COERCED.pdf

Don't pretend you don't know what "precedence" means. It is relevant and that makes your whataboutism claim pathetic BS.
Jesus, we went all through your ridiculous assertion that using diplomatic pressure to advance US foreign policy goals is a violation of the Federal Bribery statute.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
06 Oct 19

@metal-brain said
LOL! Now you pretend the Steele dossier had no effect on the investigation. Can you prove it was irrelevant?

"The difference between what GPS Fusion did and what Trump is doing has been explained to you numerous times. The former is legal and the latter is not."

That is a lie. You NEVER explained it to me as you well know. You are making up crap again. Stop your bloody lying!
Stop acting like a child. I explained it on the last page AGAIN:

no1: You keep deliberately ignoring that Trump is trying to get a foreign government to do an investigation of another candidate for his personal political benefit. That is illegal no matter how many times you act like it isn't or raise some false/irrelevant "whataboutism".


GPS Fusion is a US company, not a foreign government. It can be hired to assist a candidate in an election under the law. A foreign government can't be solicited for such aid legally.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
Jesus, we went all through your ridiculous assertion that using diplomatic pressure to advance US foreign policy goals is a violation of the Federal Bribery statute.
No, you never proved that and you know it. You made a baseless BS assertion because you didn't want to admit I was right.
I called you on it and you failed to prove it. You made it up.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
06 Oct 19

@no1marauder said
Stop acting like a child. I explained it on the last page AGAIN:

no1: You keep deliberately ignoring that Trump is trying to get a foreign government to do an investigation of another candidate for his personal political benefit. That is illegal no matter how many times you act like it isn't or raise some false/irrelevant "whataboutism".


GPS Fusion is a US company ...[text shortened]... andidate in an election under the law. A foreign government can't be solicited for such aid legally.
You stop acting like a child. You never proved that. You merely made an assertion without evidence. That is all you do. Knock it off. The reality of the law is much different than that. How many times to I have to call you on it?

Prove it or admit you are wrong. Can you prove a quid pro quo? BTW, Trump had made statements at the time saying there was no quid quo pro and that he would never do that. It was on NBC's Meet the Press today. You are a little behind on the news.

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
06 Oct 19

@metal-brain said
You stop acting like a child. You never proved that. You merely made an assertion without evidence. That is all you do. Knock it off. The reality of the law is much different than that. How many times to I have to call you on it?

Prove it or admit you are wrong. Can you prove a quid pro quo? BTW, Trump had made statements at the time saying there was no quid quo pro a ...[text shortened]... t he would never do that. It was on NBC's Meet the Press today. You are a little behind on the news.
go easy on him, he is about two weeks away from having his little liberal world turned upside down.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37443
Clock
08 Oct 19

@mott-the-hoople said
go easy on him, he is about two weeks away from having his little liberal world turned upside down.
Any day now...


Put up or shut up. Adults are getting tired of your "I'm telling! And then you'll be sorry!" BS.

You pathetic monkeys just don't get that Barr and Trump are stringing you along probably all the way to the election so that you don't wake up and smell the taint of corruption on them.

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
646476
Clock
08 Oct 19
1 edit

You all voted him in, now you know what to do come election time.

Question is who you going to replace him with? I personally thought it was a mistake putting him in the office right from the beginning and I am Canadian by the way!

-VR

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
08 Oct 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Any day now...


Put up or shut up. Adults are getting tired of your "I'm telling! And then you'll be sorry!" BS.

You pathetic monkeys just don't get that Barr and Trump are stringing you along probably all the way to the election so that you don't wake up and smell the taint of corruption on them.
any day now...that is what they were you. you still haven't figured out they were relying on your being dumb enough to believe them. (the gruber effect)

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
08 Oct 19

@very-rusty said
You all voted him in, now you know what to do come election time.

Question is who you going to replace him with? I personally thought it was a mistake putting him in the office right from the beginning and I am Canadian by the way!

-VR
Trump 2020...Trump 2024

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.