Joe Rogan Guest Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics.
https://rumble.com/vuzwha-joe-rogan-guest-dr.-peter-mccullough-responds-to-critics.html
I am giving people here a chance to show evidence that Dr. Peter McCullough is spreading misinformation. This is your chance. If nobody can do that don't say he is spreading misinformation.
@Metal-Brain
As always: Try to put the central points in writing not everyone will want to watch random videos. Especially if the length is unkown and a very krass advertisment is put first.
@ponderable saidThen don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
@Metal-Brain
As always: Try to put the central points in writing not everyone will want to watch random videos. Especially if the length is unkown and a very krass advertisment is put first.
@metal-brain saidThese are not the threads you're looking for.....You do have Jedi training don't you...
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
@metal-brain saidJimmy Dore in the first 5 minutes refers to himself as a moron! This rumble clip might just be okay!
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
@metal-brain saidNo. It's a written bloody forum. WRITE or copy and explain.
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
I'm not going to watch video's of your moronic source of misinformation.
@metal-brain saidA one hour video no less.
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
Okay First point: Jimmy Dore make s adefinition:
"A conspiracy is one person working with another person. There is no more to it."
This might be his definition. It is of course blatantly different from that source:
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy
An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act
Lets seehow people around here understand the word "conspiracy"
redef
What is conspiracy
Ok a very small time later he changes definition again...
I watched about 10 minutes and I ask you to put forward any thesis which can be tested. That I should find out the thesis myself and you conclude that nay utterance that I didn't specifically address was accepted is nto standard to "Debate".
So in this piece (which is in text): https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/
[McCullogh] claimed the delta variant “really is not responsive at all, or protected at all by the vaccines” and there is “no clinical reason to go get vaccinated.”
And here we do have the results of the studies:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html
All sources are further quoted.
Soo the claim goes not as accepted.
@metal-brain saidDon’t waste the time of normal reasonable posters, this SITE is not for you, but hey here you are.
Then don't waste space on this thread by trolling. This thread is not for you.
Synopsise or shove your click baits where the sun don’t shine.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidRUMBLE is surely in line for
Joe Rogan Guest Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics.
https://rumble.com/vuzwha-joe-rogan-guest-dr.-peter-mccullough-responds-to-critics.html
I am giving people here a chance to show evidence that Dr. Peter McCullough is spreading misinformation. This is your chance. If nobody can do that don't say he is spreading misinformation.
a Pulitzer Prize. There is no denying
that they have news that no one else does. 😆
@shavixmir saidThen don't participate if you are not interested. Move along to another thread.
No. It's a written bloody forum. WRITE or copy and explain.
I'm not going to watch video's of your moronic source of misinformation.
All you want to do is troll. Nobody cares about you.
@ponderable saidPfizer made an omicron specific vaccine and is doing trials now. Why would they waste money for something that is not needed?
So in this piece (which is in text): https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/
[McCullogh] claimed the delta variant “really is not responsive at all, or protected at all by the vaccines” and there is “no clinical reason to go get vaccinated.”
And here we do have the results of the ...[text shortened]... fully-vaccinated-people.html
All sources are further quoted.
Soo the claim goes not as accepted.
Their actions prove you wrong. Even Pfizer doesn't believe the CDC. The CDC is just a puppet of big pharma. They are known for rigging data. Your faith in the CDC is laughable.
@metal-brain saidThis is debate as its best: Just saying: "you are wrong".
Pfizer made an omicron specific vaccine and is doing trials now. Why would they waste money for something that is not needed?
Their actions prove you wrong. Even Pfizer doesn't believe the CDC. The CDC is just a puppet of big pharma. They are known for rigging data. Your faith in the CDC is laughable.
Put some facts on the table. So what exactly in the quoted papers of CDC is wrong and can be rebutted by other peer-reviewed scientific publications.
And since Dr. McCullogh has (in his own words) 55 peer-reviewed papers on the topic out it should be a piece of cake for you. [Just saying as a scientist: To author more than one paper as lead author per month is near to impossible, so in most papers he will have provided "funding" and "supervision", in other words not done meaningful science)
btw. It seems that Dr. McCullough believes (at least co-authored a publication which states succesful isolation) that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated (10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.062). Something the foremost virology expert in the world (you) says is a lie.
In Metal Brain: Since he lied once all he is saying is probably a lie. So case closed.