* U.N. watchdog head says Iran wants nuclear bomb capability
* ElBaradei: Iran seeks major power status in Middle East
LONDON, June 17 (Reuters) - Iran wants the ability to build nuclear weapons to gain the reputation of a major power in the Middle East, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said in a BBC interview broadcast on Wednesday.
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said Iran sees nuclear weapons as an "insurance policy" against perceived threats from neighbouring countries or the United States.
Read more at: http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSLH646060
*******************************************************
Obama will have a hard nut to crack. What do you think should the US approach be towards the Iranian regime concerning this major issue ?
Originally posted by ivanhoeAll middle east should be a nuclear free zone! Including Israel.
* U.N. watchdog head says Iran wants nuclear bomb capability
* ElBaradei: Iran seeks major power status in Middle East
Why stop there?
All the world should be a nuclear free zone! Including USA, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.
Originally posted by FabianFnasExcellent idea.
All middle east should be a nuclear free zone! Including Israel.
Why stop there?
All the world should be a nuclear free zone! Including USA, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.
And you propose to make this charming vision a reality how, exactly?
Originally posted by sh76Well, first of all Israel must get rid of their nukes. Because if they don't, Iran want to have theirs.
Excellent idea.
And you propose to make this charming vision a reality how, exactly?
Without the Israeli nukes, Iran is more easily persuaded to stop their nuke program.
I'm glad you think this is a charming idea though. And I agree. A world without nuclear weapons is a better world.
Originally posted by FabianFnas"The NPT is a landmark international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."
All middle east should be a nuclear free zone! Including Israel.
Why stop there?
All the world should be a nuclear free zone! Including USA, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Treaties/npt.html
Originally posted by FabianFnasWell, first of all, you said that no one should have nukes, including the USA, France, Russia etc. So, why start with Israel?
Well, first of all Israel must get rid of their nukes. Because if they don't, Iran want to have theirs.
Without the Israeli nukes, Iran is more easily persuaded to stop their nuke program.
If you think that Israel getting rid of its nukes would cause Iran to stop its pursuit, I believe you are being quite gullible. First of all, Iran has never even been in a direct war with Israel ("direct" as opposed to through its proxies). Israel is not going to invade Iran and has no interest in attacking it (other than, perhaps, to stop it from developing nukes, making it a catch-22). Second, Iran wants to be able to neutralize the USA and, yes, the EU as well.
Iran will not drop their nuclear program unless forced to (or somehow convinced to through a combination of threats and bribes).
Originally posted by ivanhoeNon-proliferation is not the same as elimination of the weapons.
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Treaties/npt.html
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/infcirc140.pdf
If getting rid of all nukes forever were possible, it would be a great idea. But, when everyone has the incentive to keep the last ones for themselves, I don't see how you're going to get rid of them all together.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThis is the logic the Iranian regime is using to justify their activities on the nuclear weapons front.
It would probably be good for Middle East stability if Iran had nuclear weapons, then the US cannot invade so easily.
How do you think Israel feels about an Iran armed with nuclear weapons and long distance missiles that can easily reach the country?
How do you think Egypt, Jordan, Irak, Saudi-Arabia, the Gulf states and even Turkey feel about a nuclear armed Iran ?
Originally posted by ivanhoeHe should be conservative and calm. Aggression is not indicated. Work through allies, get them to publicly pull us into the matter if needed (and I don't mean Israel).
* U.N. watchdog head says Iran wants nuclear bomb capability
* ElBaradei: Iran seeks major power status in Middle East
LONDON, June 17 (Reuters) - Iran wants the ability to build nuclear weapons to gain the reputation of a major power in the Middle East, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said in a BBC interview broadcast on Wednesday.
Mohamed ...[text shortened]... o you think should the US approach be towards the Iranian regime concerning this major issue ?
Originally posted by sh76Because Israel is the only nuclear country in the region. If they have nukes, then Iran should have to, according to Iran, for the sake of terror balance. So Israel is a good start.
Well, first of all, you said that no one should have nukes, including the USA, France, Russia etc. So, why start with Israel?
If you think that Israel getting rid of its nukes would cause Iran to stop its pursuit, I believe you are being quite gullible. First of all, Iran has never even been in a direct war with Israel ("direct" as opposed to through its pro ...[text shortened]... rogram unless forced to (or somehow convinced to through a combination of threats and bribes).
Furthermore - Israel is a country without supervision from IAEA, they have not signed the NPT treaty. Therefore they are in the same league as North Korea. Do we trust Israel, in the light what they're doing to the Palestinians? I say no.
It would be a good start if Israel got rid of their nukes first, and let IAEA in, and then sign the NPT treaty. Then we can force Iran to do the same. Not before.