@kazetnagorra saidI believe it says 4 out of 10,000? Are you making a retraction?
You link to an article that mentions that two out of every 10,000 papers are retracted, and this is "often" in your view?
@divegeester saidSomeone Eladar Trusts is a crook. Surprise.
She was arrested and convicted for theft.
Try reading the entire page.
https://www.the-scientist.com/research-round-up/top-10-retractions-of-2017-29834
"“Definitely embarrassing.” That’s how Nobel winner Jack Szostak of Harvard University described the retraction in December of his 2016 article in Nature Chemistry. The authors asked for the retraction after a researcher in Szostak’s lab could not reproduce the findings, which the group attributes to honest error. Szostak wasn’t the only Nobelist to lose a paper this year. In October, Science retracted a 2014 paper by Bruce Beutler, winner of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, also for failure to reproduce the results."
It even happens to Nobel Laureates...
The post that was quoted here has been removedAccording to KazetTheGreat, us simpletons without PhD's should just blindly trust in authority. Is Judy not an authority on virology in comparison to us? Is Judy not an authority on virology in comparison to him?
There is no sense to be "thinking for yourself" as KazetTheGreat would say. Let the "smart" people with PhD's do that for you.
@divegeester saidhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Mikovits#Education
She was arrested and convicted for theft.
Try reading the entire page.
"On November 18, 2011, she was arrested in her Ventura County, California, home and jailed for 5 days based on WPI's allegations that she stole materials from the organization.[9] Her lawyer said the charges had no merit.[10] By November 28, after negotiations with the WPI, some lab notes were returned.[11] Later, the criminal charges against her were dismissed by the Reno, Nevada, District Attorney's office. "
Where does it say she was convicted of theft? Will you be making a retraction also?
The post that was quoted here has been removed"she subsequently came under investigation for alleged manipulation of data in her publications related to XMRV"
Was she found to be grossly negligent in the private investigation? What were the conclusions?
Anyhow, you are missing the point I have made. I don't care that much about Judy. Other than the fact that she is probably right about Fauci having some disturbing conflicts of interest with respect to COVID, the Wuhan Lab, and Vaccinations.
“Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
― Albert Einstein
@great-king-rat saidI suppose to a person raised in your society freedom of thought would appear strange.
Why are you Americans so.... weird...
So amazingly *weird*.
Is it something in the water??
@eladar saidI’ve asked you four times now, what would you describe as being an authoritative source?
I suppose to a person raised in your society freedom of thought would appear strange.
@eladar saidI’ve asked you five times now, what would you describe as being an authoritative source?
It also does not make wiki an authoritative source.
@joe-shmo saidThe problem is you aren't thinking for yourself, but eagerly swallowing whatever crosses your path and sounds nice to you.
According to KazetTheGreat, us simpletons without PhD's should just blindly trust in authority. Is Judy not an authority on virology in comparison to us? Is Judy not an authority on virology in comparison to him?
There is no sense to be "thinking for yourself" as KazetTheGreat would say. Let the "smart" people with PhD's do that for you.