Go back
Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics

Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

Joe Rogan Guest Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics.

https://rumble.com/vuzwha-joe-rogan-guest-dr.-peter-mccullough-responds-to-critics.html

I am giving people here a chance to show evidence that Dr. Peter McCullough is spreading misinformation. This is your chance. If nobody can do that don't say he is spreading misinformation.

Clock
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain

As always: Try to put the central points in writing not everyone will want to watch random videos. Especially if the length is unkown and a very krass advertisment is put first.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@ponderable said
@Metal-Brain

As always: Try to put the central points in writing not everyone will want to watch random videos. Especially if the length is unkown and a very krass advertisment is put first.
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

@metal-brain said
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
These are not the threads you're looking for.....You do have Jedi training don't you...

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
Jimmy Dore in the first 5 minutes refers to himself as a moron! This rumble clip might just be okay!

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
No. It's a written bloody forum. WRITE or copy and explain.

I'm not going to watch video's of your moronic source of misinformation.

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
A one hour video no less.

Okay First point: Jimmy Dore make s adefinition:

"A conspiracy is one person working with another person. There is no more to it."

This might be his definition. It is of course blatantly different from that source:

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy

An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act

Lets seehow people around here understand the word "conspiracy"
redef
Ponderable

SubscriberPonderable

What is conspiracy

20% any cooperative work
80% unlawful (secret) cooperative work
5 votes • Final results

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

Ok a very small time later he changes definition again...

I watched about 10 minutes and I ask you to put forward any thesis which can be tested. That I should find out the thesis myself and you conclude that nay utterance that I didn't specifically address was accepted is nto standard to "Debate".

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

So in this piece (which is in text): https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/

[McCullogh] claimed the delta variant “really is not responsive at all, or protected at all by the vaccines” and there is “no clinical reason to go get vaccinated.”

And here we do have the results of the studies:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html
All sources are further quoted.

Soo the claim goes not as accepted.

Clock
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
Don’t waste the time of normal reasonable posters, this SITE is not for you, but hey here you are.
Synopsise or shove your click baits where the sun don’t shine.

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@kevcvs57
That would be his ASS.
Did you see he voted in Pond's quiz? Any cooperative work.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Joe Rogan Guest Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics.

https://rumble.com/vuzwha-joe-rogan-guest-dr.-peter-mccullough-responds-to-critics.html

I am giving people here a chance to show evidence that Dr. Peter McCullough is spreading misinformation. This is your chance. If nobody can do that don't say he is spreading misinformation.
RUMBLE is surely in line for
a Pulitzer Prize. There is no denying
that they have news that no one else does. 😆

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@shavixmir said
No. It's a written bloody forum. WRITE or copy and explain.

I'm not going to watch video's of your moronic source of misinformation.
Then don't participate if you are not interested. Move along to another thread.
All you want to do is troll. Nobody cares about you.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@ponderable said
So in this piece (which is in text): https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/

[McCullogh] claimed the delta variant “really is not responsive at all, or protected at all by the vaccines” and there is “no clinical reason to go get vaccinated.”

And here we do have the results of the ...[text shortened]... fully-vaccinated-people.html
All sources are further quoted.

Soo the claim goes not as accepted.
Pfizer made an omicron specific vaccine and is doing trials now. Why would they waste money for something that is not needed?

Their actions prove you wrong. Even Pfizer doesn't believe the CDC. The CDC is just a puppet of big pharma. They are known for rigging data. Your faith in the CDC is laughable.

Clock
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Pfizer made an omicron specific vaccine and is doing trials now. Why would they waste money for something that is not needed?

Their actions prove you wrong. Even Pfizer doesn't believe the CDC. The CDC is just a puppet of big pharma. They are known for rigging data. Your faith in the CDC is laughable.
This is debate as its best: Just saying: "you are wrong".

Put some facts on the table. So what exactly in the quoted papers of CDC is wrong and can be rebutted by other peer-reviewed scientific publications.

And since Dr. McCullogh has (in his own words) 55 peer-reviewed papers on the topic out it should be a piece of cake for you. [Just saying as a scientist: To author more than one paper as lead author per month is near to impossible, so in most papers he will have provided "funding" and "supervision", in other words not done meaningful science)

btw. It seems that Dr. McCullough believes (at least co-authored a publication which states succesful isolation) that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated (10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.062). Something the foremost virology expert in the world (you) says is a lie.
In Metal Brain: Since he lied once all he is saying is probably a lie. So case closed.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.