Originally posted by SuzianneAnd Suzianne believes everything she was told in school, all of what her government tells her and everything the mainstream media says--- well, certain channels, at least.
"But according to a report from the New York Post, FBI agents believe an inside deal was struck on that plane to keep Hillary Clinton free of indictment."
Freaky believes the earth is flat and that the government was complicit in the 9/11 attack, too.
So much for what people "believe".
The political right have had plenty of wood for a Hillary convi ...[text shortened]... ong now that we've heard it all, and we're just not convinced. The boy has cried "wolf" enough.
Ooøœ.
Nearly forgot!
Suzianne also believes that the hottest, most attractive woman on this site, trisha80, actually has a penis and is really a man, man.
A freaky-deaky dude, man.
So much for what people believe, right?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSince it is honesty that was in question, it is interesting that you don't list his lies as part of his style.
I'll grant that Trump has been a lightning rod of controversy through the years on account of his style.
Bombastic, outlandish, braggadocios and generally pompous.
Do you see Trumps dishonesty as part of his style and thus excusable?
Trump has had a handful of businesses fail out of literally hundreds and hundreds which he created
Or so he claims. But given that his 'style' is all about self promotion, I find that hard to believe.
Otherwise, he's pretty tame except as noted.
Except for his lies and his 'style' typically involving deliberately stirring up conflict for his own benefit.
Clinton, on the other hand, has been at or near the center on nearly countless scandals,
Your inability to count is noted along with your flat earth beliefs.
If you were writing a soap opera using half of the particulars of facts in and around her, your script would be rejected on account of being too fantastic to be believed.
Yes, most of what you say is 'too fantastic to be believed' as well as being a little short on facts.
16 Jul 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadDo you see Trumps dishonesty as part of his style and thus excusable?
Since it is honesty that was in question, it is interesting that you don't list his lies as part of his style.
Do you see Trumps dishonesty as part of his style and thus excusable?
[b]Trump has had a handful of businesses fail out of literally hundreds and hundreds which he created
Or so he claims. But given that his 'style' is all about self pro ...[text shortened]... most of what you say is 'too fantastic to be believed' as well as being a little short on facts.[/b]
And these lies (listed) are...
Or so he claims. But given that his 'style' is all about self promotion, I find that hard to believe.
That's why you should research for yourself to determine what is chicken salad and what is chicken, well, you know.
Your inability to count is noted along with your flat earth beliefs.
A tad hyperbolic on my part.
Does 90 seem a bit unusual?
No fewer than 90 deaths--- many of them highly suspicious--- have occurred in and around the Clinton's political endeavors.
Yes, most of what you say is 'too fantastic to be believed' as well as being a little short on facts.
Unlike some, I do not accept Snopes as an authoritative source when it comes to reality.
It takes an enormous ability to suspend one's belief to not see the correlation between the Clinton's and the many, many deaths of those around them as they clawed their way to the top.
No one else in the political arena can be compared.
In fact ALL others in the political arena, with the entirety of their 'suspicious deaths' all added together wouldn't be a tenth of the ones which occurred involving the Clinton's.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHMore Republican wet dreams.
I'll grant that Trump has been a lightning rod of controversy through the years on account of his style.
Bombastic, outlandish, braggadocios and generally pompous.
In contrast, besides coming across publicly as a bit of a ice-queen shrill, Clinton cannot be accused of any stylistic missteps (her private conduct isn't in consideration, of course, ...[text shortened]... not.
But there certainly is an element of being damned by having anything to do with Clinton.
19 Jul 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBH"hottest, most attractive woman on this site"
And Suzianne believes everything she was told in school, all of what her government tells her and everything the mainstream media says--- well, certain channels, at least.
Ooøœ.
Nearly forgot!
Suzianne also believes that the hottest, most attractive woman on this site, trisha80, actually has a penis and is really a man, man.
A freaky-deaky dude, man.
So much for what people believe, right?
You flatter yourself.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHOn the other hand, his choice of Pence as VP might be a stroke of genius.
[b]Do you see Trumps dishonesty as part of his style and thus excusable?
And these lies (listed) are...
Or so he claims. But given that his 'style' is all about self promotion, I find that hard to believe.
That's why you should research for yourself to determine what is chicken salad and what is chicken, well, you know.
Your inability ...[text shortened]... aths' all added together wouldn't be a tenth of the ones which occurred involving the Clinton's.
He's possibly the only other politician, besides Trump, that nobody can even imagine sitting in the White House, and so Dems might think twice about sending Trump to prison on multiple fraud counts. Perhaps if we got rid of Pence first, but even then, Ryan in the White House? This is madness.
19 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneStill stuck on that absurd accusation, eh?
[b]"hottest, most attractive woman on this site"
You flatter yourself.[/b]
Must be so lonely for you that you feel forced to manufacture these fantasies just to assuage your butthurt over the new gal hogging all the attention.
It's true, though: no one knows what she looks like.
It could be her reflection in a mirror is as much of a disappointment for her as it is when you look thusly.
Although it might come as a complete shock to you, it appears as though the attention she has garnered up to this point (your negative campaigning notwithstanding) is a result of her personality made evident in her postings.
Of course, if it turns out she is just as hot physically as she is attractive in personality, well, that's just a freaking cherry on top, right?