Originally posted by SquelchbelchWell if the presidency were a trade, wouldn't you want some one who has spent a lot of time there as an apprentice?
I think she has the qualities needed for the job.
I'm sure Hilary's attributes have been well described and I suppose much can be made of appearances, though it would seem that Hilary was the driving force, the single minded ideologue, that kept Bill on track.
This way around we get the real deal in the chair, and the court jester doing sideshow.π
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterIs that how your political choices work? "Well, he desires power over all else...will say anything if he thinks it's what we want to hear and it will make him more powerful...but at least he's a Republican! Let's vote him in."
She desires power above all else and will say anything to anyone at any time if she thinks that's what they want to hear and that it will advance her quest to accumulate more personal power. Even worse, she's a Democrat.
Originally posted by KellyJayI think you have a good point.
What do you mean same hang ups, does it matter if it is a Republican
or a Democrat what does it mean she has experience? What did she
do while she was in the White house that makes those years for her
something I can put next to Joe Biden and say she has experience
like he does? If all she has is she married well (or just married Bill)
that says nothin ...[text shortened]... etting Bill be president again except this time she has the
title and he has the power.
Kelly
Originally posted by AThousandYoungBeing so far removed from all of those people, I wouldn't know what
Except non-Christians.
they are any way. I have to rely on the News to tell me and I don't
trust that as far as I can throw it. π Anyone can claim to be anything
many of them know the right words to say, but do they really mean
them?
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayohhhh GAWD it's starting all over again aaaaaggghhhhh.
As I recall they were one involved one of the two elections he was in.
Kelly
No. The supreme court did not elect the president. However the idea is so appealing that that's how it's done now. We don't even vote anymore. Are ya happy now?
Originally posted by Sam The ShamWhy sure I'm happy, I'm having a very happy New Years. It has
ohhhh GAWD it's starting all over again aaaaaggghhhhh.
No. The supreme court did not elect the president. However the idea is so appealing that that's how it's done now. We don't even vote anymore. Are ya happy now?
nothing to do with how GWB got elected either time either. I felt
he was elected both times, but that is just me, well me a few million
others. π
Kelly
Originally posted by SMSBear716That's why I will be changing my registration from independent to republican on the 3rd, so I can caucus for Ron Paul!
You mean Ron Paul, the libertarian from Texas who disguises (or tries to) as a Republican. He is as much a Republican as Hillary
John Paul was a Catholic Pope (smiles)
Originally posted by zebanoI don't think we have caucuses in Texas... we have primaries and general elections. Haven't been in Texas long enough for a Presidential election yet so I'm just going on my 'gut' feeling.
That's why I will be changing my registration from independent to republican on the 3rd, so I can caucus for Ron Paul!