Dr. Peter McCullough RESPONDS To Critics

@ponderable said
This is debate as its best: Just saying: "you are wrong".

Put some facts on the table. So what exactly in the quoted papers of CDC is wrong and can be rebutted by other peer-reviewed scientific publications.

And since Dr. McCullogh has (in his own words) 55 peer-reviewed papers on the topic out it should be a piece of cake for you. [Just saying as a scientist: To aut ...[text shortened]... ys is a lie.
In Metal Brain: Since he lied once all he is saying is probably a lie. So case closed.

@Metal-Brain

You did not in a single word come to the OP or my thesis: so the question is bluntly:

Has SARS-CoV-2 been isolated?

@ponderable said
@Metal-Brain

You did not in a single word come to the OP or my thesis: so the question is bluntly:

Has SARS-CoV-2 been isolated?

@metal-brain said
It depends on your criteria.

Was it isolated according to River's postulate? No.
If you do not care about River's postulate, yes.

@ponderable said
So is River's postulate state of the art in virology?

@metal-brain said
I don't know. Do you?

Now to the OP:

* I agree with McCullough that is is questionable to vaccine targeting a spike protein that is (as far as we know now) extinct.

* I however agree also with people claiming that there is still some protection of the original vaccines against omikron.

* I also agree with the position that we can't keep lockstep with each and every variant. This is evidenced by the vaccination against influenza.

* I agree that each and every introduction of any matter into a human body can cause unforseen and sometimes fatal effects.

* I doubt that all medication prescribed by McCullough have statistically less side effects. A lot of the cardiac medication is quite potent in side effects.

@ponderable said
The postulate as such is still recognized, the criterion "isolation" has long shifted away from what you and your Canadian Journalist claimed.

@ponderable said
Now to the OP:

* I agree with McCullough that is is questionable to vaccine targeting a spike protein that is (as far as we know now) extinct.

* I however agree also with people claiming that there is still some protection of the original vaccines against omikron.

* I also agree with the position that we can't keep lockstep with each and every variant. This is evi ...[text shortened]... ve statistically less side effects. A lot of the cardiac medication is quite potent in side effects.

@metal-brain said
"I however agree also with people claiming that there is still some protection of the original vaccines against omikron. "

Some? How much is some?
A negligible amount?

You don't know. Admit it.

@ponderable said
In fact I think we are at about 25% reduction in infections according to

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.07.21267432

I believe this is true.

And I don't need to admit anything. That is what keeps people from taking you earnest: hat you go to extreme wording very fast People believe that you are not interested in facts but in showing your conceived superiority. Something that brings people to cut you down....

@metal-brain said
Who do you think you are fooling. That article is called "Reduced Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant by Vaccine Sera and Monoclonal Antibodies".

That article has absolutely nothing to do with ivermectin. You are such a liar!

@ponderable said
You did it again! You are a shamelöess and baseless lair ccoring to your own criteria. I was quoteing the post in which you asked about the level of immunity from omikron by vaccines.

Time for an apology.

@metal-brain said
"I however agree also with people claiming that there is still some protection of the original vaccines against omikron. "

Some? How much is some?
A negligible amount?

You don't know. Admit it.

@shavixmir said
The Durch gave out statistics about hospitalisations. I don’t have time to find them for you.
But, roughly 0% of hospitalisations in the group who have been vaccinated and boostered.

So, increasing the antibodies works.