25 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidThere isn't the chance of a snowball in hades he'll do time.
This link is a good up-to-date synopsis for the uninformed on the Forum. It even explains a policy providing that actions like this vs Hunter may be delayed, when close to elections. Do y'all think he will skate? Would I, if I did all that?
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3571578-is-the-clock-finally-running-out-on-hunter-biden/
@mchill saidNo, no, no.....it would be no different than the libs here who think Trump is a criminal and have been trying him on RHP for about 5 years now, having already passed judgment. Please be fair?
Do y'all think he will skate?
I think y'all might want to let the judicial system deal with this instead of trying to hold the trial on Red Hot Pawn. What do y"all think of that?
So, given that you do that, then I again ask, do you think Hunter is a criminal, like you think Trump, is a criminal?
Do you see the difficulty with a con discussing matters with a lib? You are saying not to pre-judge Hunter, but it is OK to prejudge Trump. Jesus H.
25 Jul 22
@no1marauder saidWell, yes, it is unclear . Because, It is still getting threshed out. Why say that? Only last week some very new damning material was discovered on the lap top.
Last sentence:
"It is unclear what, if anything, Weiss has uncovered about the Bidens — but, perhaps for the first time, time will tell."
Powerful stuff.
So, yes, time will tell. Whew.
@no1marauder saidOh, man, are you reaching....is that all you got?
The one that proved the Russian government was intent on helping Trump win the 2016 election and his campaign was quite willing to accept such help?
That "witch hunt"?
Hillary's fake dossier was bought and paid for by Hillary. Note the disingenuous nature of this Marauder post, acting like nothing happened other than his one sentence above!!. Libs leave a LOT of stuff hanging, or unsaid. They do not close their posts.
25 Jul 22
@vivify saidRight. I don't read the opinions of the jester, either. What is your point? I am to take up my beautiful days living in a bubble , reading what other people THINK about things?? hahaha
Jesus Christ. From your own link:
"it is unclear if there were any indictments"
So Biden STILL hasn't been charged with anything? Yawn.
Keep in mind this article is in the *opinion* section, written by a right-winger who also contributes to Fox News defending Trump.
25 Jul 22
@mott-the-hoople saidThat's not "exoneration".
“In a report released last year, Mueller found no conclusive evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign.”
Read that till you understand it
Go back to English class.
25 Jul 22
@mghrn55 saidCheck out MGHM. No mention of Hillary. I don't blame him
Note the use of the word conclusive.
There were enough red flags to warrant an investigation.
btw, the intent of the investigation was to determine if the Russians interfered with the the election.
The answer to that was a solid YES.
Seeing if Trump was involved was a side investigation, where Mueller "decided" to not pursue any further.
Perhaps to prevent a constitution ...[text shortened]... d with the Brexit vote as well.
The UK just didn't have a big crybaby yapping about it endlessly.
Hey MGM, Suzianne is itching to talk about the Witch Hunt, y'all start another thread....PLEASE..
25 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidWhy don't I just google the RNC? Many MORE lies there.
You are in luck, just google Trump Witch Hunt. Glad to help. Or wait, some one may LINK one to you!!
25 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidThe 'witch hunt' concept is a fallacy made up purely in the diseased mind of Trump himself, mainly to get his inane followers to double-down on their cult-like support of him.
Check out MGHM. No mention of Hillary. I don't blame him
Hey MGM, Suzianne is itching to talk about the Witch Hunt, y'all start another thread....PLEASE..