16 May 23
@AverageJoe1
The question of illegally acquired property is a good one. If you are not home, and I take your lawn mower and sell it to a guy across town, and pocket the money, who owns the lawn mower? The guy across town thinks he does, and paid for it in good faith.
Part Two: What if the new 'owner' spends $400 to get the rider lawn mower tuned up, and then my neighbor goes to get the lawn mower back from him? What then?
Part three: Say there are 2 vacant lots on Jones street, and I buy the one on the left. I pay a contractor $70k in advance to build a house on the lot, and leave for an Italian holiday for 3 months. I come home and find the house was built on the lot on the RIGHT!
Who owns the house that was built on the wrong lot, a lot that is not my lot? Could I send the contractor over to 'take down' the house and move it over to my lot?**
*. Hint: If contractor steps on the housed lot, he could be arrested for trespassing
16 May 23
@athousandyoung saidWrong. Losers are losers, these guys are not losers.
They're losers, right?
16 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidI know you prefer idle speculation devoid of facts but as a general rule debates don't work that way.
Isn't this more fun than were all the links from you-know-who that we were inundated with? I am the real deal!!
Take it to the General Forum Spanky.
16 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidYou don't agree with President Trump that American soldiers who get hurt or killed in war are losers?
Wrong. Losers are losers, these guys are not losers.
16 May 23
@averagejoe1 said
@AverageJoe1
The question of illegally acquired property is a good one. If you are not home, and I take your lawn mower and sell it to a guy across town, and pocket the money, who owns the lawn mower? The guy across town thinks he does, and paid for it in good faith.
Part Two: What if the new 'owner' spends $400 to get the rider lawn mower tuned up, and then my nei ...[text shortened]... y lot?**
*. Hint: If contractor steps on the housed lot, he could be arrested for trespassing
*. Hint: If contractor steps on the housed lot, he could be arrested for trespassing
Clearly the government controls the housed lot then.
16 May 23
@athousandyoung saidLet us not be silly? The cookies were paid for and are now, later, sitting on a table. AND NOW you say that Hussein picks up the cookies and walks away.......so silly, that is not part of your premise. That would change this whole post, and the court, Which I Have Mentioned Above, will thus become involved. zzzzzzzzzzz
Well clearly you weren't teaching math. 19-3=16
How is the government not part of the picture? If Mr Hussein picks up the cookies and walks away government men with guns will arrest him and return the cookies to the banker Mr Moneypenny.
If the police don't get involved the younger, stronger and tougher guy decides who gets how many cookies. Or the baker just k ...[text shortened]... k to Mr Moneypenny in maintaining his lavish lifestyle in this anarchist society you are describing.
YOu waste the time of our dear readers with your lifestyle, anarchists drivel, it was a nice question till you tore it up. Are you a liberal per chance? They do that every time.
16 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidThe silliness began with you bud.
Let us not be silly? The cookies were paid for and are now, later, sitting on a table. AND NOW you say that Hussein picks up the cookies and walks away.......so silly, that is not part of your premise. That would change this whole post, and the court, Which I Have Mentioned Above, will thus become involved. zzzzzzzzzzz
YOu waste the time of our dear readers with your ...[text shortened]... it was a nice question till you tore it up. Are you a liberal per chance? They do that every time.
"The cookies were paid for"? You mean Moneypenny bought 20 cookies from the baker?!
Well then Moneypenny owns the cookies and the baker makes a profit. Everybody is happy.
That was not the original scenario. The orginal scenario goes like this:
Baker bakes 20 cookies. Government declares that 19 of the cookies belong to Moneypenny because Moneypenny criminally bribed them to say that. He does this because a 3 cookie bribe is less expensive than paying for 19 cookies. Then Moneypenny pays advertisers 2 cookies to shift the blame for the poverty of workers from his own shoulders to that of immigrants. Moneypenny profits 14 cookies and does nothing except exploit the government's monopoly on force.
16 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidPart 1b. The thief dies and his son inherits the mower. The son brags openly about how his alpha male father took the mower from a weakling but the government protects his property rights in the mower anyway.
@AverageJoe1
The question of illegally acquired property is a good one. If you are not home, and I take your lawn mower and sell it to a guy across town, and pocket the money, who owns the lawn mower? The guy across town thinks he does, and paid for it in good faith.
Part Two: What if the new 'owner' spends $400 to get the rider lawn mower tuned up, and then my nei ...[text shortened]... y lot?**
*. Hint: If contractor steps on the housed lot, he could be arrested for trespassing