Fresh thread, R’House soon to be RICH!

@jimm619 said
...Think so? I think that rather than being
viewed as an innocent man acting in self-defense,
he will be treated as a pariah, like George
Zimmerman, O.J. Simpson and Dan White before them/
Recall what became of O.J.'s book?\
He cannot sue the state for wrongful prosecution as
The State of Wisconsin acted in good faith.
...Young Rittenhouse, unless he is a sociopath, w ...[text shortened]... and will probably die by his own hand.
....I do, however, believe that The Feds will re-charge him.

@mchill said
Here you make light of the crime of defamation? Then, Why does it exist? Please elaborate, that he should not be compensated, right up to “He is a White Supremacist”

Please Joe - Restrain your leaps of illogic. I haven't followed this trial much, and frankly don't give a hoot about it. In addition, I never said he shouldn't be compensated, I was only speculating on if seeki ...[text shortened]... ld his efforts be better spent elsewhere.

It doesn't take much to light your fuse - does it? 🙄

@contenchess said
@jimm619

He's going to sue the media.
Not the Wisconsin Court.
Nick Sandman got 250 million from the media for a lot less than what Rittenhouse went through.

(It is unknown how much he actually got but he still won the lawsuit)

The feds only take cases they know they can win. This case has too much doubt and a fed jury is still regular people.

@averagejoe1 said
Consummate clueless liberal. Look at it the proper way. Saying he is “ seeking to profit off of the verdict “ is akin to Suzianne as she said ad nauseum for years...”profiting off the backs of others.”
Lib, he is trying to get a person/entity who slandered, defamed him, to pay him a lot of money. Tell us how your profit off the verdict makes any sense, I don’t even understand what it means.

@jimm619

The feds don't play and they take winning cases.

I know...I was in the feds for 7 years.
On the wrong side obviously.
I saw 7 years of other inmate cases and it's clear the feds only go after a prosecution win.

I think they have a 93 percent conviction rate or something.
The Rittenhouse case has too much doubt for the feds to try a case against him.

Hey Libs.....if Rittenhouse wins, say, $1M, do you tnink that anyone in the universe has any right to the money, or a part of the money., which is his money?
Other than paying his FAIR SHARE of taxes, that is. But what would be a fair share? What is Fair Share?

@contenchess said
@mchill

It's not the verdict but the libel lawsuits because leftist news was saying a lot of made up crap.

@dood111 said
A congressman has offered Rittenhouse a job as an intern!

@averagejoe1 said
Hey Libs.....if Rittenhouse wins, say, $1M, do you tnink that anyone in the universe has any right to the money, or a part of the money., which is his money?
Other than paying his FAIR SHARE of taxes, that is. But what would be a fair share? What is Fair Share?

BLM 40 - Rittenhouse 3. Sounds like Rittenhouse has to reload.

@suzianne said
Just because he gets off, doesn't mean he's innocent.

Remember OJ?

KR is the white OJ.

@suzianne said
He should donate it to the Kenosha branch of BLM.

@dood111 said
BLM has raked in billions since it's inception, not one penny of it has been spent helping anyone, last thing they need is more money to piss away on mansions and luxury items for the top leaders.

@mchill said
I haven't followed this trial, so don't have an opinion on it, but making money off the results of a legal verdict might not be (in a manner of speaking) the American way. 😕