Go back
Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski

Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski

Debates

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37328
Clock
20 Sep 23

@metal-brain said
" there is years of reliable independent research testifying that surgery, radiography, chemotherapy and hormone therapy do work"

Surgery for sure can be a life saver, but I was not talking about that.
How well does chemotherapy and radiation work? Better than Burzynski's treatment? How do you know?

Some people who got treatment from Burzynski are fierce supporter ...[text shortened]... treatment I will consider that possibility he is a charlatan like Anthony Fauci is. Can you do that?
Effing Google the efficacy of each treatment yourself, we do not have go looking for evidence that these post surgery techniques work it’s self evident.
You need to find an independent large scale trial which shows some efficacy for the Burzynski technique of imbibing urine and blood extracts

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22663
Clock
20 Sep 23
1 edit

@kevcvs57 said
Effing Google the efficacy of each treatment yourself, we do not have go looking for evidence that these post surgery techniques work it’s self evident.
You need to find an independent large scale trial which shows some efficacy for the Burzynski technique of imbibing urine and blood extracts
I have a neighbor that had chemotherapy recently. After he got home he was nearly crippled by it. I had to help him get out of his bed on his feet he was so weak. It was very painful for him. He told me he is not going to get chemotherapy again. It was very painful for him. He is walking on his own again, but he is still weak from it.
Personally, I don't think chemotherapy helps much at all. I am even convinced it might do more harm than good.

I take it you found out that small scale trials exist that support Burzynski's treatments. Does that mean you reject all small scale trials and only consider large scale trials to be credible?

Brave it.
https://search.brave.com/

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37328
Clock
20 Sep 23

@metal-brain said
I have a neighbor that had chemotherapy recently. After he got home he was nearly crippled by it. I had to help him get out of his bed on his feet he was so weak. It was very painful for him. He told me he is not going to get chemotherapy again. It was very painful for him. He is walking on his own again, but he is still weak from it.
Personally, I don't think chemothera ...[text shortened]... trials and only consider large scale trials to be credible?

Brave it.
https://search.brave.com/
Sorry but independent peer reviewed clinical trials and result tabulation outweigh the experience of a Facebookesque sock puppet
Chemo is never nice and can have serious side effects but your survival stats are greatly improved by having it as a follow up to surgery
Burzynski’s method also has side effects but for no measurable benefit

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22663
Clock
20 Sep 23
2 edits

@kevcvs57 said
Sorry but independent peer reviewed clinical trials and result tabulation outweigh the experience of a Facebookesque sock puppet
Chemo is never nice and can have serious side effects but your survival stats are greatly improved by having it as a follow up to surgery
Burzynski’s method also has side effects but for no measurable benefit
You are just assuming that because you have not offered any proof. You have blind faith in the medical system. I am willing to bet chemotherapy is not very effective at all. I was like you, just assumed it must be effective if doctors recommended it. After seeing how it nearly crippled my neighbor and made him very weak I no longer assume anymore.

"Burzynski’s method also has side effects but for no measurable benefit"

Same thing for chemo. Horrible side effects and no measurable benefit. How do you explain his supporters that beat cancer and attribute it to his treatment? Do a small fraction of people beat cancer without treatment and they were not helped by treatment at all? If so, the same must happen to a small fraction of chemo patients, right?

I braved "chemotherapy effectiveness" and all they say is effectiveness depends on this and that. They don't offer any independent peer reviewed sources or any numbers to support that chemo is effective at all, but chemo is a drug. Big pharma profits from those drugs and we all know big pharma cares more about profits than people.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22663
Clock
20 Sep 23
1 edit

@kevcvs57
The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15630849/

Some cancers suddenly disappear without treatment.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-cancers-suddenly-treatment.html

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.